> Carey Evans writes:
Carey> For example, my ISP adds X-Envelope-To: and Return-Path:
Carey> headers which is all the extra OOB information.
You've got a very nice ISP :-)
kai
--
A large number of young women don't trust men with beards.
(BFBS Radio)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILIN
> How does fetchmail deal with mailing lists? I'd imagine that all that
> fetchmail can do is look at the To and Cc headers which aren't very
> useful for mailing lists.
Fetchmail can (I think) be configured to pass all retrieved mail to
sendmail or whatever mta that you have. Sendmail would th
Kai writes:
> How does fetchmail deal with mailing lists?
Poorly: that's the catch (according to the documentation: I've not tried
this).
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL
Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> How does fetchmail deal with mailing lists? I'd imagine that all that
> fetchmail can do is look at the To and Cc headers which aren't very
> useful for mailing lists.
It can use some headers to extract appropriate info. if they exist.
For ex
> George Bonser writes:
George> ...and they are fetched individually.
> jghasler writes:
John> You can put all the mail for each branch office in one
John> mailbox. Fetchmail can sort them out.
How does fetchmail deal with mailing lists? I'd imagine that all that
fetchmail can
Hello everyone,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: You may be right in suggesting uucp to the originator of this thread,
: though. He should take a look at the bear book (Managing uucp and Usenet,
: O`Reilly).
I am the originator of this thread and yes, I'll go with UUCP. For what
I've heard in the thr
Heiko writes:
> You should ask your provider for an UUCP account, this will show you the
> qualification of your ISP.
I got my news and email via uucp for years. I'm not about to ask my
present ISP about it, though. They are the only ISP I can reach without a
long distance call, and view anyone
On Jun 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
: > ... but what about sending messages from a disconneted site to the world?
:
: Do what all us poor smucks who have only part-time dial-up connections do:
: configure smail with smart_host= and queue_only, and
: run smail -q from ip-up.
IMHO the very best solu
Randy writes:
> I'd love to queue outgoing messages up and have ip-up send them off with
> a smail -q command but looking through the man page and
> /usr/doc/smail/guide/config I cannot find anything about this queue_only
> option. Where should it go...
Put 'queue_only' in /etc/smail/config. Thi
> Do what all us poor smucks who have only part-time dial-up connections do:
> configure smail with smart_host= and queue_only, and
> run smail -q from ip-up.
John, I've got a quick question for you. I'm running smail with Debian
1.3 and am using a similar part-time dial-up dynamic ISP link wi
George Bonser writes:
> The disadvantage to fetchmail is that the sysadmin will need the
> username/password of all of the pop3 boxes...
These need not be the same as the usernames and passwords that the users
use on the clients.
> ...and they are fetched individually.
You can put all the mail f
> ... but what about sending messages from a disconneted site to the world?
Do what all us poor smucks who have only part-time dial-up connections do:
configure smail with smart_host= and queue_only, and
run smail -q from ip-up.
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwo
> Right, the Debian box at the main office is full time connected to the
> Internete. I want to do what you are saying: have this main server accepting
> e-mail from the world to users in my UUCP domains and transfer them to
> the remote servers when the UUCP link starts. This sounds like an intere
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> : Eloy A. Paris writes:
> : > I want to do what you are saying: have this main server accepting e-mail
> : > from the world to users in my UUCP domains and transfer them to the
> : > remote servers when the UUCP link starts.
> :
> : Have you considered the multidrop op
> : Have you considered the multidrop option in fetchmail?
>
> Uhhmmm... no, I haven't. I haven't ever used fetchmail but I guess this
> you are recommending would solve the problem of checking e-mail from
> remote sites and saving bandwitdth and transfer time, but what about
> sending messages f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Eloy A. Paris writes:
: > I want to do what you are saying: have this main server accepting e-mail
: > from the world to users in my UUCP domains and transfer them to the
: > remote servers when the UUCP link starts.
:
: Have you considered the multidrop option in fetchm
Eloy A. Paris writes:
> I want to do what you are saying: have this main server accepting e-mail
> from the world to users in my UUCP domains and transfer them to the
> remote servers when the UUCP link starts.
Have you considered the multidrop option in fetchmail?
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (
Leslie Mikesell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: > > This is EXACTLY the environment that UUCP was designed to operate in.
: >
: > My apologies then. Now it seems to me this was a dumb question :-)
: >
: > I'll start digging in how to configure my Debian boxes and sendmail
: > to do the trick.
:
:
> > This is EXACTLY the environment that UUCP was designed to operate in.
>
> My apologies then. Now it seems to me this was a dumb question :-)
>
> I'll start digging in how to configure my Debian boxes and sendmail
> to do the trick.
But times have changed a lot since the days when the only
Hi,
> >
> > I am also thinking this is a job for the old UUCP.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
>
> This is EXACTLY the environment that UUCP was designed to operate in.
My apologies then. Now it seems to me this was a dumb question :-)
I'll start digging in how to configure my Debian boxes and sendma
>
> I am also thinking this is a job for the old UUCP.
>
> Regards,
>
This is EXACTLY the environment that UUCP was designed to operate in.
George Bonser
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
T
Hi again,
> Eloy A. Paris said:
> >
> > Each office will have its own LAN (Ethernet). I don't want the users at each
> > office to deal with PPP/dial-up connections. As a matter of fact, all
> > the users at these remote offices are users POP through a dial-up PPP
> > connection to send/receive e
Hi,
> If the users on the remote systems have accounts on the e-mail system,
> couldn't they just login and read mail like standard users? Another
> option would be POP or (possibly) IMAP. If what you're describing is
> close to the way an ISP would handle user mail, go with POP.
Sorry for the
23 matches
Mail list logo
