Re: Portforwarding

2001-09-28 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Jan Tammen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010928 11:28]: > Hello, > I'm using potato and kernel 2.4.8. I'm trying to map some ports to a > client inside my NAT-network. So far i'm using this, but it seems to > have no effect: > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i mydevice --dport -j DNAT --to >

Re: Portforwarding

2001-09-28 Thread Sean Quinlan
--- Jan Tammen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2001-09-28 19:30): > I'm using potato and kernel 2.4.8. I'm trying to map some ports to a > client inside my NAT-network. So far i'm using this, but it seems to > have no effect: > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i mydevice --dport -j DNAT --to > cl

Re: Portforwarding

2001-09-28 Thread Jason Boxman
On Friday 28 September 2001 02:28 pm, Jan Tammen wrote: > Hello, > I'm using potato and kernel 2.4.8. I'm trying to map some ports to a > client inside my NAT-network. So far i'm using this, but it seems to > have no effect: > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i mydevice --dport -j DNAT

Portforwarding

2001-09-28 Thread Jan Tammen
Hello, I'm using potato and kernel 2.4.8. I'm trying to map some ports to a client inside my NAT-network. So far i'm using this, but it seems to have no effect: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i mydevice --dport -j DNAT --to client_ip: ... and so on, and then: iptables -A FORWARD

Re: portforwarding question

1999-03-09 Thread whbell
Ralf, That takes of this issue then. I added a port of my choosing to the /etc/services and everything is working as expected. Yesterday I did the same trial with forwarding port 80 to the internal service. It was successful for me though, (of course my real site was gone). Are you asking for

Re: portforwarding question

1999-03-09 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
Hi Bill, On Tue, 09 Mar 1999 13:59:19 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >You are correct in the assumption of using port 8080 below. That is >exactly what I am doing now, (it works great BTW!). Is 8080 the Nice for you. I also tried to forward port 80 to an internal host, but I wasn't as succes

Re: portforwarding question

1999-03-09 Thread whbell
world. Of course this is using xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80. > >> > >> I also have an internal web site visible to the world > >> using portforwarding xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:. > >> > >> Question 1- Which port(s) should I forward to allow > >> this visibility and not over

Re: portforwarding question

1999-03-09 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Tue, 09 Mar 1999 09:31:04 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I have a web site on my Debian box visible to the >> world. Of course this is using xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80. >> >> I also have an internal web site visible to the world >> using portforwarding xxx.xxx.xxx.

Re: portforwarding question

1999-03-09 Thread whbell
Anyone? I will try one more post with these questions. Thanks, -Bill > Hello again, > > I have a web site on my Debian box visible to the > world. Of course this is using xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80. > > I also have an internal web site visible to the world > using portforwa

portforwarding question

1999-03-08 Thread whbell
Hello again, I have a web site on my Debian box visible to the world. Of course this is using xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80. I also have an internal web site visible to the world using portforwarding xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:. Question 1- Which port(s) should I forward to allow this visibility and not overrun my