On Friday 20 May 2016 18:08:37 Rodary Jacques wrote:
> I read quite a lot of the answers to your post, and I still think there is
> a problem, not linked to the kernel's interface name name. I have a wifi
> interface named *everywhere* wlan0. It isn't found by network-pre.target,
> network-target
I read quite a lot of the answers to your post, and I still think there is a
problem, not
linked to the kernel's interface name name. I have a wifi interface named
*everywhere*
wlan0. It isn't found by network-pre.target, network-target or
networking-service, I
don't know which one. What I k
On 2016-05-18, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> *exactly* those devices tagged as "auto" in /etc/network/interfaces.
>>
>> So that should be the database you're looking for? Try, for starters
>>
>> grep auto /etc/network/interfaces
>
> auto lo eth0 eth1
>
> Its there in the complete interfaces file I just
On Wed 18 May 2016 at 12:32:24 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 18 May 2016 at 17:39:45 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 18 May 2016 at 10:44:40 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed 18 May 2016 at 10:56:01 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > >
> > > > auto lo eth0 eth1
> > >
> > > Agre
On Wed 18 May 2016 at 17:39:45 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> On Wed 18 May 2016 at 10:44:40 -0500, David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Wed 18 May 2016 at 10:56:01 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > auto lo eth0 eth1
> >
> > Agree with Lisi, I've never seen this (though I'm not claiming it's
> > either
On Wed 18 May 2016 at 10:50:23 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:22:29AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 17 May 2016 at 11:26:28 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
What was snipped is "I do not see that as a disadvantage, udev can do
that much unwanted damage
On Wed 18 May 2016 at 10:44:40 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 18 May 2016 at 10:56:01 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > auto lo eth0 eth1
>
> Agree with Lisi, I've never seen this (though I'm not claiming it's
> either wrong or harmful).
It's an ok line. From interfaces(5):
Lines beg
On Wednesday 18 May 2016 16:54:49 Gene Heskett wrote:
> "auto lo eth0"
auto lo
and
auto eth0
now??
Lisi
It may not solve anything, but when rationality seems to fail one has to
resort to magic, and just get the incantation right
Lisi
On Wednesday 18 May 2016 11:37:59 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 May 2016 16:14:36 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > auto lo eth0 eth1
> >
> > Its there in the complete interfaces file I just posted, and you
> > snipped.
>
> Gene - we have, I think, established that your set-up doesn't work the
> way p
On Wed 18 May 2016 at 10:56:01 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 May 2016 07:31:34 Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > * Gilles Mocellin [2016-05-17 19:09
> +0200]:
> > > > Le 17/05/2016 à 14:34, Mimiko a écrit :
> > > > > On 17.05
On Wednesday 18 May 2016 16:14:36 Gene Heskett wrote:
> auto lo eth0 eth1
>
> Its there in the complete interfaces file I just posted, and you snipped.
Gene - we have, I think, established that your set-up doesn't work the way
predicted.
The one thing that looks very different to me is the stick
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:56:01AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 18 May 2016 07:31:34 Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Gilles Mocellin [2016-05-17 19:09
+0200]:
> > Le 17/05/2016 à 14:34, Mimiko a écrit :
> > > On 17.05.2016 15:16, Eli
On Wednesday 18 May 2016 11:01:39 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:56:01AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 May 2016 07:31:34 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > > * Gilles Mocellin [2016-05-17
> > > > 19:09
> >
On Wednesday 18 May 2016 07:31:34 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * Gilles Mocellin [2016-05-17 19:09
+0200]:
> > > Le 17/05/2016 à 14:34, Mimiko a écrit :
> > > > On 17.05.2016 15:16, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > > > Ask your search engine: "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:56:01AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 May 2016 07:31:34 Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > * Gilles Mocellin [2016-05-17 19:09
> +0200]:
> > > > Le 17/05/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:42:27PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Lisi Reisz [2016-05-18 12:31 +0100]:
>
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> [...]
> > > /etc/init.d/networking stop does ifdown -a
> > > /etc/init.d/ne
On Wednesday 18 May 2016 14:42:27 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Lisi Reisz [2016-05-18 12:31 +0100]:
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > /etc/init.d/networking stop does ifdown -a
> > > /etc/init.d/networking start does ifup -a
> >
> > But
> > # ifdown -
* Lisi Reisz [2016-05-18 12:31 +0100]:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
> > /etc/init.d/networking stop does ifdown -a
> > /etc/init.d/networking start does ifup -a
>
> But
> # ifdown -a; ifup -a
> is much more elegant!!
I would use '&&' in favour of ';' as ';'
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 18:29:36 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Gilles Mocellin [2016-05-17 19:09 +0200]:
> > Le 17/05/2016 à 14:34, Mimiko a écrit :
> > > On 17.05.2016 15:16, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > > Ask your search engine: "init.d/networking restart is deprecated"
> > >
> > > This was th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:22:29AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 17 May 2016 at 11:26:28 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> You don't see any disadvantage to removing the "hotplug stuff".
> Hooray, let's go back to PCs as static boxes. Shut i
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 19:30:06 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2016 23:43:08 Gene Heskett wrote:
> [snip]
>
> If it ain't broke, hit it with a hammer? ;-)
>
> Lisi
Yup, have you got a bigger one my lady?
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soa
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 23:43:08 Gene Heskett wrote:
[snip]
If it ain't broke, hit it with a hammer? ;-)
Lisi
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 15:25:47 Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi Gene,
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:12:45PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Configuring interface eth1=eth1 (inet)
> > run-parts --verbose /etc/network/if-pre-up.d
> > run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/wireless-tools
> > run-parts:
On Tue 17 May 2016 at 14:51:57 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> Interesting is that in a man 5 interfaces, it says the gateway address is
> colon delimited. I don't recall ever seeing that since my first install
> in early 1998. Does anyone ever actually read these man pages but me?
Yes, but I h
Hi Gene,
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:12:45PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Configuring interface eth1=eth1 (inet)
> run-parts --verbose /etc/network/if-pre-up.d
> run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/wireless-tools
> run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/wpasupplicant
> ip addr add
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 13:26:35 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Gene Heskett [2016-05-17 11:26 -0400]:
>
> [...]
>
> > Because of some rare condition, you make
> > all the other users with a less rare condition suffer?
>
> I was just talking about facts, nothing else. If you open
> /etc/init.d/netw
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 13:09:33 Gilles Mocellin wrote:
> Le 17/05/2016 à 14:34, Mimiko a écrit :
> > On 17.05.2016 15:16, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> >> Ask your search engine: "init.d/networking restart is deprecated"
> >
> > This was the only tool to fully restart all networking even the
> > int
On Tue 17 May 2016 at 16:38:52 (+0200), Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Gene Heskett [2016-05-17 09:56 -0400]:
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 09:08:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> [...]
> > > In my opinion, a warning is in order ("this might not be doing
> > > what you think it does"), but deprecated seems
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 12:22:29 David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 17 May 2016 at 11:26:28 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 10:38:52 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > * Gene Heskett [2016-05-17 09:56 -0400]:
> > > > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 09:08:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > >
> >
* Gilles Mocellin [2016-05-17 19:09 +0200]:
> Le 17/05/2016 à 14:34, Mimiko a écrit :
> > On 17.05.2016 15:16, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > Ask your search engine: "init.d/networking restart is deprecated"
> >
> > This was the only tool to fully restart all networking even the
> > interface t
* Gene Heskett [2016-05-17 11:26 -0400]:
[...]
> Because of some rare condition, you make
> all the other users with a less rare condition suffer?
I was just talking about facts, nothing else. If you open
/etc/init.d/networking (ifupdown_0.7.8) in an editor and scroll down
to a line containing
Le 17/05/2016 à 14:34, Mimiko a écrit :
On 17.05.2016 15:16, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Ask your search engine: "init.d/networking restart is deprecated"
This was the only tool to fully restart all networking even the
interface thru which connection is made.
Are the `ifdown eth & ifup eth` th
On Tue 17 May 2016 at 11:26:28 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2016 10:38:52 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * Gene Heskett [2016-05-17 09:56 -0400]:
> > > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 09:08:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > In my opinion, a warning is in order ("this might not
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 10:38:52 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Gene Heskett [2016-05-17 09:56 -0400]:
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 09:08:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > In my opinion, a warning is in order ("this might not be doing
> > > what you think it does"), but deprecated seems ex
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 15:38:52 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Gene Heskett [2016-05-17 09:56 -0400]:
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 09:08:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > In my opinion, a warning is in order ("this might not be doing
> > > what you think it does"), but deprecated seems exa
Hi Elimar,
>> On Tuesday 17 May 2016 09:08:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>>
>[...]
>> > In my opinion, a warning is in order ("this might not be doing what
>> > you think it does"), but deprecated seems exaggerated to me.
>> >
>> > regards
>> >
>> > [1] Schocking Truth! Not everything seen on the I
* Gene Heskett [2016-05-17 09:56 -0400]:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2016 09:08:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
[...]
> > In my opinion, a warning is in order ("this might not be doing
> > what you think it does"), but deprecated seems exaggerated to me.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > [1] Schocking Truth! Not eve
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 09:08:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:16:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Ask your search engine: "init.d/networking restart is deprecated"
>
> I don't know about yours, but *my* /etc/init.d/networking is alive
> and healthy! More
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:36:58PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
> I don't understand why "init.d/networking restart is deprecated" is
> scaring off people? It is a matter of fact! Reading the results will
> give all answers a user want.
N
* to...@tuxteam.de [2016-05-17 15:08 +0200]:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:16:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Ask your search engine: "init.d/networking restart is deprecated"
>
> I don't know about yours, but *my* /etc/init.d/networking is alive
> and healthy! More to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:16:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
> Ask your search engine: "init.d/networking restart is deprecated"
I don't know about yours, but *my* /etc/init.d/networking is alive
and healthy! More to the point, it's so
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 08:16:32 Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Gene Heskett [2016-05-17 08:05 -0400]:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > 32 bit Debian wheezy, updated at least daily.
> >
> > This fact was brought to my attention because I needed a path to a
> > router I needed to do a hard reset on, and r
On 17.05.2016 15:16, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Ask your search engine: "init.d/networking restart is deprecated"
This was the only tool to fully restart all networking even the
interface thru which connection is made.
Are the `ifdown eth & ifup eth` the only option now?
--
Mimiko desu.
On Tuesday 17 May 2016 08:11:50 Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> In /etc/network/interfaces change
> allow-hotplug eth1
> to
> auto eth1
Blind as a bat, gonna have to get my cateracts fixed as I didn't see
that. I don't have the allow-hotplug line, but the auto line didn't have
eth1, added, wo
* Gene Heskett [2016-05-17 08:05 -0400]:
> Greetings all;
>
> 32 bit Debian wheezy, updated at least daily.
>
> This fact was brought to my attention because I needed a path to a router
> I needed to do a hard reset on, and reconfigure to do my stuff, but my
> normal home network isn't on the
In /etc/network/interfaces change
allow-hotplug eth1
to
auto eth1
Regards,
/peter
Am 17.05.2016 um 14:05 schrieb Gene Heskett:
> Greetings all;
>
> 32 bit Debian wheezy, updated at least daily.
>
> This fact was brought to my attention because I needed a path to a router
> I needed to
46 matches
Mail list logo
