Re: Adding a superuser

2001-01-10 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 03:05:12PM -0500, Arcady Genkin wrote: IIRC, bash is almost always dynamically linked, while sh is statically linked. Guess again: kuno ~$ ls -l /bin/sh lrwxrwxrwx1 root root4 May 25 2000 /bin/sh - bash kuno ~$ It's a good measure to have a

Re: Adding a superuser

2000-01-10 Thread 2
Why on Earth would u want to??? unless u have a really, really good reason to, don't bother and just have the one superuser. the more superusers u have the more of a security risk you create since it makes available more priveleged accounts for malicious users to hack and do whatever they please

Re: Adding a superuser

2000-01-10 Thread Arcady Genkin
Robert Marlow (2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why on Earth would u want to??? Well, I have two superuser accounts on my system: root with default shell bash, and toor with default shell sh. This is very common usage on BSD systems -- if bash becomes corrupted or inaccessible, you can login with

Re: Adding a superuser

2000-01-10 Thread John Hasler
Arcady Genkin writes: Well, I have two superuser accounts on my system: root with default shell bash, and toor with default shell sh. ... IIRC, bash is almost always dynamically linked, while sh is statically linked. lrwxrwxrwx1 root root4 Nov 6 19:39 /bin/sh - bash

Re: Adding a superuser

2000-01-10 Thread Arcady Genkin
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: lrwxrwxrwx1 root root4 Nov 6 19:39 /bin/sh - bash Geez! Thanks for pointing this out, I had no idea. I wonder what would be the rationale for not including a standard sh in a distro... 8-/ Make 'sash' toor's shell. Done. Thanks for

Re: Adding a superuser

2000-01-10 Thread John Hasler
Brian Servis writes: If sh - ash and 'things break' then those 'things' should call bash or whatever shell explicitly, and a bug report should be filed against that 'thing' . Yes, of course. However, the gentleman's goal appears to be improved robustness, not Debian debugging. I have had sh

Re: Adding a superuser

2000-01-10 Thread William T Wilson
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Patrick Kirk wrote: I need to add a second superuser. No you don't. If you want someone else to have root access, then just give them the root password. If you want someone else to be able to do some root tasks but not really be root, you have two choices. 1) Make the

Re: Adding a superuser

2000-01-10 Thread Patrick Kirk
Thinking about it, you're right so I won't use it. Thanks.

Re: Adding a superuser

2000-01-10 Thread Patrick Kirk
Thinking about it, you're right. Thanks. Patrick

Re: Adding a superuser

2000-01-10 Thread Joe Block
William T Wilson wrote: On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Patrick Kirk wrote: I need to add a second superuser. No you don't. If you want someone else to have root access, then just give them the root password. If you want someone else to be able to do some root tasks but not really be root,