Quoting Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:41:38AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > Quoting Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Are the Debian 2.2.20 images absolutely vanilla kernels? So what I'd
> > get from a Debian mirror is identical to what I'd get from
> > ww
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 04:42:38PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> No, they're not. Well, the 2.4 ones aren't, at least. Debian needs to
> supply (at least) the patches *somewhere* to comply with the GPL.
apt-get source kernel-source-$KVERS should get you
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:41:38AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> Quoting Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Are the Debian 2.2.20 images absolutely vanilla kernels? So what I'd
> get from a Debian mirror is identical to what I'd get from
> www.kernel.org?
No, they're not. Well, the 2.4 o
"Jeffrey L. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:51:14AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
>> > I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20
>> > kernel?
>>
>> kernel-source-2.2.20
Quoting Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 12:47:28AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:51:14AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > > I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20
> > > kernel?
> >
> > kernel-source-2.2.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 12:47:28AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:51:14AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20
> > kernel?
>
> kernel-source-2.2.20 if it's still actually in the distribution; it's
> pre
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 02:47:41 -0800
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First, I'm surprised that stable's still shipping with 2.2. Christ,
> folks, it's 2003, let's catch up stable.
>
> Second, you can't stop time. And as long as software's in widespread
> use, it's likely actively deve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 04:14:50AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> jump to the latest 2.2.x. That's supposed to be one of the great
> selling points for Linux and Debian, no forced obsolescence. You
> saying that's a lie?
First, I'm surprised that
Quoting Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:51:14AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20
> > kernel?
>
> kernel-source-2.2.20 if it's still actually in the distribution; it's
> pretty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:51:14AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20
> kernel?
kernel-source-2.2.20 if it's still actually in the distribution; it's
pretty ancient so it may be go
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 21:25, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> Quoting Jeffrey L. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > isn't apt a good alternative to find that out?
> > >
> >
> > Sound very reasonable, but:
> >
> > ~# apt-cache policy kernel-sourc
Quoting Jeffrey L. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > isn't apt a good alternative to find that out?
> >
>
> Sound very reasonable, but:
>
> ~# apt-cache policy kernel-source-2.2.20
> kernel-source-2.2.20:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: (n
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> isn't apt a good alternative to find that out?
>
Sound very reasonable, but:
~# apt-cache policy kernel-source-2.2.20
kernel-source-2.2.20:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: (none)
Version Table:
What mirror(s) are you using?
Jeffrey
--
T
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20
> kernel? That's what comes as the default in woody and I want to tweak
> it. I can find headers, patches (what good are patches w/out source
> to patch?), ReiserFS and PCMCIA mo
isn't apt a good alternative to find that out?
web:~# apt-cache search kernel-source
freeswan - IPSEC utilities for FreeSWan
kernel-patch-2.2-lids - LIDS Kernel Patch
kernel-patch-2.4-lids - LIDS Kernel Patch
kernel-source-2.2.20 - Linux kernel source for version 2.2.20
^^
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:51:14AM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> I'm missing something. What is the name of the source for the 2.2.20
> kernel? That's what comes as the default in woody and I want to tweak
> it. I can find headers, patches (what good are patches w/out source
> to patch?), Re
16 matches
Mail list logo