Gregory Seidman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:42:17PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt wrote:
[...]
} Ok, I'm not arguing pro/con Java here, I just have question. What other
} option do I have for web browser enabled client/server communication
} without reloading the page* that I can use in Koqueror or
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:42:17PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt wrote:
Ok, I'm not arguing pro/con Java here, I just have question. What other
option do I have for web browser enabled client/server communication
without reloading the p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 10:23:24AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Flash. Not that I'm promoting it, I'm just saying it's an alternative.
>
> And a god damned fscking bad one at that! I utterly hate and *loathe*
> web-sites that have Flash-based advert
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 06:40, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:42:17PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt wrote:
> [...]
> } Ok, I'm not arguing pro/con Java here, I just have question. What other
> } option do I have for web browser enabled client/server communication
> } without reloading t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 07:40:49AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> } Ok, I'm not arguing pro/con Java here, I just have question. What other
> } option do I have for web browser enabled client/server communication
> } without reloading the page* that
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:42:17PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt wrote:
[...]
} Ok, I'm not arguing pro/con Java here, I just have question. What other
} option do I have for web browser enabled client/server communication
} without reloading the page* that I can use in Koqueror or other
} non-mainstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:42:17PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt wrote:
> Ok, I'm not arguing pro/con Java here, I just have question. What other
> option do I have for web browser enabled client/server communication
> without reloading the page* that I can u
bob parker wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 19:18, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:06:23AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Or the poster doesn't know much about Java. Having used Java, I'd
say that Java isn't good for small programs/quick hacks.
And what I've seen of the larger
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 11:54, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:08:13AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > And what I've seen of the larger stuff in Java, it's horrably slow and
> > > unreliable. So if it's too elephantine for little
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 19:18, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:06:23AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Or the poster doesn't know much about Java. Having used Java, I'd
> > say that Java isn't good for small programs/quick hacks.
>
> And what I've seen of the larger stuff in Java, it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:08:13AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > And what I've seen of the larger stuff in Java, it's horrably slow and
> > unreliable. So if it's too elephantine for little stuff and two slow
> > and warped for the big stuff, just wha
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 04:18, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:06:23AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Or the poster doesn't know much about Java. Having used Java, I'd
> > say that Java isn't good for small programs/quick hacks.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 06:01:54PM +0200, Thomas Krennwallner wrote:
> For me its clear: use the language you think is good for completing a
> given task. I know you cannot always make this decision but if you have
> the chance, choose carefully ;-)
B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:47:10AM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> Java is garbage-collected
That's not entirely true, or Java would have self-collected before I
hit high school. 8:o)
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :
`. `'`
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:06:23AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Or the poster doesn't know much about Java. Having used Java, I'd
> say that Java isn't good for small programs/quick hacks.
And what I've seen of the larger stuff in Java, it's horrably
Hi!
On Thu Aug 28, 2003 at 03:14:25PM +0300, Alphonse Ogulla wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2003 11:16, you wrote:
you == Thomas Krennwallner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and I wrote it at Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:02:44 +0200
What's up with your MUA?
> > There is no such language which performs in all situat
On Thursday 28 Aug 2003 15:06, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Or the poster doesn't know much about Java. Having used Java, I'd
> say that Java isn't good for small programs/quick hacks.
True, ive personally found java very good for two situations;
1) writing a fast (as in programmer time) multiplatform g
Alphonse Ogulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> C, Erlang, Prolog, Perl, Python and C++ are all refered to in the above
> paragraph. Java is conspicuouly not mentioned. I construe that to mean Java
> is so much lacking in useful qualities to serve any practical purpose.
Java is garbage-collected,
Alphonse Ogulla declaimed:
> On Thursday 28 August 2003 11:16, you wrote:
> > There is no such language which performs in all situations well. C is
> > fast, but you have to code really careful and double-check your source.
> > Erlang was designed for telephony tasks (message passing, ...). Prolog
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 07:14, Alphonse Ogulla wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2003 11:16, you wrote:
> > There is no such language which performs in all situations well. C is
> > fast, but you have to code really careful and double-check your source.
> > Erlang was designed for telephony tasks (messa
On Thursday 28 August 2003 11:16, you wrote:
> There is no such language which performs in all situations well. C is
> fast, but you have to code really careful and double-check your source.
> Erlang was designed for telephony tasks (message passing, ...). Prolog
> is superior in expert systems. Pe
21 matches
Mail list logo
