Hellohow do you "upgrade" from 2.2.16 to 2.2.2?! I would really like to
know...
Patrick Cheong
Information Systems Assurance
Measat Broadcast Network Systems
e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit us at: http://www.astro.com.my
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale L . Morris [SMTP:[EMAIL
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since
> this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there
> any significant improvements over 2.2.16?
As many others have indicated, you're thinking of th
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Dale L . Morris wrote:
> Ok, I want to install kernel 2.2.17. I have done that with 2.2.16 and
> I understand that part. I'm confused about the debian way to do
> it. Before I just downloaded 2.2.16 from www.kernel.org, untarred it
> to /usr/src and compiled it. But, going to w
2.2.17 is not released yet, but you can get a "pre release" patch
ftp.kernel.org
/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan
i believe is the directory, in there is a directory called something
like 2.2.17pre and inside there are the patches, im running 2.2.17pre18
on 2 machines and it runs well sofar. at leas
Ok, I want to install kernel 2.2.17. I have done that with 2.2.16 and
I understand that part. I'm confused about the debian way to do
it. Before I just downloaded 2.2.16 from www.kernel.org, untarred it
to /usr/src and compiled it. But, going to www.kernel.org now, there
is no 2.2.17 kernel to down
Ok, I understand now, guess I was thinking in decimals and
overcomplicating it. Thanks for your replys
> I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since
> this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there
> any significant improvements over 2.2.16?
> thanks
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:01:12PM -0700, Dale L . Morris wrote:
> That's what I'm confused about, I am thinking, perhaps in error that
> 2.2.2 is a later version than 2.2.16. Is that wrong?
Yes, 2 is smaller than 16. It's not ".20" versus ".16".
Regards
Sven
--
Windows does *not* have bugs. It
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Dale L . Morris wrote:
> I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since
> this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there
> any significant improvements over 2.2.16?
> thanks
> -- dale
>
>
> "Know thyself.."
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe
2.2.16 is still the newest released "Stable" kernel
2.2.2 is more then a year old!
nate
"Dale L . Morris" wrote:
>
> I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since
> this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there
> any significant improvements over 2.2
Hi Dan,
That's what I'm confused about, I am thinking, perhaps in error that
2.2.2 is a later version than 2.2.16. Is that wrong?
Daniel E. Baumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Dale L . Morris wrote:
> > I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since
> > th
10 matches
Mail list logo
