Hi,
Yeah that was exactly it, I found the patch on the rage forum, applied
it to the drivers, and now everything works fine!
Thanks very much for your help!
Rus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Nick wrote:
> Sorry for chiming in late...
>
> With standard 2.4.x kernel drivers, AGP 8x isn't supported for that
> chipset,
> so 4x is strictly necessary, but I couldn't change it from the BIOS.
> However,
> there's a way around this. On the Rage3D (www.rage3d.com) board,
someone
> posted a pa
Sorry for chiming in late...
On Sunday 27 July 2003 21:41, Rus Hughes wrote:
> Nick wrote:
> > I get the same error when it comes to the board being third party, but
> > everything still works fine. I also recently upgraded to the July 22
> > driver, and it works fine too. Seems they fixed Xx supp
Nick wrote:
> I get the same error when it comes to the board being third party, but
> everything still works fine. I also recently upgraded to the July 22
> driver, and it works fine too. Seems they fixed Xx support.
>
> I don't know why you are getting that error. Did you compile agpgart
> inot
Rus Hughes wrote:
Sorry for not replying sooner but I've only just now had time to try it
out. I did exactly as you said, although they updated the driver on the
site to: Driver Version X4.2.0-2.9.13 on July 22 (I also downgraded to
the 2.4.21 kernel) and the fglrx module compiled and installed
pe
> After installing the .deb you should cd into
> /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/ and edit the file make.sh.
>
> You should see something like:
>
> # assing default location of linux kernel headers
> # *** adapt to your individual setup if needed ***
> #linuxincludes=/usr/include# no config info
On Sunday 13 July 2003 00:15, Rus Hughes wrote:
> Thanks, I just tried this and it works, which is great! \o/ The
> performance is utterly lousy though, moving windows about and scrolling
> in epiphany etc but I assume the DRI thing will sort that out if I get
> it sussed.
Did you leave "no_accel"
Rus Hughes wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a Hercules Radeon 9800 Pro running with XFree86
(version 4.2.1) in Debian Unstable. After reading the readmes, I turned
the fglrx-glc22-4.2.0-2.9.13.i586.rpm into a deb with alien and
installed it. I rolled my own kernel (2.5.73), and tried to build the
Fir
4:23
> To: Debian User Listie
> Subject: Re: Hercules 9800 Pro and XFree under unstable.
>
>
>
> Hi Yall & Rus,
>
> who is having some grief with his Radeon 9800 under Tux.
>
> Yeah, I've been down that road too & now have my 9500 Pro up with full
> 3D,
> Until you get the DRM module to compile, try
>
> Option "no_dri" "yes"
>
> and disable loading the dri module in your XF86Config. That way, it
should
> not
> be dependent on DRM.
Thanks, I just tried this and it works, which is great! \o/ The
performance is utterly lous
Hi Yall & Rus,
who is having some grief with his Radeon 9800 under Tux.
Yeah, I've been down that road too & now have my 9500 Pro up with full
3D, on a nForce2 board
[EMAIL PROTECTED] haralambos]$ glxgears
13880 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2776.000 FPS
17298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3459.600 FPS
On Saturday 12 July 2003 18:57, Rus Hughes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get a Hercules Radeon 9800 Pro running with XFree86
> (version 4.2.1) in Debian Unstable. After reading the readmes, I turned
> the fglrx-glc22-4.2.0-2.9.13.i586.rpm into a deb with alien and
> installed it. I rolled my own k
Rus Hughes wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a Hercules Radeon 9800 Pro running with XFree86
(version 4.2.1) in Debian Unstable. After reading the readmes, I turned
the fglrx-glc22-4.2.0-2.9.13.i586.rpm into a deb with alien and
installed it. I rolled my own kernel (2.5.73), and tried to build the
Fire
13 matches
Mail list logo
