On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Chris Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 02:27:28PM EST, François Cerbelle wrote:
Patrick Wiseman a écrit :
...
And why do you send message in text+HTML format to this list ? ;-)
Yeah .. it took me a while to figure out how I could get
Ron Johnson wrote:
According to the upstream website (and which I confirmed myself), using
v0.3.0 with emails stored in IMAP kills Tbird as soon as you click on
Replt-To-List.
Actually here it doesn't kill TBird, it just doesn't work. At all. I
found 0.2.0 on the addon site but it, too,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:16:03PM EST, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Chris Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 02:27:28PM EST, François Cerbelle wrote:
Patrick Wiseman a écrit :
...
And why do you send message in text+HTML format to this
François Cerbelle wrote:
A list should *NEVER* alter the contents of a message and the reply-to
field *DOES BELONGS TO THE CONTENTS* of the message.
Really? You believe that? *looks at the footer appended to every
message* Then, u, a header is the least of your concerns. I look
On 11/16/08 17:53, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
According to the upstream website (and which I confirmed myself), using
v0.3.0 with emails stored in IMAP kills Tbird as soon as you click on
Replt-To-List.
Actually here it doesn't kill TBird, it just doesn't work. At all. I
found
On 11/16/08 13:28, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
François Cerbelle wrote:
A list should *NEVER* alter the contents of a message and the
reply-to field *DOES BELONGS TO THE CONTENTS* of the message.
What happens if one of the subscribers does want to have a reply on a
specific address ? It is
Steve Lamb a écrit :
François Cerbelle wrote:
A list should *NEVER* alter the contents of a message and the reply-to
field *DOES BELONGS TO THE CONTENTS* of the message.
Really? You believe that? *looks at the footer appended to every
message* Then, u, a header is the least of
On 11/17/08 00:33, François Cerbelle wrote:
Steve Lamb a écrit :
François Cerbelle wrote:
A list should *NEVER* alter the contents of a message and the reply-to
field *DOES BELONGS TO THE CONTENTS* of the message.
Really? You believe that? *looks at the footer appended to every
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the Debian
mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless they requested
it. Is that correct?
I only ask because I've been getting a lot of CCs recently and I really,
really don't want them. I check the list every time I
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the Debian
mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless they requested
it. Is that correct?
Yup.
I only ask because I've been getting a lot of CCs recently and I really,
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the
Debian mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless they
requested it. Is that correct?
Yup.
I only ask because I've been getting a lot of CCs
On 11/15/08 21:13, Mark Allums wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the
Debian mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless they
requested it. Is that correct?
Yup.
I only ask
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the Debian
mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless they requested it.
Is that correct?
Yup.
On Saturday 15 November 2008, Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the
Debian
On 11/15/08 21:21, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the Debian
mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 15 November 2008, Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 15 November 2008, Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/15/08 21:13, Mark Allums wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the
Debian mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless they
requested it. Is that correct?
On 11/15/08 22:26, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 15 November 2008, Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:33:43 -0600
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The most common MUAs (and all webmail) don't allow Reply-to to be
set to anything other than what the application thinks it should be.
Do you mean that MUAs don't allow the sender to set a custom Reply-to?
Sylpheed
On 11/16/08 00:30, Mark Allums wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/15/08 21:13, Mark Allums wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/15/08 13:43, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I was fairly sure that the policy for this list, and most of the
Debian mailing lists was to NOT CC the poster in replies unless
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 09:19:58PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Besides:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send
a carbon copy (CC) to the original poster unless they
explicitly request to be copied.
might it help
On 11/16/08 00:43, Rob Starling wrote:
[snip]
a third line with that URL certainly wouldn't make my inbox
any more bloated. who are the admins who could do that?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
If you don't agree with me, you are worse than Hitler!!!
--
To
On 11/16/08 00:38, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:33:43 -0600
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The most common MUAs (and all webmail) don't allow Reply-to to be
set to anything other than what the application thinks it should be.
Do you mean that MUAs don't allow the sender
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
As does Mutt, and probably Evolution. But not Tbird, and certainly
not gmail. Don't know about KMail.
I can vouch that KMail does. It might be a bit hard to find, but it's
there. (Configure KMail
On 11/16/08 01:20, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
As does Mutt, and probably Evolution. But not Tbird, and certainly
not gmail. Don't know about KMail.
I can vouch that KMail does. It might be a bit
On Saturday 15 November 2008, Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.htmlhttp://wooz
le.org/%7Eneale/papers/reply-to-still
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: Q: List Policy':
and certainly
not gmail.
I found it in my gmail settings: Settings - Accounts Tab - Reply-to
Address (Optional)
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
