On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Tom Hoover wrote:
> Is there any advantage to building the kernel outside of fakeroot?
The fakeroot man page says quite clearly that "Thou shall never configure a
anything under fakeroot", so I try to only do the install targets under
fakeroot to avoid hard-to-track problems.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 06:57:48PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
>
> I don't know. What I could suggest you to do is this:
>
> make-kpkg --revision... build
> fakeroot make -f debian/rules kernel-image-deb
> fakeroot make-kpkg modules_image
>
> The above sequence has never failed me. It buil
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:11:23PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> > > Am I misreading the docs?
> > I don't know. What I could suggest you to do is this:
>
> Well, now I know. The make-kpkg man page makes it very clear that the only
> target
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> > Am I misreading the docs?
> I don't know. What I could suggest you to do is this:
Well, now I know. The make-kpkg man page makes it very clear that the only
target which knows how to deal with rootcmd is buildpackage. I never use it,
though. I
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Tom Hoover wrote:
> I've successfully built a new kernel package with make-kpkg, but only if I
> use:
>
> fakeroot -- make-kpkg --revision=custom.X.XX. kernel_image
I'll usually run fakeroot make-kpkg ... I've never needed that --
> Am I misreading the docs?
5 matches
Mail list logo
