On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:12:39PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > CGA: 640 X 200 (8*8 font, 80chars * 25 lines)
> > > DCGA: 640 X 400 (8*16 font, 80chars * 25 lines)
> > > VGA: 640 x 480
> > > SVGA: 800 x 720
> > > XGA: 1024 x 768
> > > SXGA 1280 x1024
> > > UXGA: 1600 x1440
> >
>
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ross Boylan wrote:
> anything else). Second, you can change your font on the fly or via X
> resources or application default settings.
Indeed, I run a 20" Viewsonic 20G at the office here at 1600x1200. My
xterms are set to use a 10x20 font, and I use icewm with the blueHear
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 02:49:29AM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
> nate wrote:
> >Ross Boylan said:
> >
> >>I am looking for a way to get hardware accelerated 3d performance out of
> >>my video card. For reasons detailed below, this seems to come down to the
> >>need to start X in a lower resolution
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:12:39PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On a slightly different note, is there much point in going to the higher
> resolutions even if they are available? My monitor will go up to
> 1600x1440 but in practice I don't find any use in going above 1024x768.
> I know the argu
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 10:12, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2003, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:10:20PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:39:29PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:50:45PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
On 20 Jan 2003, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:10:20PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:39:29PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:50:45PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > > > all i can get is 800x600 which ain't much. :(
> > >
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:10:20PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:39:29PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:50:45PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > > all i can get is 800x600 which ain't much. :(
> > >
> > > i've googled for MEMOREX-TELEX (CDS-4583
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:39:29PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:50:45PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 02:49:29AM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
> > > What I do is just make up a second Section "Screen" in the same
> > > XF86Config-4 a
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:39:29PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:50:45PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > all i can get is 800x600 which ain't much. :(
> >
> > i've googled for MEMOREX-TELEX (CDS-4583) and haven't found much
> > in the way of answers for horiz/vert refr
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:50:45PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 02:49:29AM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
> > What I do is just make up a second Section "Screen" in the same
> > XF86Config-4 and give it its own identifier. When I want to use it I
> > just do:
> >
> > startx
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 02:49:29AM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
> What I do is just make up a second Section "Screen" in the same
> XF86Config-4 and give it its own identifier. When I want to use it I
> just do:
>
> startx -- :1 -screen
but how do you FIGURE OUT WHICH RESOLUTIONS your monitor c
nate wrote:
Ross Boylan said:
I am looking for a way to get hardware accelerated 3d performance out of
my video card. For reasons detailed below, this seems to come down to the
need to start X in a lower resolution and depth than I
customarily use. I am looking for a good way to do that, or th
Ross Boylan said:
> I am looking for a way to get hardware accelerated 3d performance out of
> my video card. For reasons detailed below, this seems to come down to the
> need to start X in a lower resolution and depth than I
> customarily use. I am looking for a good way to do that, or the
> enc
13 matches
Mail list logo
