On Thu, 19 Dec 1996, Carl Greco wrote:
I have set up a couple of Linux based e-mail servers with uucp. The
main advantages of uucp are low cost and local control of e-mail
accounts.
Exactly the reason why I like it.
The latest system (a 386SX-16MHz 4MB PC) uses Debian 1.1
with smail and
On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, Al Youngwerth wrote:
I'd sure like to hear from other ISPs and linux masquerading/diald
users out there and how they handle virtual domains. Using linux with
masquerading and diald is becoming a very popular way to connect small
LANs to businesses so I think its
According to Nick Busigin:
On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, Al Youngwerth wrote:
I'd sure like to hear from other ISPs and linux masquerading/diald
users out there and how they handle virtual domains. Using linux with
masquerading and diald is becoming a very popular way to connect small
LANs to
]
--
From: Nick Busigin[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 1996 4:44 PM
To: 'debian-user'
Cc: Al Youngwerth
Subject:RE: virtual mail domains... long-winded response
On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, Al Youngwerth wrote:
I'd sure like to hear from other ISPs and linux
[ snip ]
We do virtual domains with POP3 here by using a custom local mailer
and a modified version of qpopper.
The first step is to create a virtual_pop transport, then a virtual_pop
director, e.g.
This seems crazy to me. Originally, this was that approach I was going to
take. However,
5 matches
Mail list logo