The network mask assigned to eth0, as reported [255.255.252.0] by ifconfig,
seems to be incorrect. Never heard about classless subnets in Class B
networks. You probably have a Class C (/24) network [255.255.255.0] or a
classless subnet of a Class C network, like [255.255.255.252].
--- Alencar
Quoting Luiz Carlos S. de Alencar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
The network mask assigned to eth0, as reported [255.255.252.0] by ifconfig,
seems to be incorrect. Never heard about classless subnets in Class B
networks. You probably have a Class C (/24) network [255.255.255.0] or a
classless subnet of
Always learning. Thanks, David.
-Mensagem original-
De: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: Quinta-feira, 15 de Fevereiro de 2001 11:55
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Assunto: Re: RES: networking partly broken after upgrade
I don't know what all this is about. Still, it woke me up.
I was just reading this in one of the TCP/IP books I have, so I'll take a stab
at explaining it (and let somebody else explain the
errors).
IP addresses are divided into host portions and network portions. The host
portion is assigned
4 matches
Mail list logo