On 1/13/2020 10:03 AM, David Wright wrote:
Once again, I can tell you nothing about Pluma.
Pluma is a direct descendant of the Gnome 2 text editor, whose name
currently escapes me.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, at 16:01, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/13/2020 07:57 AM, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> > [ *MASSIVE* snip ]
Fuck off.
--
Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.
On Mon 13 Jan 2020 at 07:03:05 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/13/2020 06:13 AM, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, at 11:52, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> > > I was looking for a description of what Pluma was trying to accomplish
> > > by their highlighting rules.
> >
> > Do you
On 01/13/2020 07:57 AM, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
[ *MASSIVE* snip ]
Put it another way, if you put just a handful of lines in a separate
file, does that file get coloured the same way?
I took that some steps further.
The *observability* of the problem is dependent on at least font size,
font fac
On Mon 13 Jan 2020 at 05:46:36 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/12/2020 01:20 PM, David Wright wrote:
> > " "
>
> Please read post before replying.
> That *INCLUDES* Subject.
The only word in your subject line that I didn't specifically refer to
was "Pluma". I haven't come across Pluma in
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, at 13:03, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/13/2020 06:13 AM, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, at 11:52, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> >> I was looking for a description of what Pluma was trying to accomplish
> >> by their highlighting rules.
> >
> > Do you understand
On 2020-01-13, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> That is too detailed(ww?). It is similar to "not being able to see
> forest for the trees".
I'm afraid I took you at your word in light of your long and contentious
record of rebuffing responders who don't.
But damned if you do and damned if you don't,
On 01/13/2020 06:13 AM, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, at 11:52, Richard Owlett wrote:
I was looking for a description of what Pluma was trying to accomplish
by their highlighting rules.
Do you understand the purpose of syntax highlighting (in general)?
Yes. Its specific goal is
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, at 11:52, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I was looking for a description of what Pluma was trying to accomplish
> by their highlighting rules.
Do you understand the purpose of syntax highlighting (in general)?
(It's to /aid/ a programmer, reducing the chance of them making silly
On 01/12/2020 07:40 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2020-01-12, Richard Owlett wrote:
I am NOT interested in adding any new features.
What are the default rules for a file with extension 'sh'?
TIA
As pluma is a gedit fork as well as a gtk application I suppose it gets
its syntax highlighting rules from h
On 01/12/2020 01:20 PM, David Wright wrote:
" "
Please read post before replying.
That *INCLUDES* Subject.
On Sun 12 Jan 2020 at 06:59:07 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm attempting to understand a shell script.
> Pluma is apparently highlighting it based on the file extension (which
> is 'sh').
>
> I thought I understood what its highlighting meant.
> I didn't ;{
Then you might start at
https://e
On 1/12/20 5:59 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm attempting to understand a shell script.
> to add highlighting which Pluma does not provide by default.
A bit OT reply: vim does do highlighting that makes some sense (to me),
in sh and Python, anyway.
--
Glenn English
On 2020-01-12, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I am NOT interested in adding any new features.
> What are the default rules for a file with extension 'sh'?
> TIA
As pluma is a gedit fork as well as a gtk application I suppose it gets
its syntax highlighting rules from here (on Stretch):
/usr/share/gt
I'm attempting to understand a shell script.
Pluma is apparently highlighting it based on the file extension (which
is 'sh').
I thought I understood what its highlighting meant.
I didn't ;{
I attempted to do a web search and got primarily hits on people wishing
to add highlighting which Pluma
15 matches
Mail list logo
