On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 16:39, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:09, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 04:18, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 02:15, Lee W wrote:
> > > > > It is also more
> > > > > "space appropriate" to do this headless than to go with a separ
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:09, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 04:18, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 02:15, Lee W wrote:
> > > > It is also more
> > > > "space appropriate" to do this headless than to go with a separate
> > > > traditional box/monitor/keyboard, so long as I
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:46:14PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 14:48, Carel Fellinger wrote:
...
> > Here me English is lacking, atleast I can't parse the above.
...
> Yeah, I did say something weird there :)
>
...sniped the explanation
Okee, I see. In my experience most
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 04:18, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 02:15, Lee W wrote:
> > > It is also more
> > > "space appropriate" to do this headless than to go with a separate
> > > traditional box/monitor/keyboard, so long as I'm not walking into more
> > > headaches than I can guess at
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 02:15, Lee W wrote:
> > It is also more
> > "space appropriate" to do this headless than to go with a separate
> > traditional box/monitor/keyboard, so long as I'm not walking into more
> > headaches than I can guess at at present.
> >
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Given that you are put
> It is also more
> "space appropriate" to do this headless than to go with a separate
> traditional box/monitor/keyboard, so long as I'm not walking into more
> headaches than I can guess at at present.
>
Hi Mark,
Given that you are putting all this in a rack, Have you considered using a
KVM sw
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:18:58AM -0800, nate wrote:
>> I haven't tried GRUB, but with LILO the serial options doesn't let me
>> interact with lilo, it just spits the information out to the serial port.
>
>This I find har
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 14:48, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:59:15PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> ..
> > The current desktop box would become a combination firewall and X
> > terminal, but it all raises one key question: with the second rack
> > computer being meant to be reboo
Carel Fellinger said:
>
> This I find hard to believe, did you try to send a break? According to
> the lilo docs one needs to send a break instead of pressing shift to get
> lilo's attention.
no, haven't tried that:)
thanks
nate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:18:58AM -0800, nate wrote:
> Mark L. Kahnt said:
>
>
> > a separate machine? I know that Lilo and Grub do have the "serial" option
> > for sending the info to another machine (I'm hoping that means that
> > Minicom would handle it fine.) Any heads-up of use, given that
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:59:15PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
..
> The current desktop box would become a combination firewall and X
> terminal, but it all raises one key question: with the second rack
> computer being meant to be rebooted regularly as I switch between
> various o/s, how reliable
Mark L. Kahnt said:
> a separate machine? I know that Lilo and Grub do have the "serial" option
> for sending the info to another machine (I'm hoping that means that
> Minicom would handle it fine.) Any heads-up of use, given that it is one
I haven't tried GRUB, but with LILO the serial options
I'm looking at putting a couple rack mounted systems in as a
reorganisation of my computing environment - one an SMP IA32 type system
(we'll see how many CPUs make sense) running as a file and computing
server with Debian GNU/Linux, and the other likely only one CPU at
present to run as an experime
13 matches
Mail list logo
