Re: Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-19 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 02:18:41PM -0700, Enrique Morfin wrote: > I tried it (kernel-image-2.6.8-11-em64t-p4-smp), and > worked, almost good. The only problem was that can't > use iptables. It gived me a message about the filter > table (or change the kernel). But the iptable_filter > module was al

Re: Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-13 Thread Enrique Morfin
>>But, are Xeons 64-bit processors?!? I didn't think >> >they were! >> >> http://www.intel.com/products/processor/xeon/index.htm >> >> i have 90nm. :) >> >> >There are stock kernel image for most architectures. >> >Depends on which >> >64-bit you've got (ia64 or amd64 or em64t). >> >> I'll tr

Re: Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-08 Thread Dave Ewart
On Friday, 08.07.2005 at 11:16 -0700, Enrique Morfin wrote: > >But, are Xeons 64-bit processors?!? I didn't think > >they were! > > http://www.intel.com/products/processor/xeon/index.htm > > i have 90nm. :) > > >There are stock kernel image for most architectures. > >Depends on which > >64-bi

RE: Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-08 Thread Enrique Morfin
>> i have a dual xeon box. It is running the >> kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686-smp. >> >> i guess that kernel is a 32 bit kernel. How can i >>proobe that? (less >> /proc/cpuinfo?) >uname -a will show you i686 (or i386) for a 32-bit x86 >kernel. A 64-bit >kernel would be x86_64 or something like that