On Sunday 21 February 2010 20:17:56 Gonzalo Gorosito wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I just installed the apt-proxy and I can't get it working. Using the config
> file as it comes here's my log file:
[ Good stuff snipped... ]
> Any clue?
I recently switched to "approx" from apt-proxy for this sort
of
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:03:39 -0400, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:14:54 +0200
> Gilles Mocellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Le Friday 25 July 2008 18:34:17 Peter Daum, vous avez écrit :
>> > I am trying to get apt-proxy to work on a test machine running
>> > lenny
Celejar wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:14:54 +0200
Gilles Mocellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Friday 25 July 2008 18:34:17 Peter Daum, vous avez écrit :
I am trying to get apt-proxy to work on a test machine running lenny.
[...]
Generally, apt-proxy doesn't really look overly trustworthy
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:14:54 +0200
Gilles Mocellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Friday 25 July 2008 18:34:17 Peter Daum, vous avez écrit :
> > I am trying to get apt-proxy to work on a test machine running lenny.
> [...]
>
> > Generally, apt-proxy doesn't really look overly trustworthy (on
> >
Le Friday 25 July 2008 18:34:17 Peter Daum, vous avez écrit :
> I am trying to get apt-proxy to work on a test machine running lenny.
[...]
> Generally, apt-proxy doesn't really look overly trustworthy (on
> every start there is a python warning about telnet being deprecated),
> but there doesn't
Rodrigo Castro([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I'm experiencing trouble to put apt-proxy to work. In the
> apt-proxy-v2.confI didn't change many things, only the server Ip (like
> 192.168.1.11) and the backends. And the client's source.list would be like
> deb http://192.168.1.11:999
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 02:11, Rodrigo Castro wrote:
> After apt-proxy --config-file=/etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf the output
> would stop. But when I apt-get update the client fails to connect and I
> get:
I really don't know. The message below all look like regular messages, I
really do
After apt-proxy --config-file=/etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf the output would stop. But when I apt-get update the client fails to connect and I get:apt-proxy --config-file=/etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/manhole/telnet.py:8: DeprecationWarning: As of Twist
On Monday 13 November 2006 04:00, Rodrigo Castro wrote:
> I changed the port, now when I enter
> apt-proxy --config-file=/etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf
> I get this output and it stops there:
That looks right...does it still not respond on the configured port?
j
>
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-pac
I changed the port, now when I enter apt-proxy --config-file=/etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.confI get this output and it stops there:/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/manhole/telnet.py:8: DeprecationWarning: As of Twisted
2.1, twisted.protocols.telnet is deprecated. See twisted.conch.telnet f
Didn't see that, my mistake. Thank you all.On 11/10/06, Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 10 November 2006 11:29, Rodrigo Castro wrote:> 2006/11/10 18:24 BRST [-]
twisted.internet.error.CannotListenError:> Couldn't listen on 192.168.1.11: : (98, 'Address already in use').Th
On Friday 10 November 2006 11:29, Rodrigo Castro wrote:
> 2006/11/10 18:24 BRST [-] twisted.internet.error.CannotListenError:
> Couldn't listen on 192.168.1.11: : (98, 'Address already in use').
There is your problem right there: there is already a program listening on
port , so it couldn
-> Client errorsapt-get updateErr http://192.168.1.11 testing Release.gpg Connection failedIgn http://192.168.1.11 testing Release
Ign http://192.168.1.11 testing/main PackagesErr http://192.168.1.11 testing/main Packages Connection failedFailed to fetch
http://192.168.1.11:/debian/dists/tes
On Friday 10 November 2006 10:58, Rodrigo Castro wrote:
> I'm experiencing trouble to put apt-proxy to work. In the
> apt-proxy-v2.confI didn't change many things, only the server Ip (like
> 192.168.1.11) and the backends. And the client's source.list would be like
> deb http://192.168.1.11:/de
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:47:26AM -0300, Gilberto Martins wrote:
> WOW!!!
>
> It did worked out. But, why this weird problem with FTP backends ?
> Thanks
>
>
Could be a bug. The %7e is a URL encoding, which is often used to
encose special characters in URLs, so that the browser and server don
WOW!!!It did worked out. But, why this weird problem with FTP backends ?Thanks
Have you tried switching to an HTTP backend?Regards,-Roberto
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 04:12:22AM -0300, Gilberto Martins wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am using apt-proxy to provide a Debian mirror to my network.
> This afternoon, I tried to install kde, by typeing "apt-get install kde" in
> a client. It almost worked, but it stucked.
> After searching among many log fi
#include
* Johan Daine [Sat, Mar 04 2006, 08:18:47AM]:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am making some tests with apt-proxy.
> apt-proxy is working perfectly. I have been purging gpm, removing the
> 2006/03/04 08:16 CET [-] [apt_pkg] No Packages files available for
> security backend
> 2006/03/04 08:16 CET [
Thank you - that solved that problem. Can you tell me why?
Also - when I try to stop the proxy server, I have to issue the
"/etc/init.d/apt-proxy stop" command twice.
Daniel
Toshiro wrote:
Add this to /etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf:
disable_pipelining=1
Regards,
Toshiro.
El Lun 27 Sep 2004 02:
Add this to /etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf:
disable_pipelining=1
Regards,
Toshiro.
El Lun 27 Sep 2004 02:58, Daniel L. Miller escribió:
> I recently upgraded to apt-proxy v2 on our gateway - and now all of my
> apt clients (including the server, since the sources file references the
> proxy) a
Bengt Thuree wrote:
Hope someone can enlighten me to the status and future of apt-proxy.
Found some information on the web.
http://www.webservertalk.com/message222715.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Rob Weir]
> apt-proxy is a shell script, and thus cannot run as a daemon.
Well, you could hack something together with netcat, but that has about
as much point as using a screwdriver as a chisel. inetd is the right
tool for the job.
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 02:05:14PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen said
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Rob Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 6:54 AM
> >Subject: Re: apt-proxy without i
>- Original Message -
>From: "Rob Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 6:54 AM
>Subject: Re: apt-proxy without inetd
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to run apt-proxy without inetd?
> I'm not us
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 04:34:48PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen said
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to run apt-proxy without inetd?
> I'm not using inetd or xinetd and would like to keep it that way.
Why? Just install it and disable everything aside from apt-proxy.
--
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | [EMA
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 10:00, Thomas Gebhardt wrote:
> I have not noticed any release of the python apt-proxy v2 yet.
> Apart from the mentioned flaw I'm very satisfied with apt-proxy
> which helps to save a lot of bandwith. So I'd rather stay with
> apt-proxy if I would have the hope that the probl
wjl wrote:
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Try getting the box that runs the proxy working first before you
try the remote boxes.
Hi Roberto,
after setting it to 5 Minutes (you saw that), and after waiting for another
day (in fact it was over night) all of a sudden it works automagically. Now
I'm back
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Try getting the box that runs the proxy working first before you
> try the remote boxes.
Hi Roberto,
after setting it to 5 Minutes (you saw that), and after waiting for another
day (in fact it was over night) all of a sudden it works automagically. Now
I'm back to 60 Min
wjl wrote:
Ok; my /etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy.conf looks like:
I can't see anything specifically wrong. Here is my apt-proxy.conf:
add_backend /main/ \
$APT_PROXY_CACHE/debian/\
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Please post the contents of your /etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy.conf (as I
> asked in the previous message) and also post a listing of the output
> for a failed session (and a successful one if you can manage it).
>
> -Roberto
Ok; my /etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy.conf looks like:
wjl wrote:
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
[Tips for apt-proxy]
Hmmm Roberto,
I checked all this, tho I couldn't believe that the problem would lay there,
since the clients do get the package list and everything just fine *the
first time*. Also installing new packages, even ones the proxy doesn't
have,
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> [Tips for apt-proxy]
Hmmm Roberto,
I checked all this, tho I couldn't believe that the problem would lay there,
since the clients do get the package list and everything just fine *the
first time*. Also installing new packages, even ones the proxy doesn't
have, work like
wjl wrote:
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
BACKEND_FREQ=240
Check to make sure you do not have this set too high. I.e., mine is set
at 4 hours, to after an update by any client, the server won't refresh
the archive for 4 hours. If your is set really high, that may be the
cause of the problem.
-Roberto
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> BACKEND_FREQ=240
>
> Check to make sure you do not have this set too high. I.e., mine is set
> at 4 hours, to after an update by any client, the server won't refresh
> the archive for 4 hours. If your is set really high, that may be the
> cause of the problem.
>
> -Rob
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> # Maximum frequency of Packages/etc. updates from back end (minutes)
> # Keep high to speed things up.
> BACKEND_FREQ=240
Aaah, this is it - thanks Roberto ;-)
wjl
--
NTV '94 RedSue 24-41Mm running on fuel; everything else runs Debian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
Hi group (or list & group),
I use apt-proxy on unstable here, and the clients use it just fine - *the
first time*.
The next morning, they see no new packages on the proxy machine, even not
after updating/upgrading the proxy, not after apt-proxy-import, not after
setiing the
on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:59:20PM +1000, Jimi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am looking for an apt-proxy like program that can download packages
> when told not when a client requests them. However, it could record
> requests being made to download at a later date, and then once
> downloaded, serv
Tom - I hope you don't mind me posting your reply back to the list.
[ and then of course I forget to send it to the list anyway. Sorry Tom.
Hopefully forwarding it from my Sent folder works ...]
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 06:53:35AM -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
> Richard Hector wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
>
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:08:56PM +0200, Frank Langanke wrote:
> This works for apt-get, how do I enable such a login-procedure for
> apt-proxy ? I tried to set the http_proxy and ftp_proxy variables like
> ftp_proxy=ftp://firewall_user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/, but
> with no success.
apt-proxy just us
On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 23:40:12 +0200, Frank Langanke wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'd like to install several Debian-Boxes behind our company's firewall.
> However for every http- or ftp-access to the internet I've to
> authenticate. I got apt-get going with the following configuration,
> taken from the apt.co
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 09:37:26AM +0100, Chris Halls wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:24:09PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> > Is /var/cache/apt-proxy self contained? If I back up that directory,
> > together with /etc/apt-proxy, can I then just reinstall apt-proxy
> > and unpa
Hi Richard,
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:24:09PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> Is /var/cache/apt-proxy self contained? If I back up that directory,
> together with /etc/apt-proxy, can I then just reinstall apt-proxy
> and unpack those 2 to be back where I was? Or are there some indexes
> or somethi
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:54:08AM -0400, Jason Bleazard wrote:
> I've recently started using apt-proxy, and today discovered that I
> apparently don't have the settings quite right for security. The other
> settings all have been okay so far, so apt-proxy does work for me.
> Also, apt-get update
Andrea Balzi wrote:
Hi,
I have installed a PC in a LAN where is not web-proxy without problems.
After I put the PC in to a LAn with a web-proxy (squid), I've create
the apt.conf file in to /etc/apt directory with the following line:
Acquire::http::Proxy "10.0.0.169:1428"
try:
Acquire::h
Chris Halls wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 01:22:12PM -0700, Paul Scott,,, wrote:
When I run apt-get update on the other machine I get 111 connection refused.
Do I need something in /etc/exports or /etc/hosts.allow?
A quote from the README:
Thanks. I had forgotten about this README
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 01:22:12PM -0700, Paul Scott,,, wrote:
> When I run apt-get update on the other machine I get 111 connection refused.
>
> Do I need something in /etc/exports or /etc/hosts.allow?
A quote from the README:
Q: A connection cannot be established with apt-proxy on a remote mac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 03:08:39PM +0200, Andrea Balzi wrote:
> When I tried launch "apt-get install " but did not contact the
> proxy for the demands.
> Have mistaken I something?
Yes. Edit /etc/environment.
Mine looks like this (for example...)
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:09:26PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> squid cache server is easier for me to set up.
Then use it ;-) If you've already got Squid set up nicely, then obviously
it is less effort to point Apt at Squid than to install apt-proxy.
apt-proxy is quite different to Squid, because
Hi Ross
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:25:52PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> I am trying to use apt-proxy at home so that I can share debs between my
> desktop and laptop. However, when I run "dselect update" with my
> sources.list pointing at the proxy (which points at the UK mirrors), I
> get a list
FYI:
squid cache server is easier for me to set up.
More generic and no need to reconfigure even if you fetch from other
sources.
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:25:52PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use apt-proxy at home so that I can share debs between my
> desktop and laptop
On Fri, 11 May 2001 09:04:16 John R Lenton wrote:
> apt-get install apt-proxy
Yeah, but it's a pain to configure. You have to find rsync-enabled apt
sources for it and it has a tendency to time out a lot. We tried using it
for a while in work (about 10 debian machines all using apt-proxy) and it
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 07:43:49AM +, Richard Skinner wrote:
> I've been searching for info on how to do this for a couple
> of days, but now it's time to beg for help...
>
> I use a Debian box at home which I regularly update from
> the 'unstable' archive on ftp.debian.org - at the moment
I guess you'll have to try apt-proxy...
Ron Rademaker
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Gregory Cascante wrote:
>
>
>
> I have problems with APT, I can't download the files.
> I know that the problem is that I use a proxY SEVER for
> HTTP an FTP.
>
> HOW can I configure APT for the Proxy?
>
> Thanks
Here's what I have:
export http_proxy="http://proxy.rnd-consulting.com:3128";
export gopher_proxy="http://proxy.rnd-consulting.com:3128";
export ftp_proxy="http://proxy.rnd-consulting.com:3128";
Thus spake Gregory Cascante ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>
>
> I have problems with APT, I can't dow
54 matches
Mail list logo
