On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Victor Porton wrote:
>
>
> I received no satisfactory answer.
> So I feel that there is no Debian policy on using port numbers.
> This policy should be added to Debian!
> It may be something like: "Debian packages (with default configuration) are
>
Hi.
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:23:36AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 02 October 2017 10:04:05 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 09:39:38AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 05:47:52PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > > Patches are welcome.
On Monday, October 02, 2017 09:39:38 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 05:47:52PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > Patches are welcome. File a bug against "grep" package, make a world a
> > better place.
>
> It has been my experience, in general, that man page patches are rarely
> welcome.
On Monday 02 October 2017 10:04:05 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 09:39:38AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 05:47:52PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > Patches are welcome. File a bug against "grep" package, make a
> > > world a better place.
> >
> > It has
Hi.
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 09:39:38AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 05:47:52PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > Patches are welcome. File a bug against "grep" package, make a world a
> > better place.
>
> It has been my experience, in general, that man page patches are
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 05:47:52PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Patches are welcome. File a bug against "grep" package, make a world a
> better place.
It has been my experience, in general, that man page patches are rarely
welcome. Especially by Debian packagers of programs that get their man
pages from
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:19:42AM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
Trouble with ports <1024 is that the process trying to use them will
need root permissions to bind to the port. This may cause its own
fallout rather than using something in the upper range.
And the advantage of such a port is that
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2017 03:34:19 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 01:28:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > > > Assuring that my port is not in this IANA list is not enough to
>> > > > ensure that my port number will not clash with a port
shawn wilson wrote:
> [...]
> Lastly, certain ports are so old, their intended services shouldn't be
> online anymore (see the first 20 ports or 90-110 - off the top of my
> head - not sitting here and going through them) or if the service
> probably won't be used in ICS or on a box designed to be
On Sunday 01 October 2017 10:55:33 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 10:45:53AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 October 2017 10:11:48 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:48:16AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > -I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 10:45:53AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2017 10:11:48 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:48:16AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > -I Process a binary file as if
Hi.
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 10:45:53AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2017 10:11:48 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:48:16AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > -I Process a binary file as if it did not contain matching data;
On Sunday 01 October 2017 10:11:48 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:48:16AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > -I Process a binary file as if it did not contain matching data;
> > this is equivalent to the --binary-files=without-match option.
> >
> > Sure, thats
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:48:16AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> -I Process a binary file as if it did not contain matching data; this
> is equivalent to the --binary-files=without-match option.
>
> Sure, thats supposed to tell me it will
On Sunday 01 October 2017 08:13:00 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 07:43:47AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 October 2017 03:34:19 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 01:28:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > > >
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 03:44:45PM +0300, Victor Porton wrote:
I received no satisfactory answer.
So I feel that there is no Debian policy on using port numbers.
This policy should be added to Debian!
It may be something like: "Debian packages (with default configuration) are
allowed to bind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 03:44:45PM +0300, Victor Porton wrote:
> Victor Porton wrote:
>
> > We are going to install a range of software on a Debian Linux
> > installation. Because we run the same software (such as Celery) several
> > times, we need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 03:13:00PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
[...]
> You haven't looked hard enough. It's "grep -I".
> Those manpages, sometimes reading them works wonders.
Messages crossed. Great minds think alike ;-)
Cheers
- -- t
Victor Porton wrote:
> We are going to install a range of software on a Debian Linux
> installation. Because we run the same software (such as Celery) several
> times, we need to use port numbers different than the standard Debian port
> numbers chosen by default (because we can't run more than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 07:43:47AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2017 03:34:19 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 01:28:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > > Assuring that my port is not in
Hi.
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 07:43:47AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2017 03:34:19 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 01:28:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > > Assuring that my port is not in this IANA list is not enough to
>
On Sunday 01 October 2017 03:34:19 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 01:28:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > Assuring that my port is not in this IANA list is not enough to
> > > > ensure that my port number will not clash with a port number
> > > > used by a
Victor Porton wrote:
> We are going to install a range of software on a Debian Linux
> installation. Because we run the same software (such as Celery) several
> times, we need to use port numbers different than the standard Debian port
> numbers chosen by default (because we can't run more than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:34:19AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> My advice [...]
Needless to say, I'd go with "simple", unless there's a very strong
reason against it. "Complex" is re-implementing the portmapper. Or
all those other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 01:28:39AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> > > Assuring that my port is not in this IANA list is not enough to
> > > ensure that my port number will not clash with a port number used by
> > > a Debian package (by default).
On Saturday 30 September 2017 22:28:45 Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> Ok, I will not waste my time to argue over obvious things.
> You won't get ports more "default" than from this list. Protocols,
> ports and service names are registered for a reason.
> Ex: If you install MySQL server it will
The answer is correct - IANA maintains the list of ports. You may also look
at the services file nmap maintains or ask showdan what it's seen publicly
if you want a public popularity contest of ports.
As it is, I'm pretty sure you're over engineering this. Have a config file
that has a port range
Ok, I will not waste my time to argue over obvious things.
You won't get ports more "default" than from this list. Protocols, ports
and service names are registered for a reason.
Ex: If you install MySQL server it will be configured to listen on port
3306\tcp by default on any OS, be it Debian,
Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> There is official list of all registered port numbers:
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.txt
>
> You can choose any port that is not in the list, to be sure they won't
> clash.
The list of port numbers you
There is official list of all registered port numbers:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.txt
You can choose any port that is not in the list, to be sure they won't
clash.
On 01.10.2017 06:04, Victor Porton wrote:
> We are going to install a
30 matches
Mail list logo