Re: Tekram dc-390u2w and kernel 2.6.0

2004-02-05 Thread Andrew Schulman
my scsi card (Tekram dc-390u2w) was working fine using the sym53c8xx driver built into the kernel. I don't know about the sym53c8xx driver. I have a Tekram DC395UW, and I use the dc395x driver. It works fine. It's just been integrated into the kernel source for the first time since 2.6.0.

RE: Tekram dc-390u2w and kernel 2.6.0

2004-02-05 Thread Brad Cramer
:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tekram dc-390u2w and kernel 2.6.0 my scsi card (Tekram dc-390u2w) was working fine using the sym53c8xx driver built into the kernel. I don't know about the sym53c8xx driver. I have a Tekram DC395UW, and I use the dc395x driver. It works fine. It's

RE: tekram dc-390u2w

2000-07-17 Thread Wagener, Michael
Cc: debian_user_list Subject: Re: tekram dc-390u2w No idea if their driver has anything over the stock kernel driver. Only thing I notice with my u2w was the lack of activity light after kernel boot. Of course my new case doesn't even have a second HDD light. :/ On Sun, 16 Jul 2000

Re: tekram dc-390u2w

2000-07-17 Thread tjm
Thanks for the reply. Out of curiosity, what are you considering as newer kernels. I was able to compile the tekram dc390x_ncr driver for the dc390u2w both in a 2.2.16 kernel and as a module in that kernel with no errors, but I haven't tried to run them yet. This still leaves the original