Re: 32 or 64 bit on DELL INSPIRON celeron

2008-04-05 Thread Michael Geiger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | Damon L. Chesser wrote: | | Wrong list, should have been sent to the dell linux user list. Sorry. |> Boris Epstein wrote: |>> 64-bit Java for Linux is not quit ethere yet, so if you intend to use |>> the machien as a workstation - which most likely

Re: 32 or 64 bit on DELL INSPIRON celeron

2008-04-05 Thread Damon L. Chesser
Damon L. Chesser wrote: Wrong list, should have been sent to the dell linux user list. Sorry. Boris Epstein wrote: 64-bit Java for Linux is not quit ethere yet, so if you intend to use the machien as a workstation - which most likely you do - running 32-bit Linux probably makes more sense at

Re: 32 or 64 bit on DELL INSPIRON celeron

2008-04-05 Thread Damon L. Chesser
Boris Epstein wrote: 64-bit Java for Linux is not quit ethere yet, so if you intend to use the machien as a workstation - which most likely you do - running 32-bit Linux probably makes more sense at the moment. SNIP Boris, I do not know about 64-bit Java for Linux being not quite there. I

Re: Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-19 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 02:18:41PM -0700, Enrique Morfin wrote: > I tried it (kernel-image-2.6.8-11-em64t-p4-smp), and > worked, almost good. The only problem was that can't > use iptables. It gived me a message about the filter > table (or change the kernel). But the iptable_filter > module was al

Re: Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-13 Thread Enrique Morfin
>>But, are Xeons 64-bit processors?!? I didn't think >> >they were! >> >> http://www.intel.com/products/processor/xeon/index.htm >> >> i have 90nm. :) >> >> >There are stock kernel image for most architectures. >> >Depends on which >> >64-bit you've got (ia64 or amd64 or em64t). >> >> I'll tr

Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-08 Thread Ron Johnson
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 19:19 +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > Enrique Morfin wrote: > > Hi all! > > Hi, > > > how can i get a 64 bit kernel? do i have to compile > > myself? or there are some kernel images ready to use? > > As far as I know, 64bits is a separate architecture now. > If you

Re: Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-08 Thread Dave Ewart
On Friday, 08.07.2005 at 11:16 -0700, Enrique Morfin wrote: > >But, are Xeons 64-bit processors?!? I didn't think > >they were! > > http://www.intel.com/products/processor/xeon/index.htm > > i have 90nm. :) > > >There are stock kernel image for most architectures. > >Depends on which > >64-bi

Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-08 Thread Clive Menzies
On (08/07/05 10:49), Enrique Morfin wrote: > >> Hi all! > > >Hi, > > >> how can i get a 64 bit kernel? do i have to compile > >> myself? or there are some kernel images ready to > use? > > >As far as I know, 64bits is a separate architecture > >now. > >If you want it you'll probably have to "swi

RE: Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-08 Thread Enrique Morfin
>> i have a dual xeon box. It is running the >> kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686-smp. >> >> i guess that kernel is a 32 bit kernel. How can i >>proobe that? (less >> /proc/cpuinfo?) >uname -a will show you i686 (or i386) for a 32-bit x86 >kernel. A 64-bit >kernel would be x86_64 or something like that

Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-08 Thread Enrique Morfin
>> Hi all! >Hi, >> how can i get a 64 bit kernel? do i have to compile >> myself? or there are some kernel images ready to use? >As far as I know, 64bits is a separate architecture >now. >If you want it you'll probably have to "switch" many >binaries. Are not 32 bit emulation? If not, how i ch

Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-08 Thread Dave Ewart
On Friday, 08.07.2005 at 07:59 -0700, Enrique Morfin wrote: > i have a dual xeon box. It is running the > kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686-smp. > > i guess that kernel is a 32 bit kernel. How can i proobe that? (less > /proc/cpuinfo?) uname -a will show you i686 (or i386) for a 32-bit x86 kernel. A 64

Re: 32 or 64

2005-07-08 Thread Rakotomandimby Mihamina
Enrique Morfin wrote: > Hi all! Hi, > how can i get a 64 bit kernel? do i have to compile > myself? or there are some kernel images ready to use? As far as I know, 64bits is a separate architecture now. If you want it you'll probably have to "switch" many binaries. Well i'm not certain, but I t