El lunes, 29 de septiembre de 2003, a las 04:41, Pigeon escribe:
> I know; see my next paragraph... I'm pointing out that the system is
> not necessarily "magically" secure if not used with the intended
> rigour, as may be the case on a mailing list environment, or if
> outhouse excess supported pg
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:57:25PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> El domingo, 28 de septiembre de 2003, a las 17:38, Pigeon escribe:
> > OK, the fake key will have a different fingerprint, but given that
> > Roberto has said he's experimenting with gpg, suddenly finding a new
> > key woul
Jacob Anawalt wrote:
I was going to try enigma. Do you remember clicking on something to send
the key to the server, or did it do that on it's own to be 'helpful'?
Playing with Kgpg it didn't show me the first test key I made until I
made a second one when I didn't have any in my account. I hop
El domingo, 28 de septiembre de 2003, a las 17:38, Pigeon escribe:
> OK, the fake key will have a different fingerprint, but given that
> Roberto has said he's experimenting with gpg, suddenly finding a new
> key wouldn't be too surprising.
No public keys are trusted by default. I won't trust a si
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 02:03:07AM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
> Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> >I just started playing with GPG today. Can't you tell? :-)
> >
> >Anyhow. I generated bunches of keys trying to get Enigmail to play nice
> >with Thunderbird and also with gpg on the command line.
> >
> >Whe
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 06:32:22PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> | Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> |
> |>Is there a way to get rid of them from the keyservers?
> |
> |
> | Unless you have revocation certificates for them (what I doubt),
> | no, no way...
>
> No. I hadn't re
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
I just started playing with GPG today. Can't you tell? :-)
Anyhow. I generated bunches of keys trying to get Enigmail to play nice
with Thunderbird and also with gpg on the command line.
When I finally got around to the part of the HowTo on searching for keys
(of course I
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just started playing with GPG today. Can't you tell? :-)
Anyhow. I generated bunches of keys trying to get Enigmail to play nice
with Thunderbird and also with gpg on the command line.
When I finally got around to the part o
El sábado, 27 de septiembre de 2003, a las 17:53, Roberto Sanchez escribe:
> I just started playing with GPG today. Can't you tell? :-)
Yes, I can tell, indeed your message was very useful for me in order
to test a procmail rule that make signatures generated by your
Enigmail play nice with my mu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Roberto Sanchez wrote:
|
|>When I finally got around to the part of the HowTo on searching for keys
|>(of course I did not read through all the way before starting), I
|>searched for my key. It turns out that at some poi
Hi,
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> When I finally got around to the part of the HowTo on searching for keys
> (of course I did not read through all the way before starting), I
> searched for my key. It turns out that at some point all my keys (3 in
> all) were exported. The problem is that I had alrea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just started playing with GPG today. Can't you tell? :-)
Anyhow. I generated bunches of keys trying to get Enigmail to play nice
with Thunderbird and also with gpg on the command line.
When I finally got around to the part of the HowTo on searching
12 matches
Mail list logo
