Re: Bash/Perl weirdness

2001-08-14 Thread Rebecca Dridan
As a rough guess, was that a dos/MS file? I've had very confusing scripts like that before that couldn't find /usr/bin/perl^M, because of that control character. If this was the case, putting -w after the invocation would fix it as you said. HTH Bec Personal reply as per your Reply-To On Mon

RE: Bash/Perl weirdness

2001-08-14 Thread Hamma Scott
> Someone suggested I check that my path includes . > but I thought that's what the ./ was for? Yes, you are correct and DO NOT put . in your path. There was a "rap-on-the-fingers" thread about . in your path. The Skinny:If a malicious person gets into your account and puts a function named ls in

RE: Bash/Perl weirdness

2001-08-14 Thread Eugene van Zyl
van Zyl Subject: Re: Bash/Perl weirdness [posted and mailed] 13 Aug 2001: "Eugene van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > I've got a perl script with the following permissions: > -rwxr-xr-x1 root root23980 Aug 13 15:55 data_update.pl > the first line i

Re: Bash/Perl weirdness

2001-08-13 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hallo Eugene, * Eugene schrieb: > Hi, > > Question: > I've got a perl script with the following permissions: > -rwxr-xr-x1 root root23980 Aug 13 15:55 data_update.pl > the first line in the script is: > #!/usr/bin/perl > which is where perl lives on Debian potato -> perl -V gives