On 2009-12-25 07:55 +0100, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Sorry to send this message twice, but I thought that for some reason it
had not arrived at the list. Although it seems that both messages
arrived with a delay of six hours. This can be due to some moderation of
the list?
This list is not
Hi, Sven.
On Friday, 25 December 2009 09:53:53 +0100,
Sven Joachim wrote:
Sorry to send this message twice, but I thought that for some reason
it had not arrived at the list. Although it seems that both messages
arrived with a delay of six hours. This can be due to some
moderation of the
On Wednesday, 23 December 2009 11:19:26 +0100,
Sven Joachim wrote:
b) Debian way compilation:
b.1) Having booted an i386 kernel and userland 32:
# cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config
# make ARCH=x86_64 menuconfig
# fakeroot make-kpkg clean --cross-compile - -arch amd64
#
On 2009-12-17 at 21:32:59 -300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Hi all!
I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org.
Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian
GNU/Linux repositories.
In order to generate the configuration, I've copied the file
Hi, Sven.
On Wednesday, 23 December 2009 11:19:26 +0100,
Sven Joachim wrote:
b) Debian way compilation:
b.1) Having booted an i386 kernel and userland 32:
# cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config
# make ARCH=x86_64 menuconfig
# fakeroot make-kpkg clean --cross-compile - -arch
Sorry to send this message twice, but I thought that for some reason it
had not arrived at the list. Although it seems that both messages
arrived with a delay of six hours. This can be due to some moderation of
the list?
On Thursday, 24 December 2009 09:45:54 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
On Saturday, 19 December 2009 16:19:31 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
I assume that it must have differences between both kernels
versions; for that reason, as I've mentioned in another mail of
this thread, after to have copied the file, I followed a similar
procedure to which mentioned
On 2009-12-23 11:07 +0100, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Reading [1] and [2], I already found the cause of this problem. The
configuration in Executable file formats / Emulations must be the
following one in order to use a kernel x86_64 in userland 32.
[*] Kernel support for ELF binaries
[ ] Write
Hi, Sven.
On Friday, 18 December 2009 17:34:22 +0100,
Sven Joachim wrote:
I was trying installing and booting 2.6.26-2-amd64 kernel and then
compiling 2.6.32 kernel of the traditional way:
# cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.32
# cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config
# make menuconfig
# make
On 2009-12-18 01:32 +0100, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org.
Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian
GNU/Linux repositories.
In order to generate the configuration, I've copied the file
corresponding to
Hi, Sven.
On Friday, 18 December 2009 09:15:43 +0100,
Sven Joachim wrote:
I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of
kernel.org. Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of
the Debian GNU/Linux repositories.
In order to generate the configuration, I've
On 2009-12-18 16:56 +0100, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
I was trying installing and booting 2.6.26-2-amd64 kernel and then
compiling 2.6.32 kernel of the traditional way:
# cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.32
# cp /boot/config-`uname -r` ./.config
# make menuconfig
# make
In this case I didn't use the
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:32:59PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Hi all!
I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org.
Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian
GNU/Linux repositories.
In order to generate the configuration, I've copied the
Hi, Kumar.
On Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:40:07 -0600,
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I am trying to compile Linux 2.6.32 with the source code of kernel.org.
Kernel that I'm using at the moment is 2.6.26-2-686 of the Debian
GNU/Linux repositories.
In order to generate the configuration, I've
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:26:39PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Well, the kernel build does check what your current config is, and
based on that, asks you some new questions. One way I get around this
is:
cd kernel-build-directory
cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) .config
make menuconfig
Hi, Kumar.
On Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:34:09 -0600,
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:26:39PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Well, the kernel build does check what your current config is, and
based on that, asks you some new questions. One way I get around this
is:
Dear Daniel,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:41:11PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
[snip menuconfig discussion]
This only works in the case of not using ARCH=x86_64 with make
menuconfig in the second time that is invoked. But when not using this
variable, the processor family returns to be like
Hey,
Thx everybody for your quick answers and friendly help.
You were right. I removed all Xen options from the kernel config and
linux-image-2.6.32-rc5_20091016-2_amd64.deb
has been built.
Installing it with dpkg -i ... worked fine.
The only problem to be solved was the initrd. it has NOT
Gregor Galwas wrote:
Hey,
Thx everybody for your quick answers and friendly help.
You were right. I removed all Xen options from the kernel config and
linux-image-2.6.32-rc5_20091016-2_amd64.deb
has been built.
Installing it with dpkg -i ... worked fine.
The only problem to be
On Wed, Oct 21 2009, Gregor Galwas wrote:
The only problem to be solved was the initrd. it has NOT been
generated by dpkg during the installation.
so I generated it using mkinitramfs -c -k 2.6.32-rc5. worked
fine. update-grub - worked fine as well.
,[ Manual page make-kpkg(1) ]
|
Hi,
Well, firstly, if you are going to be using the buildpackage
target, instead of the far faster kernel_image target, you should
either configure /etc/kernel-pkg.conf, adding your name and email, and
have that in a keyring your gpg knows about, or pass the --us and --uc
arguments on
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:31:46PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
With this install of Debian I decided to stick to what I know, and
grabbed the binary installer direct from NVidia. I ran that, and in
less than two minutes I was up and running. No complaints from Debian
and no complaints from
* Chris Bannister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Apparently the binary installer from NVidia messes with the libraries on
the system and is not the recommended method for installing.
Read http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-nVidia/
The Debian way is certainly a lot easier. Now where has
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 13:29, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:31:46PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
With this install of Debian I decided to stick to what I know, and
grabbed the binary installer direct from NVidia. I ran that, and in
less than two minutes I was up and
On Wed October 25 2006 06:39, David Baron wrote:
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 13:29, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:31:46PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
With this install of Debian I decided to stick to what I know, and
grabbed the binary installer direct from NVidia. I ran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have gotten a couple DIFFERENT approaches to installing a kernel on
Debian.
At least one comment should send up a warning:
Yes, a level-minded user.
On compiling with --initrd, I finally drank the coolade last year.
Before I tried to have no
modules, compiling
John O'Hagan wrote:
On Sunday 22 October 2006 18:02, cothrige wrote:
[...]
In the past, as a Slackware user, I never installed an OS where I
didn't immediately compile a new kernel. Slack uses a 2.4 kernel, and
I use some peripheral items which seem to require, or at least greatly
prefer a
You have gotten a couple DIFFERENT approaches to installing a kernel on
Debian.
At least one comment should send up a warning:
if the approach becomes too intricate, or requires specialization,
very likely you read minute details that you should never need learn
(unless you're creating Debian
I look here when I compile my own kernel:
http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/
/David.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Jameson C. Burt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You have gotten a couple DIFFERENT approaches to installing a kernel on
Debian.
At least one comment should send up a warning:
if the approach becomes too intricate, or requires specialization,
very likely you read minute details that you should
cothrige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure this is a really stupid question, but having read through
the reference and searched online (some searches involve such common
terms they never return anything useful) I have really been unable to
find a clear answer. I hope someone here can help.
For more than a year I compile my kernels the way you described
(universal vay) and I have no problems. Of course there is a debian
way but it's not a must.
Regards,
Seweryn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrick,
Its relatively easy .. and you can make it a bit easier on yourself.
Untar from kernel.org in /usr/src
be sure ncurses-dev and ncurses are present
make menuconfig and configure your kernel
now make (or make -j xx, where xx = # of cpu's if 1) [ fancy gcc hacks
go here if your brave
On Sunday 22 October 2006 18:02, cothrige wrote:
[...]
In the past, as a Slackware user, I never installed an OS where I
didn't immediately compile a new kernel. Slack uses a 2.4 kernel, and
I use some peripheral items which seem to require, or at least greatly
prefer a 2.6 kernel. The
* John O'Hagan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Hello John,
I always compile my own kernels the Debian (testing) way like this:
-Install the latest Debian linux-source package (currently
linux-source-2.6.17); or you can use vanilla source as you describe
-Make a symlink
* Tim Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello Tim,
[snip]
Then make your initrd if needed and tweak as needed, verify /etc/modules
is what you want it to be and you should be good to go. Cross your
fingers and reboot.
This makes me think. Recently I have gotten in the habit, after
installing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/22/06 09:36, cothrige wrote:
* John O'Hagan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Hello John,
[snip]
If you are recompiling a kernel with the same version name, you must
move /lib/modules/[$KERNEL_VERSION] out of the way (you are
Le dimanche 22 octobre 2006 16:43, cothrige a écrit :
* Tim Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello Tim,
[snip]
Then make your initrd if needed and tweak as needed, verify /etc/modules
is what you want it to be and you should be good to go. Cross your
fingers and reboot.
This makes me
On Monday 23 October 2006 00:36, cothrige wrote:
* John O'Hagan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip summary of Debian kernel compilation]
Will I still have to configure grub? And will update-grub work or
will I have to manually edit menu.lst?
[...]
Installing the kernel-package generated by
depmod should be called by the makefile upon make modules_install after
a successful build. Its really as easy as make, make modules_install ,
make install and a mkinitrd (if you need one).
If using GRUB, remember by default the selection menu is hidden. You'll
need to comment out the hiddenmenu
* Tim Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
depmod should be called by the makefile upon make modules_install after
a successful build. Its really as easy as make, make modules_install ,
make install and a mkinitrd (if you need one).
If using GRUB, remember by default the selection menu is
* Gilles Mocellin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This modprobe.conf is modularized in several files (you can add one)
in /etc/modprobe.d/.
Ahh yes, I see that. I would think I could run
'generate-modprobe.conf ~/modprobe.conf' and then split the info up
as I need it. Shouldn't be too
* John O'Hagan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Installing the kernel-package generated by make-kpkg will automatically
detect
and update grub, and add itself to menu.list. How easy is that?
Now that it is a nifty feature. I suppose there is certainly
something to be said for the Debian
cothrige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have never used initrd, at least not when I have compiled a kernel.
To be entirely honest I have never fully understood just what it
does. I was under the impression it was for things like booting from
reiser fs and having to load modules to do it.
cothrige wrote:
* Tim Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
depmod should be called by the makefile upon make modules_install after
a successful build. Its really as easy as make, make modules_install ,
make install and a mkinitrd (if you need one).
If using GRUB, remember by default the
* Andrei Popescu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
initrd's are especially useful for distros, because a kernel with all
stuff compiled in is not an option (too big), but you still need some
of the modules very early in the boot process, when the root filesystem
is not accessible yet. For your
Hiya LV,
I have been using 2.6.15 for about a week now. It's fantastic. Seems to
be faster than 2.6.8. I have scanning, sound, USB, cd burning, rsync,
nfs. All works well. I used the kernel from kernel.org. I didn't bother
with the ramdisk. Seems to be a waste of time.
I followed the
On 3/1/06, Glenn Meehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using 2.6.15 for about a week now. It's fantastic. Seems to
be faster than 2.6.8. I have scanning, sound, USB, cd burning, rsync,
nfs. All works well. I used the kernel from kernel.org. I didn't bother
with the ramdisk. Seems to be a
I need to compile a custom kernel, to add raid and a scsi driver. Is
the kernel that comes with sarge just from kernel.org or does it have
some kind of security patches?
If it is just from kernel.org, is it best to use the latest kernel?
thanks william
You may know about this - but this is
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 20:11 -0400, William wrote:
I need to compile a custom kernel, to add raid and a scsi driver. Is
the kernel that comes with sarge just from kernel.org or does it have
some kind of security patches?
If it is just from kernel.org, is it best to use the latest kernel?
If
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 20:11 -0400, William wrote:
I need to compile a custom kernel, to add raid and a scsi driver. Is
the kernel that comes with sarge just from kernel.org or does it have
some kind of security patches?
If it is just from kernel.org, is it best to use the latest kernel?
OK, I've tried recompiling 2.6.9 with the various options I think I want,
setting some items as modules and so on. make-kpkg runs for ages, lots of
screen output (lists of files or modules with CC next to them, etc) and then
I get lots of unrecognised symbol errors (I think that's what it
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 16:03 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I've tried recompiling 2.6.9 with the various options I think I want,
setting some items as modules and so on. make-kpkg runs for ages, lots of
screen output (lists of files or modules with CC next to them, etc) and then
I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kernels, some even boot but none does what I want. One thing I need to
know is how to get modules to compile... there doesn't seem to be any
Most modules come with the kernel source code, you just have to compile
them as modules (i.e. 'm' instead of 'y' or space in
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:00:11 +0100, Titus Barik wrote:
I'm trying to compile the plex86-kernel-src package using the stock
2.6.3 kernel from kernel.org on Debian/unstable to no avail.
host-linux.c:27:31: linux/modversions.h: No such file or directory
Replace any
#include
Brian wrote:
I want to be able to turn some options off and on in the kerenl so how
do i compile the kernel in a debian system???
Thanks
Brian
Look at this site: http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/
It has a very comprehensive explanation on how to compile
your own kernel the Debian way. It's
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 12:13:05AM -0600, Brian wrote:
I want to be able to turn some options off and on in the kerenl so how
do i compile the kernel in a debian system???
install kernel-package with apt-get and then use make-kpkg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:02:28AM -0600, John Foster wrote:
Joseph Jones wrote:
I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my laptop's
NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install from. Could
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:16:25 -0800,
Scarletdown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am once again giving a whirl at compiling a 2.4.22 kernel; this
time on my test box which I am telnetted into so I don't have to
keep switching back and forth via the KV switch.
On Thursday 11 Dec 2003 6:16 am, Scarletdown wrote:
I am once again giving a whirl at compiling a 2.4.22 kernel; this
time on my test box which I am telnetted into so I don't have to
keep switching back and forth via the KV switch.
Anyway, I managed to unpack the tarball and create the
* Monique Y. Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-11 05:43]:
Btw, I just discovered that lilo bug #222098 appears to still be live in
1:22.5.8-6. It prevents me from running lilo successfully. So caveat
emptor and all that ...
Hmm, same problem here. looked for a bug report, didn't see it was
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 at 03:00 GMT, Paul Stolp penned:
* Monique Y. Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-11 05:43]:
Btw, I just discovered that lilo bug #222098 appears to still be live
in 1:22.5.8-6. It prevents me from running lilo successfully. So
caveat emptor and all that ...
Hmm, same
Joseph Jones wrote:
I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my laptop's
NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install from. Could
anyone advise me as to how I do this, if possible in relation to the
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 at 16:02 GMT, John Foster penned:
Joseph Jones wrote:
I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my
laptop's NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install
from. Could anyone advise
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
dselect #get latest kernel src package
cd /usr/src/kernel-source-version
make mrproper #clean any leftover compile stuff
I tried this a few days ago, but I hadn't read the makefile to know what
mrproper was doing and I lost my old config file which I had renamed,
IIRC,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 at 19:35 GMT, H. S. penned:
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
dselect #get latest kernel src package cd
/usr/src/kernel-source-version make mrproper #clean any leftover
compile stuff
I tried this a few days ago, but I hadn't read the makefile to know
what mrproper was doing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 December 2003 20:35, H. S. wrote:
So now if I use mrproper, I *always* save my .config to some other
directory, in my case in a tmp in a user's home.
-HS
That's what I am doing for every kernel I compile, for every one of my
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 at 16:02 GMT, John Foster penned:
Joseph Jones wrote:
I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my
laptop's NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install
try using libncurses5 and libncurses5-dev
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 00:16, Scarletdown wrote:
I am once again giving a whirl at compiling a 2.4.22 kernel; this time
on my test box which I am telnetted into so I don't have to keep
switching back and forth via the KV switch.
Anyway, I managed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:00:16PM +, Joseph Jones wrote:
I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my laptop's
NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network
On Saturday 05 July 2003 5:09 am, Christophe Courtois wrote:
Le Samedi 5 Juillet 2003 10:24, Marino Fernandez a déclamé :
Yes, that's what it seems. I had the same problem with 2.4.21... GCC
2.95 and 3.2 work, but no 3.3.
From a practical standpoint (in other words... have I noticed anything
On Saturday 05 July 2003 2:49 am, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
Hi
I tried to compile a 2.4.20 kernel with GCC 3.3 and failed.
I searched through several list and the web to find more infos. I found
some docs about GCC3.1 and its implemetation (wich isnt).
Just to be sure: We still must use GCC
Le Samedi 5 Juillet 2003 10:24, Marino Fernandez a déclamé :
Yes, that's what it seems. I had the same problem with 2.4.21... GCC
2.95 and 3.2 work, but no 3.3.
I compile with 2.95 ; is there a difference for a user with 3.2 ?
--
Christophe Courtois - Ostwald, Alsace, France
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003 09:49:05 +0200
Raffaele Sandrini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I tried to compile a 2.4.20 kernel with GCC 3.3 and failed.
I searched through several list and the web to find more infos. I found
some docs about GCC3.1 and its implemetation (wich isnt).
Just to be sure:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Joris Huizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I might need to set Advanced partition
selection on and select some
partition types there - but I'm not at all sure (I'm
just curious why it's off)
You don't need any Advanced partition types enabled. I
Hello everybody,
In case you allready received this question (or even
answered ??) I apologise, but I have seen no
reactions, or my own question, so I guess something
has gone wrong
The thing is, I can't figure out what's option I
should choose which is currently off. As I thought I
might have
Joris writes:
In case you allready received this question (or even answered ??) I
apologise, but I have seen no reactions, or my own question, so I
guess something has gone wrong
The thing is, I can't figure out what's option I should choose which
is currently off. As I thought I might
Hello,
Thanks for your reply, Elizabeth !
I checked - but the Second extended fs support was
allready on.
I attached the current filesystem supports.
I think I might need to set Advanced partition
selection on and select some
partition types there - but I'm not at all sure (I'm
just curious
hey joris,
here's the first three steps i recommend:
# apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.20
# apt-get install kernel-package
$ cd /usr/share/doc/kernel-package
(if you're running woody, you want kernel-source-2.4.18 i believe)
debian really treats you well with kernel-compiling utilities and
In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
Hello everybody,
As I want scsi emulation, and I'm missing the sr_mod
module, I think I'll have to compile a new kernel.
What do I need to do for this, exactly? I'll have to
get the source, ofcourse, but next to that ?
I know allready before the
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 23:35:10 -0800 (PST)
Joris Huizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
As I want scsi emulation, and I'm missing the sr_mod
module, I think I'll have to compile a new kernel.
What do I need to do for this, exactly? I'll have to
get the source, ofcourse, but next
Am Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:10:08 +0200 schrieb Joris Huizer:
Hello everybody,
As I want scsi emulation, and I'm missing the sr_mod module, I think
I'll have to compile a new kernel.
What do I need to do for this, exactly? I'll have to get the source,
ofcourse, but next to that ?
Thanks everybody for the suggestions on a succesfull
kernel compilation
I now compiled it but it won't boot.
I get this error stuff - and I don't know what it
means :
--
request_module[block_major-3]: Root fs not mounted
UFS Cannot open root device 341 or 03:41
Please append a correct
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:53:43 -0800 (PST)
Joris Huizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
request_module[block_major-3]: Root fs not mounted
UFS Cannot open root device 341 or 03:41
Please append a correct root boot option
kernel panic: UFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03.41
It looks like you didn't
Alex Malinovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been rolling my own kernel using make-kpkg and the other wonderful
tools we Debianites have at our disposal for over a year now, yet
something just occured to me. Is it possible to compile individual
kernel modules outside of the actual kernel
Alex Malinovich wrote:
I've been rolling my own kernel using make-kpkg and the other wonderful
tools we Debianites have at our disposal for over a year now, yet
something just occured to me. Is it possible to compile individual
kernel modules outside of the actual kernel compilation? I still have
nate said:
Gerald V. Livingston II said:
Is there any special info on getting a 2.4.20 kernel to compile
under
woody on a Sun UltraSparc-1 Creator.
I'm not sure how closely you track the kernel but I've read several
places that the generic kernel is rarely the choice for anything
other
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 01:40:51AM -0600, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
Is there any special info on getting a 2.4.20 kernel to compile under
woody on a Sun UltraSparc-1 Creator.
Yes, the Debian Way (tm) -- or not, I don't care. Right now it fails
at the make dep stage using either method.
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 12:02:33AM -0800, nate wrote:
I don't have personal experience with linux on sparc yet, Downloading
the woody ISOs for it now and plan to install it on my ultra 1 probably
tomorrow though.
Don't waste time with the ISOs. Set up a RARP server and TFTP server
on an
Nathan E Norman said:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 01:40:51AM -0600, Gerald V. Livingston II
wrote:
Is there any special info on getting a 2.4.20 kernel to compile
under
woody on a Sun UltraSparc-1 Creator.
Yes, the Debian Way (tm) -- or not, I don't care. Right now it fails
at the make dep
Nathan E Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, 2.4.20 is not the kernel you want if you run ext3 filesystems.
OTOH, 2.4.19 seems to not want to provide DRM support for the Creator.
2.4.20 ext3 is OK as long as you don't enable data=journal (the default
is data=ordered).
--
Debian GNU/Linux
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 11:40:27AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
Nathan E Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, 2.4.20 is not the kernel you want if you run ext3 filesystems.
OTOH, 2.4.19 seems to not want to provide DRM support for the Creator.
2.4.20 ext3 is OK as long as you don't enable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 30 November 2002 4:48 pm, Aedificator wrote:
What compiler and which version do I need to compile nVidia's kernel part
of the driver? It might be the same as of the GLX part but I'm not sure.
It works for me with gcc 2.95
Why are you
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 05:48:43PM +0100, Aedificator wrote:
What compiler and which version do I need to compile nVidia's kernel part of
the driver? It might be the same as of the GLX part but I'm not sure.
Whatever's the current gcc seems to be working just fine for me...
--
.''`.
Alex Malinovich, 2002-Oct-15 16:07 -0500:
I've got an Athlon XP 2000 system running as my desktop machine. I've
also got a PIII 850 laptop and a p133 mail server. While recompiling the
kernel on the laptop isn't too time consuming it still takes almost
twice as long as it does on my desktop.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 04:07:04PM -0500, Alex Malinovich wrote:
I've got an Athlon XP 2000 system running as my desktop machine. I've
also got a PIII 850 laptop and a p133 mail server. While recompiling the
kernel on the laptop isn't too time consuming it still takes almost
twice as long as
Use the guide on this site http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/tutorials/kernel-pkg.en/intro-kernel-pkg.html
Cheers.
Jonas
-Original Message-
From: Tuomo Karhu
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 4 maj 2002 14:08
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: compiling a
If you want it really really short
apt-cache search kernel-image
You will get a variety of hits
Choose 1
apt-get install kernel-image...
You dont need anything else, It will modify lilo.conf, etc etc, and you just
reboot :)
If you wanna really compile a kernel, In debian you can use some
On Sat, 2002-05-04 at 08:08, Tuomo Karhu wrote:
Could you give me main commands and short help/explanation howto compile
debian kernel?
Thanks.
Tuomo Karhu
Check out chapter 9 of the Debian FAQ:
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-kernel.html
Nick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sat May 04, 2002 at 03:45:42PM -0400, Kapil Khosla wrote:
If you want it really really short
apt-cache search kernel-image
You will get a variety of hits
Choose 1
apt-get install kernel-image...
You dont need anything else, It will modify lilo.conf, etc etc, and you just
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
