On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 08:39:02PM -0400, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> begin Eric G. Miller quotation:
> >
> > And, in the context of using "ln", your point is?
>
> That question is unanswerable, because it contains a faulty assumption.
And the faulty assumption is? The OP was asking about linking t
begin Eric G. Miller quotation:
>
> And, in the context of using "ln", your point is?
That question is unanswerable, because it contains a faulty assumption.
--
Shawn McMahon| McMahon's Laws of Linux support:
http://www.eiv.com | 1) There's more than one way
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 10:42:06AM -0400, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> begin Eric G. Miller quotation:
> >
> > Some might argue that hard links are a bad thing and should be
> > avoided.
>
> Others might point out that there is at least one hard link to EVERY
> file that appears in a directory listing
begin Eric G. Miller quotation:
>
> Some might argue that hard links are a bad thing and should be
> avoided.
Others might point out that there is at least one hard link to EVERY
file that appears in a directory listing.
--
Shawn McMahon| McMahon's Laws of Linux support:
h
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:32:15PM -0700, faisal gillani wrote:
>
> what is the diffrence between a symbolic & a hard link ?
A symbolic link is basically a pointer to the real file. If you
remove the real file, the symbolic link is broken. A hard link
is essentially the same as a "real" file
faisal gillani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what is the diffrence between a symbolic & a hard link ?
A symbolic link is a directory entry that points to the name of
another file. For example:
dmaze% echo hello > foo
dmaze% ln -s foo bar
dmaze% ls -l bar
lrwxrwxrwx1 dmazedmaze
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:32:15PM -0700, faisal gillani wrote:
|
| what is the diffrence between a symbolic & a hard link ?
One (symlink) is a pointer to the filename. It can point to
directories and can cross filesystem boundaries.
The other (hard link) is a second name that refers to the s
what is the diffrence between a symbolic & a hard link ?
thanks for the reply
Dayalan Manohar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,try man ln to read the help.the command isln -s /other/directory /home/faisal/linknameln -s is to create a symbolic link.without s option hard link is created.hth,day
ln -s the_existing_path your_alias_for_it
--
Sincerely,
David Smead
http://www.amplepower.com.
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, faisal gillani wrote:
>
> i want to create a link of another directory in my home directory .. as i
> dont want to type huge command to reach there ..
>
> i do know how to creat
Is this a kind of promotional email for something so obvious?
Looking at the way this email got posted to debian group in BCC
and Sun group, I get my own doubts. Who knows how many more lists
were copied in Bcc?
> i want to create a link of another directory in my home directory ..
> as i dont wa
ln -sf /home/user /etc/imduser
much better do `man ln` it always work :)
louie
> i want to create a link of another directory in my home directory ..
> as i dont want to type huge command to reach there ..
>
> i do know how to create from gui mode .. but i wana create it in the
> command mo
faisal gillani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. (*) text/plain ( ) text/html
(Unnecessary, and irritating on public mailing lists; please configure
your mailer to send plain text only.)
> i want to create a link of another directory in my home directory
> .. as i dont want to
12 matches
Mail list logo