On Thu, 31 May 2007 18:09:38 +0100
Jaime Ventura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Im new to debian and was trying to install gfs-tools using
> aptitude("aptitude install gfs-tools")
> It cant find it.
> My source list is the default one.
> Do I need any extra source?
> Is downloading it fro
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:44:16PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:07:30 -0500
> "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:54:02PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:19:23 +
> > > Phil Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:07:30 -0500
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:54:02PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:19:23 +
> > Phil Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I accept all of that. My main point was how misleading i
On Monday 26 February 2007 17:19, Phil Walton wrote:
stuff snipped
> I accept all of that. My main point was how misleading it is to be
> publishing headlines about an "upcoming" release when clearly nothing of
> the sort exists.
REPLY
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 03:21:51PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Roberto writes:
> > Strictly speaking, it's not all RC bugs. I forget, but I think the
> > target was when only 80-100 RC bugs remain affecting Etch.
>
> It also matters where the bugs are. "Minor" packages that have RC bugs at
> rel
Roberto writes:
> Strictly speaking, it's not all RC bugs. I forget, but I think the
> target was when only 80-100 RC bugs remain affecting Etch.
It also matters where the bugs are. "Minor" packages that have RC bugs at
release time will be dropped. Right now the major holdup is the kernel.
--
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:54:02PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:19:23 +
> Phil Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I accept all of that. My main point was how misleading it is to be
> > publishing headlines about an "upcoming" release when clearly nothing
> > of t
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:19:23 +
Phil Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I accept all of that. My main point was how misleading it is to be
> publishing headlines about an "upcoming" release when clearly nothing
> of the sort exists.
In Debian terms the release *is* very close. Etch is in ful
shad up eh
On 2/26/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:20:44PM +, Doofus wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> >On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:58 +, Doofus wrote:
> >
> >>When?
> >>
> >>For the past seven months we've had under the "news" section at
> >>deb
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:20:44PM +, Doofus wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> >On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:58 +, Doofus wrote:
> >
> >>When?
> >>
> >>For the past seven months we've had under the "news" section at
> >>debian.org:
> >>
> >>"Upcoming Release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0"
> >>
> >>Upc
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:58 +, Doofus wrote:
When?
For the past seven months we've had under the "news" section at
debian.org:
"Upcoming Release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0"
Upcoming. Is this an off-beat sense of humour on the part of the
developers?
Considerin
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:58 +, Doofus wrote:
When?
For the past seven months we've had under the "news" section at
debian.org:
"Upcoming Release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0"
Upcoming. Is this an off-beat sense of humour on the part of the
developers?
Considerin
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:58 +, Doofus wrote:
> When?
>
> For the past seven months we've had under the "news" section at debian.org:
>
> "Upcoming Release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0"
>
> Upcoming. Is this an off-beat sense of humour on the part of the developers?
Considering how long it took S
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 06:58:22PM +, Doofus wrote:
> When?
>
> For the past seven months we've had under the "news" section at debian.org:
>
> "Upcoming Release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0"
>
> Upcoming. Is this an off-beat sense of humour on the part of the developers?
>
>
Debian 4.0 (Etch)
14 matches
Mail list logo
