On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:42:58PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:28:52AM -0800, Hereon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
3) The Debian community would be much better served
a) by the creation now of two new mailing lists, called:
1) debian-user-woody, or possibly
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:28:52AM -0800, Hereon wrote:
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating debian-user.
It's come up before, and it still sounds like a thoroughly dreadful
idea,
on Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:28:52AM -0800, Hereon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating debian-user.
Summary:
1) The Debian user community is
On Monday 01 December 2003 11:28, Hereon wrote:
1) The Debian user community is substantially suboptimally served
with the existence of the current debian-user list.
As some debian users post to debian-user without being subscribed, they
request to be cc'ed by the helpers. As said users may
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:09:41PM +, Siraj 'Sid' Rakhada wrote:
I think maybe a single new list should be created -
debian-user-unstable, or maybe just debian-unstable, for... well
unstable people ;)
Well, debian-devel is the unstable
Attention: Please Cc me if you answer from debian-user (curently I am
== not subscribed, because the traffic and an ADSL Problem)
Am 2003-12-01 10:40:40, schrieb Tim Folger:
This is a very good idea. It might be easiest if the lists were named
debian-stable, debian-testing, and
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Attention: Please Cc me if you answer from debian-user (curently I am
== not subscribed, because the traffic and an ADSL Problem)
Am 2003-12-01 10:40:40, schrieb Tim Folger:
This is a very good idea. It might be easiest if the lists were named
debian-stable,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:02:50PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Which mean, that even if someone like to install SLINK on a
486, the Mailinglist will still availlable. For peoples
which are willing to Help it will no problenm, because the
traffic are naturaly decreasing on older
Am 2003-12-02 11:20:24, schrieb Michael Perry:
I think that this is a good idea overall. Since I also track a bit of
freebsd stuff, I always liked their approach to having email lists for
I am on FreeBSD and NetBSD Lists... ;-)
Perhaps there should be a discussion whether a debian-questions
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating debian-user.
Summary:
1) The Debian user community is substantially suboptimally served
with the existence of the current debian-user list.
2)
Hi there,
--On Monday, December 1, 2003 2:28 -0800 Hereon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
3) The Debian community would be much better served
a) by the creation now of two new mailing lists, called:
1) debian-user-woody, or possibly debian-user-stable,
or possibly debian-user-3
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:28:52 -0800
Hereon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating debian-user.
I can see what motivates the proposal, and I can see that
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:28:52 -0800
Hereon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating debian-user.
And the people running mixed systems?
I'm running stable and
I disagree with this request. See below for my reasons.
Hereon wrote:
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating debian-user.
Summary:
1) The Debian user community is substantially
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:28:52 -0800,
Hereon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating debian-user.
Summary:
1) The Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:28:52AM -0800, Hereon wrote:
1) The Debian user community is substantially suboptimally served
with the existence of the current debian-user list.
Howso? If you're going to make those claims, back it up.
2) The
On Monday 01 December 2003 04:28, Hereon wrote:
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating debian-user.
I say leave well enough alone. I like being able to get all my answers in one
Hereon wrote:
Debian stable releases have been approximately 1-2 years apart. During
this period of time, many Debian users make active use of the
testing/unstable system.
Currently, user questions about testing/unstable are likely to be asked
in the debian-user list.
But, that is definitely not
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:35:02AM -0600, Stewart Jenkins wrote:
On Monday 01 December 2003 04:28, Hereon wrote:
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating debian-user.
I say
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:28:52 -0800, Hereon wrote:
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating debian-user.
Summary:
1) The Debian user community is substantially suboptimally served
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:52:23PM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:28:52 -0800 Hereon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating
21 matches
Mail list logo
