On 05/03/2010 08:04 PM, Sam Leon wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 05/02/2010 03:24 PM, Alexander Samad wrote:
[snip]
My system used to become close to unusable on the 1st sunday of the
month when
mdadm did it resync,
That sounds... wrong, on a jillion levels.
I would rather the array fail on
Disclaimer: I'm partial to XFS
Tim Clewlow put forth on 5/1/2010 2:44 AM:
My reticence to use ext4 / xfs has been due to long cache before
write times being claimed as dangerous in the event of kernel lockup
/ power outage.
This is a problem with the Linux buffer cache implementation, not
On Friday 30 April 2010 19:10:52 Mark Allums wrote:
or even btrfs for the data directories.
While I am beginning experimenting with btrfs, I wouldn't yet use it for data
you care about.
/boot, not until/if grub2 gets support for it. Even then, boot is generally
small and not often used, so
On Sunday 02 May 2010 06:00:38 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Good hardware RAID cards are really nice and give you some features you
can't really get with md raid such as true just yank the drive tray out
hot swap capability. I've not tried it, but I've read that md raid doesn't
like it when you just
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
On Sunday 02 May 2010 06:00:38 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[snip]
Speeds on my md-RAID devices were comparable to speeds with my Areca HW RAID
controller (16-port, PCI-X/SATA, battery powered 128MB cache). Number of
On 05/02/2010 03:24 PM, Alexander Samad wrote:
[snip]
My system used to become close to unusable on the 1st sunday of the month when
mdadm did it resync,
That sounds... wrong, on a jillion levels.
--
Dissent is patriotic, remember?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 16:00 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 05/02/2010 03:24 PM, Alexander Samad wrote:
[snip]
My system used to become close to unusable on the 1st sunday of the month
when
mdadm did it resync,
That sounds... wrong, on a jillion levels.
depends
a...@max:~$ dpkg -S
On Sun May 2 2010 13:24:30 Alexander Samad wrote:
My system used to become close to unusable on the 1st sunday of the month
when mdadm did it resync, I had to write my own script so it did not do
mulitple at the
same time, turn off the hung process timer and set cpufreq to performance.
A long
On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 19:19 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
On Sun May 2 2010 13:24:30 Alexander Samad wrote:
My system used to become close to unusable on the 1st sunday of the month
when mdadm did it resync, I had to write my own script so it did not do
mulitple at the
same time, turn off the
On 4/30/2010 6:39 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/26/2010 09:29 AM, Tim Clewlow wrote:
Hi there,
I'm getting ready to build a RAID 6 with 4 x 2TB drives to start,
Since two of the drives (yes, I know the parity is striped across
all
the drives, but two drives is still the effect) are used
On 04/26/2010 09:29 AM, Tim Clewlow wrote:
Hi there,
I'm getting ready to build a RAID 6 with 4 x 2TB drives to start,
Since two of the drives (yes, I know the parity is striped across
all the drives, but two drives is still the effect) are used by
striping, RAID 6 with 4 drives doesn't
On 4/30/2010 6:39 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/26/2010 09:29 AM, Tim Clewlow wrote:
Hi there,
I'm getting ready to build a RAID 6 with 4 x 2TB drives to start,
Since two of the drives (yes, I know the parity is striped across all
the drives, but two drives is still the effect) are used by
On 04/30/2010 07:10 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]
Someone pointed out what I have come to regard as the best solution, and
that is to make /boot and / (root) and the usual suspects ext3 for
safety, and use ext4 or XFS or even btrfs for the data directories.
That's what I do. / /home are
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 20:51:18 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mike Bird put forth on 4/28/2010 5:48 PM:
On Wed April 28 2010 15:10:32 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Given the way most database engines do locking, you'll get zero
additional seek benefit on reads, and you'll take a 4x hit on writes. I
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:44:32PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Monday 26 April 2010 09:29:28 Tim Clewlow wrote:
I'm getting ready to build a RAID 6 with 4 x 2TB drives to start,
but the intention is to add more drives as storage requirements
increase.
Since you seem fine with
Mike Bird put forth on 4/26/2010 3:04 PM:
On Mon April 26 2010 12:29:43 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mark Allums put forth on 4/26/2010 12:51 PM:
Put four drives in a RAID 1, you can suffer a loss of three drives.
And you'll suffer pretty abysmal write performance as well.
Write performance of
Mark Allums put forth on 4/27/2010 10:31 PM:
For DIY, always pair those drives. Consider RAID 10, RAID 50, RAID 60,
etc. Alas, that doubles the number of drives, and intensely decreases
the MTBF, which is the whole outcome you want to avoid.
This is my preferred mdadm 4 drive setup for a
Stan,
We are on the same wavelength, I do the same thing myself. (Except that
I go ahead and mirror swap.) I love RAID 10.
MAA
On 4/28/2010 5:18 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mark Allums put forth on 4/27/2010 10:31 PM:
For DIY, always pair those drives. Consider RAID 10, RAID 50, RAID 60,
On Wed April 28 2010 01:44:37 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On a sufficiently fast system that is not loaded, the user will likely see
no performance degradation, especially given Linux' buffered I/O
architecture. However, on a loaded system, such as a transactional
database server or busy ftp upload
On 04/26/2010 04:33 PM, Mike Bird wrote:
On Mon April 26 2010 14:44:32 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
the chance of a double failure in a 5 (or less) drive array is minuscule.
A flaky controller knocking one drive out of an array and then
breaking another before you're rebuilt can really ruin
Mike Bird put forth on 4/28/2010 1:48 PM:
On Wed April 28 2010 01:44:37 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On a sufficiently fast system that is not loaded, the user will likely see
no performance degradation, especially given Linux' buffered I/O
architecture. However, on a loaded system, such as a
On Wed April 28 2010 15:10:32 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mike Bird put forth on 4/28/2010 1:48 PM:
I've designed commercial database managers and OLTP systems.
Are you saying you've put production OLTP databases on N-way software RAID
1 sets?
No. I've used N-way RAID-1 for general servers -
Mike Bird put forth on 4/28/2010 5:48 PM:
On Wed April 28 2010 15:10:32 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mike Bird put forth on 4/28/2010 1:48 PM:
I've designed commercial database managers and OLTP systems.
Are you saying you've put production OLTP databases on N-way software RAID
1 sets?
No. I've
On Wed April 28 2010 18:51:18 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
You seem to posses knowledge of these things that is 180 degrees opposite
of fact. OLTP, or online transaction processing, is typified by retail or
web point of sale transactions or call logging by telcos. OLTP databases
are typically much
Hi
I recently (last week), migrated from 10 x 1Tb to adaptec 51645 and 5
x 2T drives.
my experience, I can't get frub2 and the adaptec to work, so I am
booting from a SSD I had.
I carved up the 5x2T into 32G (mirror 1e - mirror stripe + parity) -
too boot from and mirrored against my ssd. the
On 4/26/2010 1:37 PM, Mike Bird wrote:
On Mon April 26 2010 10:51:38 Mark Allums wrote:
RAID 6 (and 5) perform well when less than approximately 1/3 full.
After that, even reads suffer.
Mark,
I've been using various kinds of RAID for many many years and
was not aware of that. Do you have a
On 4/26/2010 2:29 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mark Allums put forth on 4/26/2010 12:51 PM:
Put four drives in a RAID 1, you can suffer a loss of three drives.
And you'll suffer pretty abysmal write performance as well.
Also keep in mind that some software RAID implementations allow more than
On 4/26/2010 11:11 PM, Tim Clewlow wrote:
I don't know what your requirements / levels of paranoia are, but
RAID 5 is
probably better than RAID 6 until you are up to 6 or 7 drives; the
chance of a
double failure in a 5 (or less) drive array is minuscule.
.
I currently have 3 TB of data with
On 4/27/2010 9:56 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 4/26/2010 1:37 PM, Mike Bird wrote:
On Mon April 26 2010 10:51:38 Mark Allums wrote:
RAID 6 (and 5) perform well when less than approximately 1/3 full.
After that, even reads suffer.
Mark,
I've been using various kinds of RAID for many many years
Ok, I found the answer to my second question - it fails the entire
disk. So the first question remains.
Does ext3 (and relevent utilities, particularly resize2fs and
e2fsck) on 32 bit i386 arch support 16TB volumes?
Regards, Tim.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 4/26/2010 9:29 AM, Tim Clewlow wrote:
Hi there,
I'm getting ready to build a RAID 6 with 4 x 2TB drives to start,
but the intention is to add more drives as storage requirements
increase.
My research/googling suggests ext3 supports 16TB volumes if block
size is 4096 bytes, but some sites
On 4/26/2010 10:28 AM, Tim Clewlow wrote:
Ok, I found the answer to my second question - it fails the entire
disk. So the first question remains.
I just figured that out---and I see you have too.
The difference between what we would like it to do, and what it actually
does can be
I'm afraid that opinions of RAID vary widely on this list (no
surprise)
but you may be interested to note that we agree (a consensus) that
software-RAID 6 is an unfortunate choice.
.
Is this for performance reasons or potential data loss. I can live
with slow writes, reads should not be all
On 4/26/2010 11:57 AM, Tim Clewlow wrote:
I'm afraid that opinions of RAID vary widely on this list (no
surprise)
but you may be interested to note that we agree (a consensus) that
software-RAID 6 is an unfortunate choice.
.
Is this for performance reasons or potential data loss. I can live
On Mon April 26 2010 10:51:38 Mark Allums wrote:
RAID 6 (and 5) perform well when less than approximately 1/3 full.
After that, even reads suffer.
Mark,
I've been using various kinds of RAID for many many years and
was not aware of that. Do you have a link to an explanation?
Thanks,
--Mike
Mark Allums put forth on 4/26/2010 12:51 PM:
Put four drives in a RAID 1, you can suffer a loss of three drives.
And you'll suffer pretty abysmal write performance as well.
Also keep in mind that some software RAID implementations allow more than
two drives in RAID 1, most often called a
On Mon April 26 2010 12:29:43 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mark Allums put forth on 4/26/2010 12:51 PM:
Put four drives in a RAID 1, you can suffer a loss of three drives.
And you'll suffer pretty abysmal write performance as well.
Write performance of RAID-1 is approximately as good as a simple
On Monday 26 April 2010 09:29:28 Tim Clewlow wrote:
I'm getting ready to build a RAID 6 with 4 x 2TB drives to start,
but the intention is to add more drives as storage requirements
increase.
Since you seem fine with RAID 6, I'll assume you are also fine with RAID 5.
I don't know what your
On Mon April 26 2010 14:44:32 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
the chance of a double failure in a 5 (or less) drive array is minuscule.
A flaky controller knocking one drive out of an array and then
breaking another before you're rebuilt can really ruin your day.
Rebuild is generally the period
I don't know what your requirements / levels of paranoia are, but
RAID 5 is
probably better than RAID 6 until you are up to 6 or 7 drives; the
chance of a
double failure in a 5 (or less) drive array is minuscule.
.
I currently have 3 TB of data with another 1TB on its way fairly
soon, so 4
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:17:59 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
...
Be sure to avoid Nvidia graphics cards then. The best bet is probably to use
Intel graphics, *except* GMA500¹. Thanks to KMS², switching from X to a
virtual console and back is as fast as switching workspaces, and
On 13/12/09 21:37, Rogério Brito wrote:
Hi, All.
I would like to purchase a new system to replace my current Desktop.
Unfortunately, it seems that getting some new hardware is not as easy, due to a
multitude of unavailable drivers for Free Operating systems or differences
regarding the role of
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:37:14 -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
(...)
* And, finally, but very important, something that is fully supported by
Free Software only. I want to get a system where I can run Debian with
Linux as a kernel and, it would be fantastically nice if it could, work
acceptably
On 2009-12-13 22:37 +0100, Rogério Brito wrote:
I would like to purchase a new system to replace my current Desktop.
Unfortunately, it seems that getting some new hardware is not as easy, due to
a
multitude of unavailable drivers for Free Operating systems or differences
regarding the role
Bonjour,
Le mardi 24 novembre 2009, steve a écrit...
Voici /etc/dnsmaq.conf :
domain-needed
bogus-priv
interface=ath0
interface=ath1
interface=eth0
listen-address=127.0.0.1
no-dhcp-interface=eth1
expand-hosts
domain=maison.mrs
cache-size=550
(eth1 est l'interface qui donne
steve a écrit :
Bonjour,
Je suis en train d'essayer de configurer dnsmaq sur ma passerelle.
Voici /etc/dnsmaq.conf :
domain-needed
bogus-priv
interface=ath0
interface=ath1
interface=eth0
listen-address=127.0.0.1
no-dhcp-interface=eth1
expand-hosts
domain=maison.mrs
Le 24-11-2009, à 11:01:40 +0100, Frédéric Massot
(frede...@juliana-multimedia.com) a écrit :
steve a écrit :
Bonjour,
Je suis en train d'essayer de configurer dnsmaq sur ma passerelle.
Voici /etc/dnsmaq.conf :
domain-needed
bogus-priv
interface=ath0
interface=ath1
Mark Phillips wrote:
I am running Debian testing on my computer. I am in the process of doing an
apt-get update/apt-get dist-upgrade.
I got this error message :
info: Checking if it is safe to convert to dependency based boot.
error: Unable to migrate to dependency based boot sequencing.
Mark Phillips wrote:
I am running Debian testing on my computer. I am in the process of
doing an apt-get update/apt-get dist-upgrade.
I got this error message :
info: Checking if it is safe to convert to dependency based boot.
error: Unable to migrate to dependency based boot
On Sun, 24 May 2009 10:43:36 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI in
gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
Tony Baldwin wrote:
You would think, icedove being the brainchild of the debian movement,
that it would include this option for users on the debian lists.
Não faz sentido...
Even if Debian made a
On Thu,21.May.09, 14:43:03, Paul Scott wrote:
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed,20.May.09, 21:09:02, Muzer wrote:
Damn, I did it again, sending it to one person rather than everyone! I
really need to get used to this mailing list lark.
There's a reply-to-list extension for
On Thu,21.May.09, 13:46:19, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:19:24PM -0700, Ken Teague wrote:
Sthu Deus wrote:
Good day.
I have noticed that for some users in /etc/passwd the shell environment
is set as bash and for some as sh. This has led me to the following
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Thu,21.May.09, 14:43:03, Paul Scott wrote:
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed,20.May.09, 21:09:02, Muzer wrote:
Damn, I did it again, sending it to one person rather than everyone! I
really need to get used to this mailing list lark.
There's a reply-to-list
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 13:18 -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 01:53:08AM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
I have noticed that for some users in /etc/passwd the shell
environment is set as bash and for some as sh. This has led me to the
following questions:
. Why is it so,
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 14:37 +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 13:18 -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 01:53:08AM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
I have noticed that for some users in /etc/passwd the shell
environment is set as bash and for some as sh. This
On Sun,24.May.09, 08:04:09, Tony Baldwin wrote:
Well, one can always use some other client. Claws-mail is a very good
one if you don't like/want mutt.
Yeah, I've noted this behavior (using icedove).
Why don't replies go to the list?
Because you must use reply-to-list ;)
Are you saying
On Sun,24.May.09, 14:43:56, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
What a heck is that auto-reply thing (below)?
[snip]
Looks like a challenge-response to me. Quite bad, but on the other hand
you did Cc him ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert
Tony Baldwin wrote:
Yeah, I've noted this behavior (using icedove).
Why don't replies go to the list?
Are you saying that they will if I use mutt?
Not automatically. But mutt includes a command 'reply to list' (shift+L,
I think) that eases replying to the list. Icedove lacks such a
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Sun,24.May.09, 08:04:09, Tony Baldwin wrote:
Well, one can always use some other client. Claws-mail is a very good
one if you don't like/want mutt.
Yeah, I've noted this behavior (using icedove).
Why don't replies go to the list?
Because you must use reply-to-list
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Tony Baldwin wrote:
Yeah, I've noted this behavior (using icedove).
Why don't replies go to the list?
Are you saying that they will if I use mutt?
Not automatically. But mutt includes a command 'reply to list' (shift+L,
I think) that eases replying to the list.
Tony Baldwin wrote:
You would think, icedove being the brainchild of the debian movement,
that it would include this option for users on the debian lists.
Não faz sentido...
Even if Debian made a patch, it should be sent upstream to be added to
the main trunk. It's quite annoying that one
On Sun,24.May.09, 09:38:01, Tony Baldwin wrote:
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Sun,24.May.09, 08:04:09, Tony Baldwin wrote:
Well, one can always use some other client. Claws-mail is a very
good one if you don't like/want mutt.
Yeah, I've noted this behavior (using icedove).
Why don't replies go
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:19:24PM -0700, Ken Teague wrote:
Sthu Deus wrote:
Good day.
I have noticed that for some users in /etc/passwd the shell environment
is set as bash and for some as sh. This has led me to the following
questions:
. Why is it so, meaning what is the meaning of it?
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 01:53:08AM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
I have noticed that for some users in /etc/passwd the shell
environment is set as bash and for some as sh. This has led me to the
following questions:
. Why is it so, meaning what is the meaning of it?
System accounts and system
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed,20.May.09, 21:09:02, Muzer wrote:
Damn, I did it again, sending it to one person rather than everyone! I
really need to get used to this mailing list lark.
There's a reply-to-list extension for Thunderbird.
Not counting that the current version of
On Thu,21.May.09, 01:53:08, Sthu Deus wrote:
Good day.
I have noticed that for some users in /etc/passwd the shell environment
is set as bash and for some as sh. This has led me to the following
questions:
. Why is it so, meaning what is the meaning of it?
bash is better suited for
Sthu Deus wrote:
Good day.
I have noticed that for some users in /etc/passwd the shell environment
is set as bash and for some as sh. This has led me to the following
questions:
. Why is it so, meaning what is the meaning of it?
. Do I give more insecure environment to a user setting for him
On Wed,20.May.09, 21:09:02, Muzer wrote:
Damn, I did it again, sending it to one person rather than everyone! I
really need to get used to this mailing list lark.
There's a reply-to-list extension for Thunderbird.
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it
Sthu Deus wrote:
Good day.
I have noticed that for some users in /etc/passwd the shell environment
is set as bash and for some as sh. This has led me to the following
questions:
. Why is it so, meaning what is the meaning of it?
. Do I give more insecure environment to a user setting for him
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed,20.May.09, 21:09:02, Muzer wrote:
Damn, I did it again, sending it to one person rather than everyone! I
really need to get used to this mailing list lark.
There's a reply-to-list extension for Thunderbird.
Regards,
Andrei
Thanks, I'll look that
Ken Teague writes:
In Debian, absolutely nothing since it's a symbolic link to bash...
man bash and read the INVOCATION section.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:27:57 +0200, Angelin Lalev wrote:
[...]
Is it possible to use native PCL drivers for my printer and bypass the
long conversion - text and
images-PostscriptCUPSPostscript-PCL5/6 (and solve the
naming problem besides)?
CUPS has a special printer model called
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
If I have lots of existing data in JBODs, would I create a PV and VG on the
new drive, mv all the data from the existing drives to the new VG, then add
my existing drives (while also enlarging the fs) to the one-drive
On 01/23/2009 11:28 AM, Mike Castle wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
If I have lots of existing data in JBODs, would I create a PV and VG on the
new drive, mv all the data from the existing drives to the new VG, then add
my existing drives (while
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:24:45AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/21/2009 11:30 PM, Matthew Moore wrote:
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 09:13:07 pm Ron Johnson wrote:
That is exactly what I would do. Everyone warns about how cataclysmic
things will happen because your new uber-device has the
On 01/22/2009 11:20 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:24:45AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/21/2009 11:30 PM, Matthew Moore wrote:
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 09:13:07 pm Ron Johnson wrote:
That is exactly what I would do. Everyone warns about how cataclysmic
things
On 01/21/2009 11:30 PM, Matthew Moore wrote:
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 09:13:07 pm Ron Johnson wrote:
If I have lots of existing data in JBODs, would I create a PV and VG
on the new drive, mv all the data from the existing drives to the
new VG, then add my existing drives (while also
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 08:43:02 pm Ron Johnson wrote:
1. Since sdX device names are non-deterministic, can I use it with
devices specified as UUIDs? Or does lvm handle that for me on boot?
lvm stores volume identifiers in a header at the start of the physical
volumes, so the device
On 01/21/2009 09:59 PM, Matthew Moore wrote:
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 08:43:02 pm Ron Johnson wrote:
1. Since sdX device names are non-deterministic, can I use it with
devices specified as UUIDs? Or does lvm handle that for me on boot?
lvm stores volume identifiers in a header at the
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 09:13:07 pm Ron Johnson wrote:
If I have lots of existing data in JBODs, would I create a PV and VG
on the new drive, mv all the data from the existing drives to the
new VG, then add my existing drives (while also enlarging the fs) to
the one-drive VG, thus making
On 01/21/2009 11:30 PM, Matthew Moore wrote:
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 09:13:07 pm Ron Johnson wrote:
If I have lots of existing data in JBODs, would I create a PV and VG
on the new drive, mv all the data from the existing drives to the
new VG, then add my existing drives (while also
steve a écrit :
Merci d'avance à tous pour m'aider à convaincre définitivement mon pote
de l'avantage à passer sous GNU/Linux (il m'a fait peur hier, il veut
s'acheter un i-phone et il m'a dit que par conséquent (???) il voulait
s'acheter un mac, pour être compatible ...) aïe aie..)
Un Mac
On 26/04/2008, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the 'Partition settings' screen, toggle 'Erase data' from yes to no.
In practice I very much doubt that this would ever reduce your security.
It's been a while since I've looked at d-i, and maybe things have
changed, but is there an option to
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 09:00:52AM -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 26/04/2008, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the 'Partition settings' screen, toggle 'Erase data' from yes to no.
In practice I very much doubt that this would ever reduce your security.
It's been a while since
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 06:20:08PM +0200, Hans Martin wrote:
2. Because I'm experimenting with the installation, I would like
to skip one stop of the prepartion of the encryption, that
takes about two hours (does in write /dev/random to
/dev/hdaX?). How can I skip this step easily?
On 25/04/2008, Hans Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I like to have half of my disk crypted (with /, /usr/, /home,
all in one crypted partition), and the other half without
encryption e.g. as /usr/local).
[snip]
2. Because I'm experimenting with the installation, I would like
to
Jordi wrote:
On 25/04/2008, Hans Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I like to have half of my disk crypted (with /, /usr/, /home,
all in one crypted partition), and the other half without
encryption e.g. as /usr/local).
[snip]
...
Neither of those configuration options are yet
Quoth Ross Boylan:
Second, I also keep seeing stuff like this:
Jan 15 09:23:00 cotton kernel: wlan0: CTS protection disabled
(BSSID=00:45:4d:80:b6:24)
Jan 15 09:23:02 cotton kernel: wlan0: CTS protection enabled
(BSSID=00:45:4d:80:b6:24)
I think CTS protection is clear to send protection,
mpg a écrit :
En fait, fail2ban crée déjà une chaîne utilisateur. Par contre, dans mon
script init.d, il faudra que je fasse attention à la position relative de
mon script et de celui de fail2ban. Au pire je peux désactiver le script
fail2ban pour faire les choses tranquillement à ma manière.
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:14:20 +0100
mpg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Je suis en train d'écrire des règles de filtrage avec iptables pour mes
machines, et je me pose quelques questions.
http://www.linux-france.org/prj/inetdoc/guides/iptables-tutorial/
--
SGBDRO Open Source PostgreSQL,
Filtrage IP
Salut,
mpg (il est partout !) a écrit :
1. Quelle est sous Debian « la » bonne manière de charger ses règles
iptables automatiquement : script dans init.d, dans if-pre-up.d, ailleurs ?
En complément des autres réponses, il y a aussi /etc/ppp/ip-{up,down}.d/
pour les interfaces PPP créées
Salut,
Le (on) lundi 14 janvier 2008 13:51, Pascal Hambourg a écrit (wrote) :
mpg (il est partout !) a écrit :
(toi aussi !) (note que je ne m'en plains pas)
1. Quelle est sous Debian « la » bonne manière de charger ses règles
iptables automatiquement : script dans init.d, dans if-pre-up.d,
Bonjour,
Le mardi 15 janvier 2008, mpg a écrit...
Oki. J'ai d'ailleurs vu dans le securing-how-to qu'il y a d'autres
paramètres à régler en plus des tables netfilter, comme des 0 et des 1 à
mettre dans des fichiers sous /proc/sys/net/ipv4 (et sans doute ipv6).
C'est documenté où ce
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:14:20 +0100, mpg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonjour,
Bonsoir,
Je suis en train d'écrire des règles de filtrage avec iptables pour
mes
machines, et je me pose quelques questions.
1. Quelle est sous Debian « la » bonne manière de charger ses règles
iptables
mpg a écrit :
Bonjour,
Bonjour
1. Quelle est sous Debian « la » bonne manière de charger ses règles
iptables automatiquement : script dans init.d, dans if-pre-up.d, ailleurs ?
« bonne manière ™» je ne sais pas, mais l'une d'elle proposée dans le
manuel de sécurisation de Debian me convient
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:15:55PM +0100, Quentin Charrex
wrote:
Bonjour monsieur, je m'appelle Quentin et j'aimerai avoir
des réponses a mes questions s'y cela est possible. Alors
voila mes questions :
Mieux vaut mettre un sujet plus explicite que 'question' à
tes courriers. Si on poste
Bonjour,
Le samedi 05 janvier 2008, Quentin Charrex a écrit...
Bonjour monsieur, je m'appelle Quentin et j'aimerai avoir des réponses
a mes questions s'y cela est possible. Alors voila mes questions :
Vim l'éditeur, je l'ai installé correctement mais il n'y a pas les
numéros de
Bonjour,
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:15:55PM +0100, Quentin Charrex wrote:
Bonjour monsieur, je m'appelle Quentin et j'aimerai avoir des réponses a mes
questions s'y cela est possible.
Alors voila mes questions :
Vim l'éditeur, je l'ai installé correctement mais il n'y a pas les numéros
In trying to create some new web stuff, apache seems to be
complaining about shishi (which I see from research is the gnu
kerberos stuff). Why is it doing this? I know I could just create
the directory, but I want to understand WHAT it is trying to do and
WHY.
Port 12345 is one of my
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 14:20:27 +0100, Bob wrote:
Hi, I just tried Lenny and MergeFB is busted for that combination of
xserver-xorg-core and xserver-xorg-video-ati, for the moment the fix is
install xserver-xorg-video-ati from experimental, so I have to delve in the
world of apt-pinning.
301 - 400 of 820 matches
Mail list logo
