Kevin Ross wrote:
From: Sthu Deus [mailto:sthu.d...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:31 AM
In the case of KDE, since no programs are using GTK, OOo would have to load
the GTK libraries fresh, which slows things down.
<...>
AFAIK: that 's fairly to the point (since s
> From: Sthu Deus [mailto:sthu.d...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:31 AM
>
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Ron:
>
> >I run Sid.
>
> Aha! - I run testing OO - even not whole my system.
>
> >Note also that OOo depends on Gtk, which might need also to be
> >loaded by KDE, but
On 04/22/2010 12:31 PM, Sthu Deus wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Ron:
I run Sid.
Aha! - I run testing OO - even not whole my system.
Note also that OOo depends on Gtk, which might need also to be
loaded by KDE, but not by GNOME or XFce.
Could You please extend this Your phrase
Thank You for Your time and answer, Ron:
>I run Sid.
Aha! - I run testing OO - even not whole my system.
>Note also that OOo depends on Gtk, which might need also to be
>loaded by KDE, but not by GNOME or XFce.
Could You please extend this Your phrase: how I/KDE can load the Gtk?
--
To UNSU
> Ron Johnson :
>> So, do You know how I can activate it in KDE 3.5 ?
>Nope. xfce is my preferred DE.
Just for information, it's mine too.
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement
+261 34 29 155 34 / +261 33
On 2010-04-21 08:58, Sthu Deus wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Ron:
For me, that version performs much better than an other than the old
1.x ones.
Then, something else You have that I do not (libs?) that prevent me from
running the testing repo OO...
I run Sid.
There was a feat
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:55:17 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
>
>>Life is hard :-)
>
> And I know what makes it harder! ;)
>
>>If OOo does not offer such feature anymore, you can get "preload¹" which
>>is... humm, a "preloader" daemon ;-)
>
> Thank You ag
Thank You for Your time and answer, Ron:
>For me, that version performs much better than an other than the old
>1.x ones.
Then, something else You have that I do not (libs?) that prevent me from
running the testing repo OO...
>There was a feature where GNOME or KDE would pre-load OOo at DE
>s
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
>Life is hard :-)
And I know what makes it harder! ;)
>If OOo does not offer such feature anymore, you can get "preload¹" which
>is... humm, a "preloader" daemon ;-)
Thank You again. Do I need to wait for some period when it will gather its
statis
On 2010-04-19 16:30, Clive McBarton wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
There use to be a "preloader", but I don't see it anymore.
There was a feature where GNOME or KDE would pre-load OOo at DE
startup. That way, it *appears* that OOo loads much faster, even though
it was really just shifted.
There'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> There use to be a "preloader", but I don't see it anymore.
>>
> There was a feature where GNOME or KDE would pre-load OOo at DE
> startup. That way, it *appears* that OOo loads much faster, even though
> it was really just shift
On 2010-04-19 13:11, Sthu Deus wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Ron:
What version is that? v3.2 from Sid opens much faster than any
other version I've seen.
3.2.0-4
For me, that version performs much better than an other than the old
1.x ones.
"Hang" has a specific meaning.
D
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 01:16:23 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
>
>>As Ron already said, review your system specs.
>>
>>OOo needs a lot of ram the first time it opens, and keeps consuming a
>>good quantity of your system resources as long as is loaded.
>
> Wo
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
>As Ron already said, review your system specs.
>
>OOo needs a lot of ram the first time it opens, and keeps consuming a
>good quantity of your system resources as long as is loaded.
Wow! What a product!
>In OOo 2.4 there is a "quick launch" option
Thank You for Your time and answer, Ron:
>What version is that? v3.2 from Sid opens much faster than any
>other version I've seen.
3.2.0-4
>"Hang" has a specific meaning.
>Do you mean "seemingly does nothing"?
Correct, just hangs for a while (no any responses) then opens the document.
>Upgra
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 02:25:38 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> I have oowriter from testing repo installed w/ all the necessary
> dependencies. Now at opening of the first document it hangs for about 40
> seconds - all other documents it opens quickly - the same is for oocalc.
>
> Is there anything I can
On 2010-04-13 23:24, Sthu Deus wrote:
Good day.
I have oowriter from testing repo installed w/ all the necessary
What version is that? v3.2 from Sid opens much faster than any
other version I've seen.
dependencies. Now at opening of the first document it hangs for
"Hang" has a specific
17 matches
Mail list logo
