On (31/03/04 13:35), Stefan Goessling wrote:
> Hello List!
>
> I would very much appreciate any advice concerning the set-up of a Debian
> based file server. I have some experience in Debian desktops and laptops,
> but none so far with servers. My list of questions is long, I know, but
> any answe
Stefan Goessling wrote:
Hello List!
I would very much appreciate any advice concerning the set-up of a Debian
based file server. I have some experience in Debian desktops and laptops,
but none so far with servers. My list of questions is long, I know, but
any answer would help. Thank you!
Best re
At Wednesday, 31 March 2004, Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
uk> wrote:
>On (31/03/04 13:35), Stefan Goessling wrote:
>> Hello List!
>>
>> I would very much appreciate any advice concerning the set-up
of a Debian
>> based file server. I have some experience in Debian desktops and
laptops,
>> b
Stefan Goessling wrote:
Hello List!
I would very much appreciate any advice concerning the set-up of a Debian
based file server. I have some experience in Debian desktops and laptops,
but none so far with servers. My list of questions is long, I know, but
any answer would help. Thank you!
Best reg
> On (31/03/04 13:35), Stefan Goessling wrote:
> > Which packages should I use?
> samba & nfs for file and print services. I use both but you
> could use just samba and configure the linux clients accordingly.
I was also in the process of setting up a file server to serve both
Linux+Windows box
On (01/04/04 09:24), Michael Bellears wrote:
> > On (31/03/04 13:35), Stefan Goessling wrote:
>
> > > Which packages should I use?
> > samba & nfs for file and print services. I use both but you
> > could use just samba and configure the linux clients accordingly.
>
> I was also in the process
On Wednesday 31 March 2004 15.40, Kent West wrote:
> >
> >Which Debian version?
>
> stable (woody, currently) - probably no need for the latest and
> greatest packages like you'd likely want on a workstation
You may want to use samba 3, though, as there are quite noticeable
improvements over 2.2
On Thursday 01 April 2004 01.39, Clive Menzies wrote:
> There are two reasons I use NFS:
There is one reason I'll never use NFS: authentication.
NFS 'authenticates' clients by numerical userid *only*, and restricts
access by IP address.
So, if you manage to take over the IP address of a client
Hello all!
Thank you all very much for your replies. I will try to heed your advice
and install the recommended packages.
Maybe more questions later ;-)
Greetings Stefan (debian @ goessling . de)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You may want to use samba 3, though, as there are quite noticeable
> improvements over 2.2 (provided with woody). Don't know if there's a
> backport.
backports.org has samba 3.
--
John L. Fjellstad
web: http://www.fjellstad.or
10 matches
Mail list logo