Re: Potato and egcs

1999-04-05 Thread Stephen Pitts
On Sun, Apr 04, 1999 at 09:13:47PM -0700, George Bonser wrote: > On Sun, 4 Apr 1999, Stephen Pitts wrote: > > > First, don't complain. One of the listed goals for potato on > > debian-devel (you do read that, don't you? potato is a DEVELOPERS RELEASE) > I was under the impression that there are

Re: Potato and egcs

1999-04-05 Thread Stephen Pitts
On Sat, Apr 03, 1999 at 12:18:50AM -0800, George Bonser wrote: > > Ok, whose big idea was it not to provide a real gcc in potato? Maybe it > is me but I couldn't find one. I did an auto-upgrade and broke my ability > to compile 2.0.27-pre kernels cleanly. > > I don't mind being offered egcs but

Re: Potato and egcs

1999-04-03 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Sat, Apr 03, 1999 at 03:11:50 -0800, George Bonser wrote: > On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, J.H.M. Dassen wrote: > > 2.2.x is the latest kernel. > > But 2.0.37 has newer drivers than Linus' 2.2 releases ... maybe I should > be using the ac stuff? At the moment, I trust Alan's patches more than Linus' rele

Re: Potato and egcs

1999-04-03 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Sat, Apr 03, 1999 at 00:18:50 -0800, George Bonser wrote: > Ok, whose big idea was it not to provide a real gcc in potato? Fully switching to EGCS has been planned for potato for quite some time now. > Maybe it is me but I couldn't find one. There isn't one, yet. We're working on building on