Re: Sarge Performance

2005-05-25 Thread Joris Huizer
Lars Roland wrote: So now the load looks ok, still the old Redhat is holding its head above but now it is only with 10%. This may be due to further bugs in the tg3 driver that hopefully a new kernel will fix - if not then I must fill a bug report and send it to the driver developers, it can not

Re: Sarge Performance

2005-05-22 Thread Lars Roland
On 5/21/05, Lars Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > I just replaced my company anti-virus/anti-spam mail gateway from a > Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.24 to Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8.1. I > had hoped that this transition would lead to better performance (new > perl, better drivers i

Re: Sarge Performance

2005-05-22 Thread Kevin Mark
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 05:06:47PM +0200, Lars Roland wrote: > Hi all > > I just replaced my company anti-virus/anti-spam mail gateway from a > Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.24 to Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8.1. I > had hoped that this transition would lead to better performance (new > perl, better

Re: Sarge Performance

2005-05-21 Thread Rogério Brito
On May 22 2005, Lars Roland wrote: > I have doubled checked these numbers and they are true (perhaps Perl > 5.8 is much faster than the old version 5.6 on Redhat) - note that > most people has performance problems with spamassassin because they > have crappy DNS perfoamnce, I use a dedicated DNS s

Re: Sarge Performance

2005-05-21 Thread Lars Roland
On 5/21/05, Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Lars Roland: > > > > I just replaced my company anti-virus/anti-spam mail gateway from a > > Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.24 to Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8.1. I > > had hoped that this transition would lead to better performance (new > > per

Re: Sarge Performance

2005-05-21 Thread Jochen Schulz
* Lars Roland: > > I just replaced my company anti-virus/anti-spam mail gateway from a > Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.24 to Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8.1. I > had hoped that this transition would lead to better performance (new > perl, better drivers in the kernel and so on) but the performance ha

Re: Sarge Performance

2005-05-21 Thread Lars Roland
On 5/21/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not sure. It appears that you have covered your bases pretty > well in terms figuring out where the bottleneck might be. I > would recommend reposting on debian-isp, since there are likely > people there that are more accustomed to de

Re: Sarge Performance

2005-05-21 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Lars Roland wrote: > Hi all > > I just replaced my company anti-virus/anti-spam mail gateway from a > Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.24 to Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8.1. I > had hoped that this transition would lead to better performance (new > perl, better drivers in the kernel and so on) but the