Am 04. Sep, 2001 schwäzte John Galt so:
> Pretty often actually. Have multiple sources, be prepared to comment out
> the ones that don't work right now, and re-update and re-upgrade if the
> situation occurs again. Basically, http.us.debian.org is never the most
> trustworthy under the best of c
Pretty often actually. Have multiple sources, be prepared to comment out
the ones that don't work right now, and re-update and re-upgrade if the
situation occurs again. Basically, http.us.debian.org is never the most
trustworthy under the best of circumstances, and sometimes can be a real
bitch,
"Mike Kuhar" wrote:
>Good evening Fellow Debians,
>
>I went to do an apt-get upgrade, just a few moments ago, after doing an upda
>te
>on unstable. It told me I had 54 packages to upgrade. The problem is that
>only
>half actually downloaded and upgraded from http.us.debian.
@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: apt problems with http.us.debian.org?
"Mike Kuhar" wrote:
>Good evening Fellow Debians,
>
>I went to do an apt-get upgrade, just a few moments ago, after doing an upda
>te
>on unstable. It told me I had 54 packages to upgr
4 matches
Mail list logo
