Hi *,
Just wanted to ask if anybody is still using the libsvga support of the
Debian GS packages. I really would like to get rid of that ugly hack
and if nobody speaks up one of the next uploads will have svga support
removed.
Comments?
Torsten (Ghostscript Maintainer)
pgps9E8Mcsw3B.p
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:47:16AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> Just wanted to ask if anybody is still using the libsvga support of the
> Debian GS packages. I really would like to get rid of that ugly hack
> and if nobody speaks up one of the next uploads will have svga support
>
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:35:14PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> I think it'd be really nice if you could get framebuffer support, since
> svga doesn't even relate to most of my systems anyway :)
Right, that would be a nice replacement to svga support. I am looking
into it.
Thanks
Torste
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:47:16AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> Just wanted to ask if anybody is still using the libsvga support of the
> Debian GS packages. I really would like to get rid of that ugly hack
> and if nobody speaks up one of the next uploads will have svga supp
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:07:16PM +0200, Dr. Guenter Bechly wrote:
> Yes there are people still using libsvga support and there even are
> packages that depend on it like bmv (a postscript viewer for console
> that is maintained by me and that is still actively developed).
> Therefore, please do n
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 08:38:21PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > Yes there are people still using libsvga support and there even are
> > packages that depend on it like bmv (a postscript viewer for console
> > that is maintained by me and that is still actively developed).
> > Therefore, please d
6 matches
Mail list logo
