Date sent: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 05:11:27 -0400
From: Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: KDE/Qt Status in Debian dists
> Just b
On Wed, 07 Apr 1999, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 05:11:27 -0400, Sean wrote:
> > Just bypass the whole package manager, download the source, compile and
> > install.
>
> Bypassing the package manager is usually a bad idea, unless you compile the
> source to install outside the p
J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 05:11:27 -0400, Sean wrote:
> > Just bypass the whole package manager, download the source, compile and
> > install.
>
> Bypassing the package manager is usually a bad idea, unless you compile the
> source to install outside the package manager contro
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 00:45:31 +, Terry Hancock wrote:
> On the Hamm CDs, the "Qt" library required by KDE is not included for
> licensing reasons.
> However, the Troll Tech website claims the newer versions of Qt are "free"
> software,
Qt 2.0 will be licensed under the QPL 1.0, which is a
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 05:11:27 -0400, Sean wrote:
> Just bypass the whole package manager, download the source, compile and
> install.
Bypassing the package manager is usually a bad idea, unless you compile the
source to install outside the package manager controlled directories, e.g.
by --prefi
Just bypass the whole package manager, download the source, compile and install.
This way when you decide to upgrade you won't have to worry about qt-kde getting
broken unless some of their support libraries change. And even if that does
happen,
it would just mean that you would need to recompile
6 matches
Mail list logo