Michelle Konzack wrote:
> ACK! - Same experience here.
> It is definitivly Mozilla, which sucks.
I dunno. Most of those runs also had 2 programs running the entire time.
Thunderbird and Firefox. I know Firefox isn't Mozilla per se but still,
close cousins and all that.
--
Steve C
Hi Steve,
Am 2005-11-15 00:02:14, schrieb Steve Lamb:
> Counter anecdotal evidence...
>
> 173 days, 19:00:02 | Linux 2.6.9-1-686Sun Mar 27 18:56:01 2005
> 246 days, 19:43:30 | Linux 2.6.9-1-686Tue Feb 1 00:16:37 2005
> 331 days, 22:05:18 | Linux 2.6.9-1-686
Am 2005-11-13 18:39:23, schrieb Carl Johnson:
> I have similar problems, and I know it isn't used by the buffers and
> cache as others have already suggested. I have to exit from
> X-windows, so it appears that X has some major memory leaks. My
> system seems to lose about 50MB/day, so that mean
Carl Johnson wrote:
> I have similar problems, and I know it isn't used by the buffers and
> cache as others have already suggested. I have to exit from
> X-windows, so it appears that X has some major memory leaks.
Counter anecdotal evidence...
173 days, 19:00:02 | Linux 2.6.9-1-686
Joseph Haig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- Carl Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > gustavo halperin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I commonly use the next applications: Mozilla, gnu-emacs, gv, xpdf
> > > and many xterminals. The problem is that after many day
Andrew Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Carl Johnson wrote:
>
> > [snip]
> > I have similar problems, and I know it isn't used by the buffers and
> > cache as others have already suggested.
>
> How, pray tell, do you know this?
The 'free' command shows how much is used
--- Carl Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gustavo halperin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > I commonly use the next applications: Mozilla, gnu-emacs, gv, xpdf
> > and many xterminals. The problem is that after many days without
> > restart the system the memory grow a little
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Carl Johnson wrote:
> [snip]
> I have similar problems, and I know it isn't used by the buffers and
> cache as others have already suggested.
How, pray tell, do you know this?
ap
--
Andrew J Perrin - http:/
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 18:34 +0200, gustavo halperin wrote:
> Hello
>
> I commonly use the next applications: Mozilla, gnu-emacs, gv, xpdf and
> many xterminals.
> The problem is that after many days without restart the system the
> memory grow a little more any day
> and after aprox. 20 days I
--- gustavo halperin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I commonly use the next applications: Mozilla,
> gnu-emacs, gv, xpdf and
> many xterminals.
> The problem is that after many days without restart
> the system the
> memory grow a little more any day
> and after aprox. 20 days I have
gustavo halperin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello
>
> I commonly use the next applications: Mozilla, gnu-emacs, gv, xpdf
> and many xterminals. The problem is that after many days without
> restart the system the memory grow a little more any day and after
> aprox. 20 days I have all my 775M
gustavo halperin wrote:
Hello
I commonly use the next applications: Mozilla, gnu-emacs, gv, xpdf and
many xterminals.
The problem is that after many days without restart the system the
memory grow a little more any day
and after aprox. 20 days I have all my 775MB occupied by the system and
e
Hi,
I think that's nothing wrong. It's just the way Linux manages memory.
Linux uses available memory as cache so if you need that information again you can
get it faster. That memory is still available to other programs as needed.
Ticciano
Hello
I commonly use the next applications: M
Hello
I commonly use the next applications: Mozilla, gnu-emacs, gv, xpdf and
many xterminals.
The problem is that after many days without restart the system the
memory grow a little more any day
and after aprox. 20 days I have all my 775MB occupied by the system and
even if I close all
the ap
14 matches
Mail list logo
