Re: startup/connection trubble [was Modules & name resolution]

2000-04-27 Thread w trillich
hey john -- thanks for the informative reply! John Pearson wrote: > > > my syslog was complaining of something quite similar, so maybe > > you already helped my problem a bit. from syslog... > > Apr 25 21:29:48 server modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more > > recent than /lib/modules/2.0.36/m

Re: startup/connection trubble [was Modules & name resolution]

2000-04-28 Thread John Pearson
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 10:50:09PM -0500, w trillich wrote > hey john -- thanks for the informative reply! > > John Pearson wrote: > > > > > my syslog was complaining of something quite similar, so maybe > > > you already helped my problem a bit. from syslog... > > > Apr 25 21:29:48 server modpro

Re: startup/connection trubble [was Modules & name resolution]

2000-04-28 Thread w trillich
John Pearson wrote: > > > The "net-pf-18" message is the kernel trying to load the module > > > for network protocol family 18, which linux/include/net/socket.h > > > lists as "Ash", with which I'm not familiar. If it represents a > > > protocol family that you don't intend to support, or you just

Re: startup/connection trubble [was Modules & name resolution]

2000-04-28 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 08:59:34AM -0500, w trillich wrote: > > nfs = network fileshare system (or similar)? as in, a windows user > can see a volume icon on their desktop from the linux box? don't > need that... (the appletalk stuff is still operational... does > it need NFS?) no, NFS == Network

RE: startup/connection trubble [was Modules & name resolution]

2000-04-28 Thread Dominic Blythe
> Cc: John Pearson; debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: startup/connection trubble [was Modules & name > resolution] > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 08:59:34AM -0500, w trillich wrote: > > > > nfs = network fileshare system (or similar)? as in, a windows

RE: startup/connection trubble [was Modules & name resolution]

2000-04-28 Thread Corey Popelier
ps just gives me the obvious processes. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ethan Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 28 April 2000 15:45 > > To: w trillich > > Cc: John Pearson; debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Subject: Re: startup/connection tr

Re: startup/connection trubble [was Modules & name resolution]

2000-04-28 Thread Eugene Teo
> i'm getting into this debate. > what's the switches for ps that'll show all the daemons i'm running? > just ps just gives me the obvious processes. ps aux | more for linux or bsd, etc or ps -fu for SunOS > > no, NFS == Network File System (more accuratly known as No File > > Security ;-) it