On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 05:51:49 -0400
Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue August 25 2009, Micha wrote:
> > > what benefit would I get from procmail?
> >
> > 1. The ability to move from kmail to something else if you want without
> > rewriting your rules.
>
> good idea.. I like that, especially when test
On 2009-09-01 05:19, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue September 1 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
If your "person message store" is an mbox file, then I'd:
this is the part I can't figure out.. I don't have an mbox setup on kmail, I
don't see a way for it to read an mbox folder.. I tried to create an m
On Tue September 1 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
> If your "person message store" is an mbox file, then I'd:
this is the part I can't figure out.. I don't have an mbox setup on kmail, I
don't see a way for it to read an mbox folder.. I tried to create an mbox
folder in an account, but I don't see any
On 2009-09-01 04:51, Paul Cartwright wrote:
[snip]
right now, on my system I have icedove, evolution, kmail, and claws, all setup
for my local user. procmail seems to move the mail into an mbox file, and I
haven't figured out how to get any email program to read an mbox folder.
But you see,
On 2009-09-01 04:45, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue August 25 2009, Chris Jones wrote:
but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about
my 200 kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task..
As another poster hinted, this is another example of the hidden benefits
of c
On Tue August 25 2009, Micha wrote:
> > what benefit would I get from procmail?
>
> 1. The ability to move from kmail to something else if you want without
> rewriting your rules.
good idea.. I like that, especially when testing different email programs.
> 2. The ability to pull mail without havi
On Tue August 25 2009, Chris Jones wrote:
> > but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about
> > my 200 kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task..
>
> As another poster hinted, this is another example of the hidden benefits
> of cloning the Microsoft model.
I'm n
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:30:03 -0400
Chris Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:57:01PM EDT, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:32:21 +0300
> > Micha wrote:
>
> > ...
>
> > > 3. Text file with regular expression based rules that you know where
> > > it resides and can back it up and
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:30:03AM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:57:01PM EDT, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:32:21 +0300
> > Micha wrote:
>
> > ...
>
> > > 3. Text file with regular expression based rules that you know where
> > > it resides and can back it up
On 2009-08-25 23:30, Chris Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:57:01PM EDT, Celejar wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:32:21 +0300
Micha wrote:
...
3. Text file with regular expression based rules that you know where
it resides and can back it up and human read it
As the resident Sylphe
On Tue, Aug 25 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,24.Aug.09, 20:56:27, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>
>> but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about my 200
>> kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task..
>
> maildir (and procmail too as I hear, but I don't like its
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:57:01PM EDT, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:32:21 +0300
> Micha wrote:
> ...
> > 3. Text file with regular expression based rules that you know where
> > it resides and can back it up and human read it
> As the resident Sylpheed fanboy, I must point out that
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:44:57 +0300
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Ma,25.aug.09, 13:32:21, Micha wrote:
>
> > On the downside, if you want to explicitly pull mail now, pulling
> > mail from kmail doesn't pull the mail off your accounts, you need to
> > do that explicitly from the command line
>
> N
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:32:21 +0300
Micha wrote:
> On 8/24/2009 11:34 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> > On Mon August 24 2009, Micha wrote:
> >> Personally I use fetchmail + procmail to fetch and filter my mail
> >
> > I use fetchmail to pull in my mail for all my domain accounts. Kmail pulls
> > it
On 2009-08-25 18:29, Chris Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:02:44PM EDT, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-08-25 13:55, Chris Jones wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:56:27PM EDT, Paul Cartwright wrote:
[..]
but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking
about my 200 kmail f
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:02:44PM EDT, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-08-25 13:55, Chris Jones wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:56:27PM EDT, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>>
>> [..]
>>> but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking
>>> about my 200 kmail filters, I'm not sure I could
On 2009-08-25 13:55, Chris Jones wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:56:27PM EDT, Paul Cartwright wrote:
[..]
but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about
my 200 kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task..
As another poster hinted, this is another example of
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:56:27PM EDT, Paul Cartwright wrote:
[..]
> but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about
> my 200 kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task..
As another poster hinted, this is another example of the hidden benefits
of cloning the Micr
On Ma,25.aug.09, 13:32:21, Micha wrote:
> On the downside, if you want to explicitly pull mail now, pulling
> mail from kmail doesn't pull the mail off your accounts, you need to
> do that explicitly from the command line
Not very familiar with kmail, but claws-mail (sylpheed too?) has
configur
On 8/24/2009 11:34 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Mon August 24 2009, Micha wrote:
Personally I use fetchmail + procmail to fetch and filter my mail
I use fetchmail to pull in my mail for all my domain accounts. Kmail pulls it
all in via my local user. From there I have many, MANY filters to pu
On Mon,24.Aug.09, 20:56:27, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> but looking at the procmailrc( now non-existant), then thinking about my 200
> kmail filters, I'm not sure I could tackle that task..
maildir (and procmail too as I hear, but I don't like its syntax) is
*very* powerful. I recently did a major
On 2009-08-24 19:56, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Mon August 24 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
But if Paul is asking the benefit of procmail over competing MDAs
like maildrop, then the benefit is cryptic line noise a la Perl.
what I'm asking is.. will it benefit me to change the way I do email and add
> From: Paul Cartwright [mailto:a...@pcartwright.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 5:56 PM
>
> On Mon August 24 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > But if Paul is asking the benefit of procmail over competing MDAs
> > like maildrop, then the benefit is cryptic line noise a la Perl.
>
> what I'm aski
On Mon August 24 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
> But if Paul is asking the benefit of procmail over competing MDAs
> like maildrop, then the benefit is cryptic line noise a la Perl.
what I'm asking is.. will it benefit me to change the way I do email and add
another program into the mix.
right now I d
On 2009-08-24 17:11, Kevin Ross wrote:
From: Paul Cartwright [mailto:a...@pcartwright.com]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:35 PM
On Mon August 24 2009, Micha wrote:
Personally I use fetchmail + procmail to fetch and filter my mail
I use fetchmail to pull in my mail for all my domain accounts.
> From: Paul Cartwright [mailto:a...@pcartwright.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:35 PM
>
> On Mon August 24 2009, Micha wrote:
> > Personally I use fetchmail + procmail to fetch and filter my mail
>
> I use fetchmail to pull in my mail for all my domain accounts. Kmail
> pulls it
> all in
26 matches
Mail list logo
