Re: modversions.h? Don't have it. Any solution?

2004-09-24 Thread Wayne Topa
Eric Dickner([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > Apparently I am not the first person to run into a > problem regarding this particular header. A general > web search revealed that all sorts of people have > tried to compile drivers, found they needed but didn't > have this thing, and t

Re: modversions.h

2001-05-29 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: modversions.h Date: Tue, May 29, 2001 at 07:28:56PM +0200 In reply to:Robert Voigt Quoting Robert Voigt([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Tuesday 29 May 2001 18:43, ktb wrote: > > A search at - > > http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages > > shows that mo

Re: modversions.h

2001-05-29 Thread Robert Voigt
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 18:43, ktb wrote: > A search at - > http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages > shows that modversions.h is in the kernel-headers package. Do you have > that installed? I don't know for sure that will get you were your > going. Of course I have the kernel-source package insta

Re: modversions.h

2001-05-29 Thread ktb
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 06:35:54PM +0200, Robert Voigt wrote: > I thought if I compile the kernel with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y it puts > modversions.h in /usr/include/linux, but it didn't. Why? > > I want to compile a kernel module that looks for modversions.h. > > Sorry if this was answered before

Re: modversions.h

2001-04-13 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 04:30:25PM +1000, Tomaas Ortega wrote: > worked fine for me *shrug* > nothing seems broken on this end > network cards installed fine as did video cards and other stuff > maybe youve had a bad experience symlinking /usr/include/linux to /usr/src/linux (or blindly replacing

Re: modversions.h

2001-04-13 Thread Tomaas Ortega
worked fine for me *shrug* nothing seems broken on this end network cards installed fine as did video cards and other stuff maybe youve had a bad experience On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:03:08AM +1000, Tomaas Ortega wrote: > > Install the kernel-headers pac

Re: modversions.h

2001-04-12 Thread Sebastiaan
Hi, h, creative possble solutions have been given on this list. I found out that modversions.h is not zipped in the archive but generated when building a kernel: the new package needs to know which symbols to load? I think this is enough: cd /usr/src/linux cp /boot/config- hi all, > > i down

Re: modversions.h

2001-04-12 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:03:08AM +1000, Tomaas Ortega wrote: > Install the kernel-headers package for whatever kernwel you have... > then symlink /usr/inlude/linux to > /usr/src/kernel-headers-2.x.x/include/linux DO NOT do that, you will BREAK your system. /usr/include/linux is provided by libc

Re: modversions.h

2001-04-12 Thread Tomaas Ortega
Install the kernel-headers package for whatever kernwel you have... then symlink /usr/inlude/linux to /usr/src/kernel-headers-2.x.x/include/linux then try and install the new driver. i think thats the way its done its been a while since ive done it tom On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Tiarnan O'Corrain wrote:

Re: modversions.h

2001-04-12 Thread Tiarnan O'Corrain
As far as I know, this was already dealt with... try searching the archives. On shaky ground, I believe that modversions.h is created during kernel compilation, and is remove by 'make mrproper' Cheers Tiarnan --- Oliver Drechsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all, > > i downloaded from www.i

Re: modversions.h

2001-04-12 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:33:00PM +0100, Oliver Drechsler wrote: > hi all, > > i downloaded from www.intel.com a agp-card driver and i > tryed to install but the makefile returns this error : > > agpgart.c:52: linux/modversions.h: No such file or directory modify it to include /usr/src/kernel-h

Re: modversions.h ?

2000-01-20 Thread Gary Hennigan
Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 20-Jan-2000 aphro wrote: > > if the program you are compiling requires 2.2.x i suggest re linking > > /usr/include/linux to /usr/src/linux/include/linux (i think thats > > right) .. rename /usr/include/linux > > That is the action I was considering, but I

Re: modversions.h ?

2000-01-20 Thread Pollywog
On 20-Jan-2000 aphro wrote: > if the program you are compiling requires 2.2.x i suggest re linking > /usr/include/linux to /usr/src/linux/include/linux (i think thats > right) .. rename /usr/include/linux That is the action I was considering, but I did not think it should be done with 2.2.x kerne

Re: modversions.h ?

2000-01-20 Thread aphro
if the program you are compiling requires 2.2.x i suggest re linking /usr/include/linux to /usr/src/linux/include/linux (i think thats right) .. rename /usr/include/linux the program is probably looking for something 2.1/2.2/2.3 specific and debian's default headers in /usr/include dont cut it for

RE: modversions.h ?

2000-01-20 Thread Pollywog
On 20-Jan-2000 Pollywog wrote: > What is the story behind modversions.h ? > > I am using kernel 2.2.14 and I don't have this file, but I see it is listed > for kernel-headers package 2.2.13. I built a custom kernel and I am not > using > the default Debian kernel image. oops it does appear that

Re: modversions.h missing

1999-09-16 Thread Seth R Arnold
Some apps can also compile without modversions.h -- try removing the -DMODVERSIONS in the Makefile for the program, and try compiling again. On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 01:01:37AM -, Pollywog wrote: > I was trying to compile an app and I got this error about modversions.h > What do I have to do to

RE: modversions.h missing

1999-09-16 Thread Pollywog
On 16-Sep-99 Pollywog wrote: > I was trying to compile an app and I got this error about modversions.h > What do I have to do to get modversions.h ? I thought I had to answer > "Y" > to the question about setting module versions when I compiled my kernel > (2.2.12) and I did that. > I seem to r