peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> man update-alternatives has no mention of how the priorities of
> alternatives originate. The most reasonable explanation I can
> imagine is that any new alternative is assigned a lower priority
> than extant alternatives. Correct?
The package postinst script will i
peasth...@shaw.ca writes:
> man update-alternatives has no mention of how the priorities of
> alternatives originate. The most reasonable explanation I can
> imagine is that any new alternative is assigned a lower priority
> than extant alternatives. Correct?
>
The packager chooses the prior
man update-alternatives has no mention of how the priorities of
alternatives originate. The most reasonable explanation I can
imagine is that any new alternative is assigned a lower priority
than extant alternatives. Correct?
My example from last July.
peter@dalton:~$ update-alternatives --di
3 matches
Mail list logo
