On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 10:07:13AM -0700, Walter Reed wrote:
| On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:00:39AM -0500, dman wrote:
| snip snip
| No. Only if they choose to. They _could_ be checking an inputs RBL
| and denying them the ability to abuse the swbell system like that.
|
| | I have a whole
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:53:58PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
| On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:02:34AM -0500, dman wrote:
| sa-exim :-).
|
| http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html
|
| Whoa! That should be a Debian package (maybe the default MTA).
I just thought I'd announce some
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:25:09AM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| Spam is not new. Everyone knows it's a problem. There is no excuse
| anymore to be ignorant.
I recently learned something about open relays. Installing anti-virus
software (eg Norton) on your MS server (that isn't an
hi ya paul
yes i hit one too many deletes too . at least wasn't too
bad of a delete that i could get the email resent... etc
- am not as worried about fat pipe .. as opposed to
accidental deletes...
- reporting the spam is where it gets expensive real fast...
-- few apps
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 08:54:25PM -0500, Gary Turner wrote:
[much snippage]
| I went to dsbl.org and found that they tested
| positive for multi-hop and unconfirmed for single-hop.
Actually, that's not what unconfirmed means. Unconfirmed simply
means that someone who isn't 'trusted' caused the
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 08:31:28PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
| On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 08:54:25PM -0500, Gary Turner wrote:
| What gets me is RBL bounces provide information on what happened,
| give you a URL for more information *and* an email address to bitch
| at.
Actually, only the decent
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:36:30PM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
- am not as worried about fat pipe .. as opposed to
accidental deletes...
Rare. 0% in the last two days (though the ATT and Charter ones might
be legit, but doubtful, they're fairly regular spam sources when I
decide to comment out
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:02:34AM -0500, dman wrote:
sa-exim :-).
http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html
Whoa! That should be a Debian package (maybe the default MTA).
--
Baloo
pgpm6EOjd1tOS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:00:39AM -0500, dman wrote:
snip snip
No. Only if they choose to. They _could_ be checking an inputs RBL
and denying them the ability to abuse the swbell system like that.
| I have a whole sh*t pot full of filter defs.
Spamassassin is much more effective than
Hi all,
I have a Debian GNU/Linux potato server with exim configured.
I received a strange message. What can be wrong?
TIA,Paulo Henrique.
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
A message that you sent could not be
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 05:19:54PM +, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
wrote:
Hi all,
I have a Debian GNU/Linux potato server with exim configured.
I received a strange message. What can be wrong?
TIA,Paulo Henrique.
This message was created
On Fri, 31 May 2002 14:00:44 -0700, Walter Reed wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 05:19:54PM +, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
wrote:
Hi all,
I have a Debian GNU/Linux potato server with exim configured.
I received a strange message. What can be wrong?
TIA,
hi ya gary
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
host mail.otherdomain.net [otherip.otherip.otherip.otherip]: 550
5.7.1 Mail from myip.myip.myip.myip
refused by blackhole site dnsbl.njabl.org
see
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 08:54:25PM -0500, Gary Turner wrote:
these BLs. I was going to say that any ISP the size of swbell.net would
have a lot of innocents, but a search of the last 4200 posts just finds
me 8-P
So bitch at SW Bell to respond faster to spam complaints. Not
responding fast
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 07:26:18PM -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
- its still cheaper/faster in the long run to hit the delete key
Faster? Yes. Cheaper? There's long shots measured in light-years
shorter than that. You think disk space and bandwidth are free? If
you've found a place that'll
15 matches
Mail list logo