On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 24 Apr 2015 at 12:37:36 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
>
>> I try to keep my system as close to 100% stable as possible. In spite
>> of this, a version of libp11-kit0 that is ahead of stable "somehow"
>> snuck into my system:
>>
>> $ apt-cache
Kynn Jones wrote:
> I try to keep my system as close to 100% stable as possible. In spite
> of this, a version of libp11-kit0 that is ahead of stable "somehow"
> snuck into my system:
>
> $ apt-cache policy libp11-kit0
> libp11-kit0:
> Installed: 0.20.7-1~bpo70+1
> Candidate:
On Fri 24 Apr 2015 at 18:50:30 +0100, Brian wrote:
> Bug makes interesting reading; especially when it contains
#764982 in case anyone was wondering, :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
On Fri 24 Apr 2015 at 12:37:36 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
> I try to keep my system as close to 100% stable as possible. In spite
> of this, a version of libp11-kit0 that is ahead of stable "somehow"
> snuck into my system:
>
> $ apt-cache policy libp11-kit0
> libp11-kit0:
> Installe
Kynn Jones wrote:
> $ apt-cache policy libp11-kit0
> libp11-kit0:
> Installed: 0.20.7-1~bpo70+1
> Candidate: 0.20.7-1~bpo70+1
> Version table:
> *** 0.20.7-1~bpo70+1 0
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> 0.12-3 0
> 500 http://debian.csail.mit
5 matches
Mail list logo