Duarte
Usuário Linux #229528
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 01:05:04 -0200
Pr1nc3_0F_P3rS1a * [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Philipe Gaspar
To: Vitor Silva Souza , Lista Debian Português
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4 no Potato?
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 01:42:06 -0200
1. Eu quero manter o potato na minha máquina (não
, Lista Debian Português
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4 no Potato?
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 01:42:06 -0200
1. Eu quero manter o potato na minha máquina (não quero ficar
instalando
pacotes unstable), mas por motivos de força maior preciso rodar o
Kernel
2.4. Onde encontro um pacote deb do *source
At 15:19 16/12/2001 -0200, Raphael Derosso Pereira - DephiNit wrote:
Ele não quer um kernel pré compilado. Ele quer um .deb dos fontes, o qua nada
mais é do que o tar.bz2 do kernel.org mais alguns patches (às vezes)
aplicados para melhorar ou adicionar funções.
O que eu recomendo é pegar
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:07:04 -0200
Vitor Silva Souza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Alguém tem alguma URL para um guia de como compilar o kernel 2.4,
usando make-kpkg (acho que é esse o nome), mantendo dois kernels na mesma
máquina e etc?
isso é explicado no guia prático, que está no site
From: Philipe Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Vitor Silva Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Lista Debian Português" <DEBIAN-USER-PORTUGUESE@LISTS.DEBIAN.ORG>
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4 no Potato?
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 01:42:06 -0200
1. Eu quero manter o potato na mi
Em Saturday 15 December 2001 00:07, Vitor Silva Souza escreveu:
Pessoal,
Gostaria de fazer três perguntas:
1. Eu quero manter o potato na minha máquina (não quero ficar instalando
pacotes unstable), mas por motivos de força maior preciso rodar o Kernel
2.4. Onde encontro um
Eu acho que o que vc procura está aqui:
http://www.debian.org/News/2001/20010415
[]'s
At 00:07 15/12/2001 -0200, Vitor Silva Souza wrote:
Pessoal,
Gostaria de fazer três perguntas:
1. Eu quero manter o potato na minha máquina (não quero ficar
instalando pacotes unstable),
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, kubotek wrote:
Ale po zrestartowaniu kompa mam Kernel Panic unable to mount root on 03:01
A moze nie wkompilowales obslugi ext2?
Pozdrawiam.
--
Wojtek ---=== [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===--- Pietkiewicz
Świadomość - jest to emergentna własność 2-go rzędu struktur
Wojtek Pietkiewicz wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, kubotek wrote:
Ale po zrestartowaniu kompa mam Kernel Panic unable to mount root on 03:01
A moze nie wkompilowales obslugi ext2?
Pozdrawiam.
Nie do końca, w kernelach .deb wszystko jest w modułach. Nawet ext2 i obsługa
ide. Teraz pytanie czy
Le Vendredi 23 Novembre 2001 12:08, Jean-Christophe Boggio a écrit :
J'ai lu (ici?) il y a quelques semaines un post qui donnait quelques
liens pour le passage d'une potato d'un kernel 2.2 à un kernel 2.4
mais impossible de remettre la main dessus.
Dans mes bookmarks, j'ai ceci :
Bueno, principalmente te recomiendo que te pilles las lineas de ~bunk
para el sources.list (busca por ahí, en google por ejemplo, busca por
kernel 2.4.x potato ~bunk, ok?).
Cuando tengas esto (y hayas hecho update upgrade) verás con apt-cache
search ... que tienes varias imagenes de nucleos ya
Enzo Dari, miércoles 26 de septiembre de 2001 a la(s) 13:29:31 -0300:
Ojo: si uno actualiza modutils (hace falta para que un kernel
2.4.x con módulos ande bien) dejarán de funcionar los
kernels de la serie 2.2.x que utilicen módulos.
...
Esto es lo que dice la página de Bunk. Varios me han
Enzo Dari [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Enzo Dari, miércoles 26 de septiembre de 2001 a la(s) 13:29:31 -0300:
Ojo: si uno actualiza modutils (hace falta para que un kernel
2.4.x con módulos ande bien) dejarán de funcionar los
kernels de la serie 2.2.x que utilicen módulos.
...
Esto es
Enzo Dari, viernes 28 de septiembre de 2001 a la(s) 13:12:16 -0300:
Esto es lo que dice la página de Bunk. Varios me han aclarado
que tienen funcionando perfectamente el kernel 2.2.19 con
el último modutils. Probablemente sea porque el kernel 2.2.19
salió después del 2.4.0 y tal vez lo hayan
Bueno, parece que me había equivocado, sí valía la pena
mandarlo a la lista. Todavía quedan bastantes optimistas
que creen que pasar del kernel 2.2.19 al 2.4.x en Potato
es fácil.
El tema es que los kernel 2.4.x necesitan para funcionar
adecuadamente que se actualicen varios programas. Esta
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 01:29:31PM -0300, Enzo Dari wrote:
Bueno, parece que me había equivocado, sí valía la pena
mandarlo a la lista. Todavía quedan bastantes optimistas
que creen que pasar del kernel 2.2.19 al 2.4.x en Potato
es fácil...
les cuento como lo hice por si todavia quedan dudas
Enzo Dari, miércoles 26 de septiembre de 2001 a la(s) 13:29:31 -0300:
Ojo: si uno actualiza modutils (hace falta para que un kernel
2.4.x con módulos ande bien) dejarán de funcionar los
kernels de la serie 2.2.x que utilicen módulos.
Ein? Yo hace semanas que tengo
Tengo una ibook y en la estructura de bunk no tiene
soporte para ppc...
algun lugar en donde pueda bajarlo??
gracias..
--- Walter Osoria [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 01:29:31PM -0300, Enzo Dari
wrote:
Bueno, parece que me había equivocado, sí valía la
pena
mandarlo
A mi personal mento no me funciono lo tube que hase a mano : )
El Mar 25 Sep 2001 02:28, Akualo escribió:
Estoy tratando de actualizar mi kernel al 2.4 y decidí bajar los paquetes
de http://people.debian.org/~bunk/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/
se supone que instalando estos paquetes ya
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4 potato
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 09:27:18 -0300
From: Enzo Dari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Akualo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Akualo wrote:
Estoy tratando de actualizar
: SMTP; 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a
yahoo.com.mx account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - mta519.mail.yahoo.com
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 09:23:35 -0300
-
---
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4
Y yo aún recomiendo más el tar.bz2. es 2 MB más pequeño
y llega antes :)
Saludos
Miguel
Nicolas Fillon wrote:
Yo personal mente lo que te recomiendo es que bajes el tar-gz y que lo hagas
a mano es mas fasi.
Saludos : )
El Mar 25 Sep 2001 09:48, Enzo Dari escribió:
Hubiera
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 06:06:09PM +0200, Miguel Rodríguez Penabad wrote:
Y yo aún recomiendo más el tar.bz2. es 2 MB más pequeño
y llega antes :)
Saludos
Miguel
Nicolas Fillon wrote:
Y con el kernel-package puedes alcanzar el orgasmo ;-P
--
~ ~ ~ ~ ~\ Miguel
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 01:29:36AM -0400, Jason Boxman wrote:
I have a 486 firewall myself. My connectivity on other machines more or less
stops when I do things like run dpkg or the gShield firewall script
(iptables) loads on it. Is this normal, or is it just my particular 486 33?
dpkg
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 01:55:41PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
I have not found any reason to prefer make-kpkg over make bzImage and
Once you manage more than one machine, you will find reasons to prefer
kernel-package :)
--
Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better
Nathan E Norman wrote:
Once you manage more than one machine, you will find reasons to prefer
kernel-package :)
You mean, once I manage more than one machine that will run exactly the
same kernel. Right now, I have two Debian boxes, but one is a P3 running
Sid (kernel 2.4.9) and the other is
Craig Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Nelson wrote:
Why not just download the kernel-source package? Similar to the
vanilla ones, but usually with a few patches applied.
That's exactly why not. I'd rather have a vanilla Linus kernel source
tree to which I can apply patches
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:42:34PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
Nathan E Norman wrote:
Once you manage more than one machine, you will find reasons to prefer
kernel-package :)
You mean, once I manage more than one machine that will run exactly the
same kernel. Right now, I have two
On Sunday 09 September 2001 01:07 am, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:42:34PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
Nathan E Norman wrote:
snip
I maintain (more or less) four boxes ... a celeron (my home machine),
an athlon (my work desktop), a 486 (my firewall), and a p90 (a server
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:42:34PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
Nathan E Norman wrote:
Once you manage more than one machine, you will find reasons to prefer
kernel-package :)
You mean, once I manage more than one machine that will run exactly the
same
Brian Nelson wrote:
Yeah, those mysterious Debian developers do strange things to the
source. Whatever could it be?
Now you're just being snide, which doesn't exactly contribute to the
civility factor of the discussion. Fortunately, I have better sense than
to respond in kind.
The point is,
Am 08. Sep, 2001 schwäzte Rajesh Fowkar so:
What is this initrd ? Why it is required when kernel boots without it ?
It's required for the kernel-image-2.4.x packages because they're being
built with initrds. Actually, it's because the module for the filesystems
are in the initrds and not built
Am 08. Sep, 2001 schwäzte Craig Dickson so:
I have not found any reason to prefer make-kpkg over make bzImage and
manually installing the kernel image.
I've adminned many boxen with almost the same configuration. Also, my
firewall has no developer tools. kpkg actually doesn't help me much
On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 15:59, dman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 10:05:33AM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
| Yes, it's me again.
|
| Once this is sorted I'll stop bugging you, I promise!
|
| Does the kernel-image for 2.4.x from unstable come with devfsd on? I
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 01:29:36AM -0400, Jason Boxman wrote:
| On Sunday 09 September 2001 01:07 am, Nathan E Norman wrote:
| On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:42:34PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
| Nathan E Norman wrote:
| snip
|
| I maintain (more or less) four boxes ... a celeron (my home
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 12:46:36AM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote:
| Craig Dickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Brian Nelson wrote:
[...]
| I have not found any reason to prefer make-kpkg over make bzImage and
| manually installing the kernel image.
Just to be different :
| 1. You won't forget to
On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 15:59, dman wrote:
Add 'devfs=mount' to your kernel command line and try again. Use the
old-dev name for the root= argument though.
I'm getting there...
devfsd starts and hangs on Creating extra device nodes
Looking at the script:
for i in `sed -e '/^#/d' $DEVFILES
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 02:09:10AM -0700, der.hans wrote:
| Am 08. Sep, 2001 schw?zte Rajesh Fowkar so:
|
| What is this initrd ? Why it is required when kernel boots without it ?
|
| It's required for the kernel-image-2.4.x packages because they're being
| built with initrds. Actually, it's
On Saturday 08 September 2001 10:05 am, Ross Burton wrote:
Yes, it's me again.
Once this is sorted I'll stop bugging you, I promise!
Does the kernel-image for 2.4.x from unstable come with devfsd on? I
tried mounting a zip disk (external ppa) and the device was
/dev/scsi/0/... not
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 10:05:33AM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
| Yes, it's me again.
|
| Once this is sorted I'll stop bugging you, I promise!
|
| Does the kernel-image for 2.4.x from unstable come with devfsd on? I
^
devfsd and devfs
John Toon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 08 September 2001 10:05 am, Ross Burton wrote:
Personally I would always recommend downloading yourself a vanilla 2.4.x
kernel tarball from http://www.kernel.org. With kernels, this is one of the
few areas where I think it is better to use
Matt Jones saw fit to inform me that:
| Could you please explain straightforwardly, step by step how you
| compiled your kernel?
Make sure you enable initrd when you are doing the xconfig. It is not
something that stands out greatly and I missed it a few times. After
enabling the initrd I was
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 10:53:19PM +, Rajesh Fowkar wrote:
| Matt Jones saw fit to inform me that:
| | Could you please explain straightforwardly, step by step how you
| | compiled your kernel?
|
| Make sure you enable initrd when you are doing the xconfig. It is not
| something that stands
Am 08. Sep, 2001 schwäzte dman so:
If you compile your kernel without initrd support then you don't need
an initrd. The stock kernels need the initrd AFAIK. (Well, I didn't
get it to work without it)
We keep saying stock kernels. It should be pointed out that we mean the
kernel-image*
Brian Nelson wrote:
Why not just download the kernel-source package? Similar to the
vanilla ones, but usually with a few patches applied.
That's exactly why not. I'd rather have a vanilla Linus kernel source
tree to which I can apply patches without worrying about whether they'll
conflict
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 01:55:41PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
Brian Nelson wrote:
Why not just download the kernel-source package? Similar to the
vanilla ones, but usually with a few patches applied.
That's exactly why not. I'd rather have a vanilla Linus kernel source
tree to which I
On Saturday 08 September 2001 04:55 pm, Craig Dickson wrote:
Brian Nelson wrote:
snip
The package
installs the bzip2'ed source in /usr/src. Just tar -jxf it, configure
with 'make menuconfig' or whatever, and then build a custom
kernel-image package with 'make-kpkg kernel_image'.
I
Ross Burton [debian-user] 06/09/01 21:45 +0100:
Hi,
After noticing (thanks!) that kernel 2.4.x uses an initrd image I
managed to make it boot my Sid systems.
I wonder if you can help me.
In a previous post of mine I've detailed the problems I met in compiling kernel
2.4.9 but none told me
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 05:40:01PM +, Vittorio wrote:
| Ross Burton [debian-user] 06/09/01 21:45 +0100:
| Hi,
|
| After noticing (thanks!) that kernel 2.4.x uses an initrd image I
| managed to make it boot my Sid systems.
|
| I wonder if you can help me.
|
| In a previous post of mine
From: dman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user debian-user@lists.debian.org
CC: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.x woes
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:44:32 -0400
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 05:40:01PM +, Vittorio wrote:
| Ross Burton [debian-user] 06/09/01 21:45 +0100:
| Hi
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 09:45:37PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
| Hi,
|
| After noticing (thanks!) that kernel 2.4.x uses an initrd image I
| managed to make it boot my Sid systems.
|
| 1. Why does it wait for 5 seconds? (wait 5 seconds or press enter for a
| shell)?
No idea, but I'd like it if my
I know.
It is a personal workstation, and I am will fix the problem soon
--
Profanity is the one language all programmers know best.
Unknown
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Akintayo Holder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oren Gozlan wrote:
any info about kernel 2.4.x ?
any one have tried it ?
THNX
Yes, I tried it with testing and it messed up my modem config, it also does
not
allow my local filesystems to unmount at shutdown.
Note
Something that seems odd:
Documentation/Changes says to use gcc-2.91.66 but this old version isn't
available as a Debian package!
Quote:
Kernel compilation
==
GCC
---
The gcc version requirements may vary depending on the type of CPU in your
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 01:51:20PM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
|
| Something that seems odd:
|
| Documentation/Changes says to use gcc-2.91.66 but this old version isn't
| available as a Debian package!
Use 2.95. You shouldn't have any problems.
-D
Daniel Kleine-Albers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| i'm using it in conjunction with testing without _ANY_ problems
Also here. I've used 2.4.5, 2.4.7, 2.4.8, and 2.4.9 without problem on
a mostly testing system.
The only issue (as was pointed out to me here) is that 2.4.9 is really
designed to
people.debian.org/~bunk got great jobs for potato...
On 26 Aug 2001, Oren Gozlan wrote:
any info about kernel 2.4.x ?
any one have tried it ?
THNX
--
-
Oren Gozlan
Mobixell Networks Inc.
p: +972 9 776 0121
f: + 972 9 740 7373
c: +972 54 536 047
www.mobixell.com
Oren Gozlan wrote:
any info about kernel 2.4.x ?
any one have tried it ?
THNX
Yes, I tried it with testing and it messed up my modem config, it also does not
allow my local filesystems to unmount at shutdown.
--
Work is a function of results, not effort
Unknown
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Oren Gozlan wrote:
any info about kernel 2.4.x ?
any one have tried it ?
There is a ton of information on this in the archives. Also a couple
links from the debian site -
http://www.debian.org/News/2001/20010415
any info about kernel 2.4.x ?
any one have tried it ?
Yeah, it made my OnStream tape backup unusable.
Robert S. Koss, Ph.D. | Training and Mentoring
Senior Consultant | Object Oriented Design
Object Mentor, Inc. | C++, Java
www.objectmentor.com| Extreme Programming
On Sunday 26 August 2001 22:51, Oren Gozlan spoke wisely:
any info about kernel 2.4.x ?
any one have tried it ?
THNX
i'm using it in conjunction with testing without _ANY_ problems
--
Daniel Kleine-Albers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Oren Gozlan wrote:
| any info about kernel 2.4.x ?
| any one have tried it ?
I've got 2.4.8 on a testing system. It is the stock kernel that was
in sid a few weeks ago. It works great for me. devfs and USB is cool
too.
-D
Oren Gozlan saw fit to inform me that:
any info about kernel 2.4.x ?
any one have tried it ?
Yes. I am at present on kernel 2.4.9 :-) What u want to know ?
( I am working on this kernel at home ).
Warm Regards
--
On 26 Aug 2001 16:51:17 -0400, Oren Gozlan wrote:
** any info about kernel 2.4.x ?
** any one have tried it ?
I use kernel 2.4.x since 3 or 4 month, without any problems on potato.
There are some packeges to update, i taked from woody, to get a running
kernel 2.4.x. Modutils and ppp are
On Sunday 26 August 2001 01:51 pm, Oren Gozlan wrote:
any info about kernel 2.4.x ?
any one have tried it ?
Running 2.4.8 custom on sid right now. The stock kernel didn't work for me,
but the custom does. Works fine so far. I've been using the 2.4 series for a
while now and I haven't really
Subject: kernel 2.4.x
Date: Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 04:51:17PM -0400
In reply to:Oren Gozlan
Quoting Oren Gozlan([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
any info about kernel 2.4.x ?
any one have tried it ?
Running 2.4.9 on 3 Potato boxes and 1 Woody box. No parobems.
If you try a google search
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 07:11:25PM -0400, Bob Koss wrote:
took me two tries (forgot to include vfat the first time), but the
apt-get and make-kpkg utilities sure make this a lot easier than it
used to be in RedHat!
Sir, your language!!!
:-)
--
Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan
Wayne == Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, can I upgrade my kernel to 2.4.? Has anybody taken a newly
installed potato system and just upgraded the kernel to 2.4?
What headaches are in my future?
Wayne I changed 4 boxen to 2.4.x. No worries.
Wayne Add this to
Subject: kernel 2.4.x in potato?
Date: Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 09:53:12AM -0400
In reply to:Bob Koss
Quoting Bob Koss([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I'm still trying to get my OnStream tape driving working in Debian. I
was mistaken when I said that the driver was in the kernel. The driver
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 07:59:15PM -0400, dman wrote:
I've just spent some time on kernel.org and elsewhere, but I can't
find any FMs to R regarding the procedure to upgrade from kernel
2.2.19 to 2.4.x. Is an apt-get install enough (and point grub at the
new image of course)? Where can I
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 02:54:45AM +0200, Joost Kooij wrote:
| On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 07:59:15PM -0400, dman wrote:
| I've just spent some time on kernel.org and elsewhere, but I can't
| find any FMs to R regarding the procedure to upgrade from kernel
| 2.2.19 to 2.4.x. Is an apt-get install
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 09:34:34PM -0400, D-Man wrote:
| On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 02:54:45AM +0200, Joost Kooij wrote:
| | On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 07:59:15PM -0400, dman wrote:
| | I've just spent some time on kernel.org and elsewhere, but I can't
| | find any FMs to R regarding the procedure to
Subject: Re: kernel 2.4: where's the FM?
Date: Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 09:34:34PM -0400
In reply to:D-Man
Quoting D-Man([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I don't seem to have that on my system right now. Wouldn't that be a
part of the new package? How can I read the doc before I install
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Norbert Nemec wrote:
Hi there,
I've been using Kernel 2.4.x for quite a while now (2.4.4 at the moment) and
it
really works great, except for one last problem: At shutdown time, the
machine
complains that devfs can't be unmounted, because it is used (remounting ro
Dear Friends,
thank you very much indeed for all your valuable answers.
In this very moment on another console I'm just downloading the DEBs
of kernel 2.4.5 from Bunk stuff via apt-get dist-upgrade.
By the way, I didn't imagine to start that nice side-thread on the age
of Debian users which
On 09 Jul 2001, Wayne Topa wrote:
[snip]
I have been running the 2.4.x kernels since 2.4.2, currently have
2.4.6 under test. No problems at all on any of the 2.4.x series.
I have 2 other boxes running 2.4.5 but will upgrade then both in a
few days.
Don't know the oldest Linux user
Victor wrote:
Having a wonderfully stable debian 2.2r3 box with kernel 2.2.19
compiled tailored to my laptop's needs, I wonder if it is worth my
while upgrading to kernel 2.4.5.
My specific focus is on stability.
What's your experience on this?
Ciao
Vittorio
I've seen two or three
Thanks Charlie for your reply, and, by the way, I'm not that much
younger than you are (51) even though still in production :-)!
What I want (and I have now with kernel 2.2.19!) is a *STABLE* linux
laptop (a) to use also at work (b) to run hylafax as a server when it
is needed, (c) almost
Wow...I wish more older people were as tech savvy as you. I haven't been
able to get my mother at age 43 to even adapt to Windows9x.
I am using a vanilla Linux 2.4.5 kernel asides from making the necessary
updates on my potato distro. The good news is this. You can update
whatever distro you are
The following is an excerpt from a message I was going to post the day
before I decided to go ahead and make the leap anyway. ;-)
--
OK! Deb. You win.
Been used to doing things my way all my life and a lot of time's I'm
used to doing things other Linux ways.
Taking a good laugh at
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:56:20AM -0400, User zos wrote:
Wow...I wish more older people were as tech savvy as you. I haven't been
able to get my mother at age 43 to even adapt to Windows9x.
Just bide your time. At 40 my mom didn't touch the audio system as
she thought having to select the
Subject: Re: kernel 2.4.x: The Mother of all the questions
Date: Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:15:29AM -0500
In reply to:olgnuby
Quoting olgnuby([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Well, any way, it worked, and yes, like you, I maintain both kernels on
the install. Just in case. Don't like
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Mikael Gustaf Claesson wrote:
Jag har bestallt en ny notebook och jag tankte att jag skulle
ta och testa Debian. Men jag maste ha kernel 2.4 och jag vill
anvanda ReiserFS. Betyder det att jag maste installera fran
unstable? Och betyder det att allt kommer att krasha och
Potato (2.2) har gjorts kompatibel med kernel 2.4 så att modutils
är tillräckligt ny version osv.
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 08:47:47 Mikael Gustaf Claesson wrote:
Hej.
Jag har bestallt en ny notebook och jag tankte att jag skulle ta och
testa
Debian. Men jag maste ha kernel 2.4 och jag vill
Em Sun, 17 Jun 2001 17:46:22 -0300
marcio [EMAIL PROTECTED] Escreveu:
Olá pessoal,
Olá
se alguem puder me ajudar, gostaria de uma maozinha numa parada aqui !!
quando compilo o kernel 2.4.x
a placa de som funciona na boa !!
mas da pau no PPP
naum conecta mais !!
soh com o
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:04:00AM -0400, Jonathan D. Proulx uttered:
now I get init_module: No such device, all systems running
unstable. sndconfig doesn't seem to deal with 2.4 kernels (complains
about sound_core missing, I wonder if I can alias that away...)
Did you compile in Sound
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 12:50:41AM +1000, Steve Kowalik wrote:
:Did you compile in Sound Support as a module?
Yup, AFAIK sound_core.o is no longer used in 2.4. On the working
machine I don't see it.
re: where I compiled, one of the soundless systems was where I did the
build using make-kpkg.
* Jonathan D. Proulx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
Hi,
Sound, my personal blind spot...
When I upgraded to kernel 2.4.x some time ago I lost sound, and
haven't been able to get it back on two out of three machines.
We have a bunch of demos monday and it would be nice to put
10/06/2001 23:37:02, CrAkXeR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saludos.
Hola, utilizo la potato 2.2r2 y he recompilado el kernel al 2.4.5, tengo
una conexión PPP (tarifa plana de eresmas) de lo más normalita, resulta
que con el kernel 2.2.18 va todo bien y con $pon eresmas me conecto,
cuando compilo
On 10 Jun 2001 23:37:02 +0200, CrAkXeR wrote:
Hola, utilizo la potato 2.2r2 y he recompilado el kernel al 2.4.5, tengo
una conexión PPP (tarifa plana de eresmas) de lo más normalita, resulta
que con el kernel 2.2.18 va todo bien y con $pon eresmas me conecto,
cuando compilo kernel 2.4.5 en
algién me diera alguna sugerencia sobre lo k me puede pasar, muchas
gracias.
Actualiza pppd a 2.4 que esta en woody o mira la pagina de potato en
debian que habia un enlace para bajar los paquetes que no van bien con 2.4
en potato
SaludeTes de Marcelino aka flip
03/05/2001 14:34:08, Fernández Piqueras, Joaquín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
¿Has probado con el 2.4.3? Yo también tengo un K7 y con ese núcleo no me da
ningún problema. Cierto es,
de todas formas, que tampoco me lo dio con el 2.4.1 ni el 2.4.0 (aunque sí con
el 2.3.XX).
--
Imobach González Sosa
Webmaster - TallerLinux dijo:
Amigos:
Alguno de Uds. tiene o conoce un buen Howto de cómo compilar la última
versión del Kernel 2.4.x. Necesito encontrar alguno, para publicarlo en mi
sitio. Les agradeceré que me digan alguna dirección en donde hallar uno
(idealmente en español).
Se
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 07:45:01PM +0200, Matthias Mann wrote:
I had found a bug that is in kernel-2.4.1 and kernel-2.4.2.
I've been using 2.4.2-ac13, 2.4.2-ac28 and pretty much everything
in between on my Duron box. You might want to try a recent -ac.
Regards
Christian
I have been told that the loopback for 2.4.2 is broken.. but not sure and
the later ac patch so fixed that
Edwin Lau
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:43:28 Andrash Kovach wrote:
Hello guys!
I've compiled the kernel source 2.4.2 with loopback device support
have run with potato install.
When I
VALEWS
Fernando Fraga e Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Em Sab 17 Fev 2001 01:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
O erro que vc. pegou é de programação e em parte do código estável , i.e.,
uma parte básica do kernel. Sugestão : vá a http://www.kernel.org e pegue
kernel 2.4.1 que já está
Em Sab 17 Fev 2001 01:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
O erro que vc. pegou é de programação e em parte do código estável , i.e.,
uma parte básica do kernel. Sugestão : vá a http://www.kernel.org e pegue
kernel 2.4.1 que já está em release.
O erro é a falta de declaração da variável current,
o erro foi o senguinte :
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/interrupt.h: In function `tasklet_hi_schedule':
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/interrupt.h:174: `current' undeclared (first use in
this function)
In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/string.h:21,
from
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 04:12:19PM +0100, Bostjan Muller wrote:
Hi!
I have just found out that latin2 (iso8859-2) characters are no longer
displayed in console with kernel 2.4.1 :(((
This is my setup:
snip cat /etc/console-tools/config
SCREEN_FONT=lat2u-16
APP_CHARSET_MAP=iso02
Blz ... só que agora estou usando ruindows e vou ficar a semana toda sem net
por motivo de trabalho ... passo o erro no próximo final de senama .
Valews
Alexandre Pereira da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Mande a saida do gcc ou do programa que esta dando erro.
Em Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at
201 - 300 of 334 matches
Mail list logo
