Dom writes:
Now here's the thing. I did the install, got the warning from the
meta-package (linux-image-2.6-686), and the kernel installed - as you
said.
I then rebooted and... it works fine.
It happened to me too!
--
Alberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Dom writes:
Now here's the thing. I did the install, got the warning from the
meta-package (linux-image-2.6-686), and the kernel installed - as you
said.
I then rebooted and... it works fine.
It happened to me too!
Wow! You
Camaleón writes:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Dom writes:
Now here's the thing. I did the install, got the warning from the
meta-package (linux-image-2.6-686), and the kernel installed - as you
said.
I then rebooted and... it works fine.
It happened to me
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:06:33 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
(...)
But just out of curiosity, what's the raw logic behind the routine that
decided to install a PAE kernel instead another one? Why the installer
took such option? :-?
It didn't.
Well, it did.
The following NEW packages will
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:21:48 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Camaleón writes:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Dom writes:
Now here's the thing. I did the install, got the warning from the
meta-package (linux-image-2.6-686), and the kernel installed - as you
said.
On 22/06/11 12:10, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Dom writes:
Now here's the thing. I did the install, got the warning from the
meta-package (linux-image-2.6-686), and the kernel installed - as you
said.
I then rebooted and... it works fine.
It
On 22/06/11 12:21, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:06:33 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
(...)
But just out of curiosity, what's the raw logic behind the routine that
decided to install a PAE kernel instead another one? Why the installer
took such option? :-?
It didn't.
Well, it did.
On 2011-06-22 13:21 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:06:33 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
(...)
But just out of curiosity, what's the raw logic behind the routine that
decided to install a PAE kernel instead another one? Why the installer
took such option? :-?
It didn't.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:16:10 +0100, Dom wrote:
On 22/06/11 12:10, Camaleón wrote:
Now seriously, how can be that?
I know there were a set of Pentium M processors models that had enabled
PAE/NX but if that's the case, cpuinfo should expose both flags (pae
and nx), which is not the case.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:54:37 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-06-22 13:21 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:06:33 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
(...)
But just out of curiosity, what's the raw logic behind the routine
that decided to install a PAE kernel instead another one?
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:51:49 +0100, Dom wrote:
On 22/06/11 12:21, Camaleón wrote:
It decided to install the PAE kernel instead the 486 (non-PAE). Why? As
I hadn't installed a linux-image-2.6-686-pae previously I'd expected
a non-PAE update, and given that -686 was not available, -486
seemed
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 05:44 +0100, Dom wrote:
On 21/06/11 18:52, Camaleón wrote:
[...]
Now here's the thing. I did the install, got the warning from the
meta-package (linux-image-2.6-686), and the kernel installed - as you said.
I then rebooted and... it works fine.
Not quite... in my
Hello,
On my testing VM machine, I'm currently running:
root@debian:~# uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.38-2-686 #1 SMP Sun May 8 14:49:45 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
Today, I've just run a dist-upgrade and see this:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
linux-image-2.6.39-2-686-pae (2.6.39-2)
On 06/21/2011 10:59 AM, Camaleón wrote:
But now the day has come and I've got two questions:
1. Will the PAE kernel work on this VM? I guess no.
2. Shouldn't the dist-upgrade routine had to automatically determine the
best kernel for this system? Or at least provide some kind of warning? I
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:16:02 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
On 06/21/2011 10:59 AM, Camaleón wrote:
But now the day has come and I've got two questions:
1. Will the PAE kernel work on this VM? I guess no.
2. Shouldn't the dist-upgrade routine had to automatically determine
the best kernel
On 21/06/11 17:33, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:16:02 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
On 06/21/2011 10:59 AM, Camaleón wrote:
But now the day has come and I've got two questions:
1. Will the PAE kernel work on this VM? I guess no.
2. Shouldn't the dist-upgrade routine had to
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:22:48 +0100, Dom wrote:
On 21/06/11 17:33, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:16:02 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
(...)
Aptitude was nice to me.
Yep, I also think so. But I wondered how apt-get dist-upgrade would
handle this sitution. I bet that it will report
On 06/21/2011 01:52 PM, Camaleón wrote:
Well, if you agree with the update, the pae kernel installs despite it
warns about it will not work (and when you boot with it, it fails as
expected). You can still boot with the old kernel (good job!).
So in the end you need to manually remove the pae
On 2011-06-21 19:52 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
Well, if you agree with the update, the pae kernel installs despite it
warns about it will not work (and when you boot with it, it fails as
expected). You can still boot with the old kernel (good job!).
So in the end you need to manually remove
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:13:06 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-06-21 19:52 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
Well, if you agree with the update, the pae kernel installs despite it
warns about it will not work (and when you boot with it, it fails as
expected). You can still boot with the old kernel
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:05:04 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
On 06/21/2011 01:52 PM, Camaleón wrote:
So in the end you need to manually remove the pae kernel and install
the 486, as Gilbert suggested.
I still think this should have been automagically done by the upgrade.
Why proceed with
On 2011-06-21 20:37 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:13:06 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-06-21 19:52 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
Well, if you agree with the update, the pae kernel installs despite it
warns about it will not work (and when you boot with it, it fails as
On 21/06/11 18:52, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:22:48 +0100, Dom wrote:
I'll find that out what apt does tomorrow when I try to upgrade my main
laptop which doesn't have pae support, and will report the results.
I'll give you some tips as I couldn't retain my self and performed
23 matches
Mail list logo
