On Jun 2, 2012 7:51 AM, Aubrey Raech aubreyra...@gmail.com wrote:
Any and all advice/recommendations are appreciated!
You could have a look at retroshare and tonido.
Both are not in Debian repositories.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:24:22 -0500 Christofer C. Bell
christofer.c.b...@gmail.com napísal:
The point, however, is that there is no file transfer method that
meets her requirements.
1. No dedicated server (no web, no sftp, no ftp, NFS, Samba, etc).
2. No usernames/logins (no sftp,
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote:
I agree with using ssh, but I'd configure it to force sftp upon login
like this:
I figured I'd frighten the OP if I added too much complexity.
It's simpler to just AllowUsers user1 user2 user3
Fair point in the circumstances.
6. Make sure that your
Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
ssh is a waste of time and effort in the circumstances as we know them.
I wasn't suggesting ssh as an application. I was recommending ssh as
a transport, on which one would layer an application such as WinSCP
or FileZilla.
But others are already making this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:07:15 -0400
Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
here's another interesting one:
http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
From the description:
---
Woof (Web Offer One File) tries a different
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 23:16:09 +0100
Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 15:27:15 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Brian wrote:
I guess it depends on which packages you tell the installer to
load. One of the options is web
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:28:22 +0100
Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 09:34:55 -0500, green wrote:
Brian, you seem to be assuming that the router has a public IP (on
the WAN side), which is often not true. Unfortunately,
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 18:10:53 +0300
Mika Suomalainen mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote:
On 02.06.2012 09:21, Aubrey Raech wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:08:44 +0200
Tom Rausner t...@rausner.dk wrote:
Dropbox ?
Ah, and avoiding third-party servers was also a hopeful :-/ I'd
prefer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:16:19 +0100
Chris Davies chris-use...@roaima.co.uk wrote:
Aubrey Raech aubreyra...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for
email to a friend directly [...]
1. Not a proper server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:24:22 -0500
Christofer C. Bell christofer.c.b...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
That said, there have been a number of suggestions towards modifying
the OP's requirements and I'm interested in seeing the reasoning
behind the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 08:41:40 +0100
Chris Davies chris-use...@roaima.co.uk wrote:
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote:
I agree with using ssh, but I'd configure it to force sftp upon
login like this:
I figured I'd frighten the OP if I added too
Aubrey Raech wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:07:15 -0400
Miles Fidelmanmfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
here's another interesting one:
http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
Woof is excellent! Woof's also in the debian package repositories, as
is fex (from your previous message).
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 08:41:40AM +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote:
I agree with using ssh, but I'd configure it to force sftp upon login
like this:
I figured I'd frighten the OP if I added too much complexity.
Fair enough!
It's simpler to just AllowUsers
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:31:02AM -0700, Aubrey Raech wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:16:19 +0100
Chris Davies chris-use...@roaima.co.uk wrote:
7. Use rsync (over ssh) or sftp to copy the files. Remember to tell
them to use port 10022 (or whatever you decided in #1) instead of the
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:51:12 -0700, Aubrey Raech wrote:
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a program that I could use
for direct transfer,
On Sun 03 Jun 2012 at 02:28:43 -0700, Aubrey Raech wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:07:15 -0400
Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
here's another interesting one:
http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
From the description:
---
Woof (Web Offer One File)
Dropbox ?
On Jun 2, 2012 7:51 AM, Aubrey Raech aubreyra...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Debian users!
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
similar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:08:44 +0200
Tom Rausner t...@rausner.dk wrote:
Dropbox ?
Ah, and avoiding third-party servers was also a hopeful :-/ I'd prefer
not to have my files out there on the web... more of a direct
person-to-person transfer.
I've
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:08:44AM BST, Tom Rausner wrote:
Dropbox ?
OP explicitly mentioned direct so it rules Dropbox out.
Dropbox is closed source and only works on Intel-compatible platform
so it rules it out for me for example.
nc (netcat) is what the user is looking for.
Cheers,
--
rjc
On Fri 01 Jun 2012 at 22:51:12 -0700, Aubrey Raech wrote:
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a program that I could use
for direct transfer,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Aubrey,
Aubrey Raech aubreyra...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
2. No usernames? (scp, rsync)
3. Preferably does not require a chat protocol (XMPP, IRC's DCC)
- From what I can find it seems like XMPP would probably
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 12:41:22 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Aubrey Raech aubreyra...@gmail.com wrote:
Any and all advice/recommendations are appreciated!
Do you have a have public IP address (either IPv4 or IPv6)? If
that is not the case, you will need a third party in order to
Aubrey Raech wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Debian users!
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a program that I could
Hello Brian,
Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 12:41:22 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Do you have a have public IP address (either IPv4 or IPv6)? If
that is not the case, you will need a third party in order to
establish the connection.
A third party is not
On 02.06.2012 09:21, Aubrey Raech wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:08:44 +0200
Tom Rausner t...@rausner.dk wrote:
Dropbox ?
Ah, and avoiding third-party servers was also a hopeful :-/ I'd prefer
not to have my files out there on the web... more of a direct
person-to-person transfer.
I've
Aubrey Raech aubreyra...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly [...]
1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
2. No usernames? (scp, rsync)
3. Preferably does not require a chat protocol (XMPP, IRC's DCC)
- From what I can find
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Aubrey Raech wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Debian users!
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 15:16:19 +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
Yes. A proper server (http, ftp, ssh) would satisfy this requirement
but you've excluded those with #1, #2. If your PCs can have Internet
facing ports configured, I'd go for ssh/rsync every time.
I have a similar, if not exactly the
On Sb, 02 iun 12, 16:02:05, Claudius Hubig wrote:
No. I was not referring to a static but to a public IP address. If
the user has a public, i. e. internet-routable IP address, everything
is fine, even if it is not static. However, if the user sits behind a
NAT or something similar that
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 09:14:12 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Aubrey Raech wrote:
1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
Pretty much all modern o/s's come with both a web server and ftp
pre-installed. It's a matter of turning them on, and configuring them
(if your target is running a GUI,
Brian wrote at 2012-06-02 08:13 -0500:
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 12:41:22 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Do you have a have public IP address (either IPv4 or IPv6)? If
that is not the case, you will need a third party in order to
establish the connection.
A third party is not required. For the
Andrei POPESCU wrote at 2012-06-02 13:34 -0500:
On Sb, 02 iun 12, 16:02:05, Claudius Hubig wrote:
No. I was not referring to a static but to a public IP address. If
the user has a public, i. e. internet-routable IP address, everything
is fine, even if it is not static. However, if the user
Brian wrote:
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 09:14:12 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Aubrey Raech wrote:
1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
Pretty much all modern o/s's come with both a web server and ftp
pre-installed. It's a matter of turning them on, and configuring them
(if your target is running a
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 09:34:55 -0500, green wrote:
Brian, you seem to be assuming that the router has a public IP (on the WAN
side), which is often not true. Unfortunately, many ISPs provide their
customers with only private/local IPs behind NAT; inbound connections are
therefore not
On Sb, 02 iun 12, 18:12:03, Brian wrote:
There appears to be no advantage in using sshd in this situation. The
idea of having to guide her through configuring a router and using ssh
(on a Windows machine, incidentally) doesn't bear thinking about for one
thing.
1. Why would the client have
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 15:27:15 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Brian wrote:
I guess it depends on which packages you tell the installer to load.
One of the options is web server, but I haven't set up a desktop
installation lately (all my Debian is server-side), so I'm not really
sure if
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 22:48:57 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 02 iun 12, 18:12:03, Brian wrote:
There appears to be no advantage in using sshd in this situation. The
idea of having to guide her through configuring a router and using ssh
(on a Windows machine, incidentally) doesn't
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 22:48:57 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 02 iun 12, 18:12:03, Brian wrote:
There appears to be no advantage in using sshd in this situation. The
idea of having to guide her through configuring a
Brian wrote:
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 22:48:57 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 02 iun 12, 18:12:03, Brian wrote:
There appears to be no advantage in using sshd in this situation. The
idea of having to guide her through configuring a router and using ssh
(on a Windows machine, incidentally)
Christofer C. Bell wrote:
That's just it. Using anything *other* than ssh is a waste of time
and effort most of the time as ssh requires no setup and effort to
use out of the box not only in Debian but any modern Linux/Unix.
*Everything else* requires effort to setup and use.
The point,
here's another interesting one:
http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
From the description:
---
Woof (Web Offer One File) tries a different approach. It assumes that
everybody has a web-browser or a commandline web-client installed. Woof
is a small simple stupid webserver that can
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:16:19PM +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
Aubrey Raech aubreyra...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly [...]
1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
2. No usernames? (scp, rsync)
3. Preferably does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Debian users!
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a program that I could use
for direct
43 matches
Mail list logo
