On 7 June 2011 14:35, Erwan David wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 07:46:01AM CEST, wolf python london
> said:
>> On 24 May 2011 23:26, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Mihira Fernando
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 05/24/2011 08:48 PM, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 07:46:01AM CEST, wolf python london
said:
> On 24 May 2011 23:26, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Mihira Fernando
> > wrote:
> >> On 05/24/2011 08:48 PM, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi, everyone
> >>>
> >>> If the CPU core is i5, what pac
On 24 May 2011 23:26, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Mihira Fernando
> wrote:
>> On 05/24/2011 08:48 PM, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, everyone
>>>
>>> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
>>> My old PC (Pentium-D core) is using i386
On Mon, 30 May 2011 19:57:39 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 15:21:37 -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530
> > Mihira Fernando wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> Adobe flashplayer comes to mind as well. While there is a 64 bit
> >> player, I've found that
On Mon, 30 May 2011 16:38:19 -0400
Doug wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 03:21 PM, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530
> > Mihira Fernando wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> Adobe flashplayer comes to mind as well. While there is a 64 bit player,
> >> I've found that the 32bit one plays without
Why don't get miro? ;-)
On 05/30/11 at 04:38pm, Doug wrote:
> Using pclos; installed youtube-dl (which you refer to) and youtube-download.
> Both are scripts. I searched the youtube-dl for "clive" and found nothing,
> nor did I find usage, altho it might be there--this is a very large script.
> The youtube-download (perh
On 05/30/2011 03:21 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530
Mihira Fernando wrote:
...
Adobe flashplayer comes to mind as well. While there is a 64 bit player,
I've found that the 32bit one plays without any hiccups that the 64bit
one seems to have (No need to have flash is evil
Shouldn't the subject be "AMD64 and i386"?
On 30/05/11 03:57 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2011 15:21:37 -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530
Mihira Fernando wrote:
Adobe flashplayer comes to mind as well. While there is a 64 bit
player, I've found that the 32bit on
On Mon, 30 May 2011 15:21:37 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530
> Mihira Fernando wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> Adobe flashplayer comes to mind as well. While there is a 64 bit
>> player, I've found that the 32bit one plays without any hiccups that
>> the 64bit one seems to have (
On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530
Mihira Fernando wrote:
...
> Adobe flashplayer comes to mind as well. While there is a 64 bit player,
> I've found that the 32bit one plays without any hiccups that the 64bit
> one seems to have (No need to have flash is evil debates here. Some of
> us wants
Jeroen van Aart (jer...@mompl.net on 2011-05-24 13:39 -0700):
> Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > amd64 is possible. Since from amd64 you can still run x86 code ...
> > but not the other way around. Is there a drawback when installing
> > an amd64 kernel ?
>
> 32 bits is likely to play more video codec
> with the capacity of lscpu i obtain :
Hi,
Try;
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
Regards,
Burhan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTimGoyOKxc0TDrLXY8sewFi1s
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
amd64 is possible. Since from amd64 you can still run x86 code ... but
not the other way around. Is there a drawback when installing an amd64
kernel ?
32 bits is likely to play more video codecs than 64 bits, by virtue of
the w64codecs package lacking a bit. And to the
Le Wed, 25 May 2011 00:18:01 +0900,
"J.Hwan.Kim" a écrit :
> Hi, everyone
>
> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
> My old PC (Pentium-D core) is using i386 package.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best Regards
> J.Hwan Kim
>
>
helllo,
how do you KNPOW THAT IT
Hi Miles,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:39:04AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Tom Grace wrote:
> > On 24/05/11 16:18, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
> >
> >> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
> >>
> > You should be able to choose between amd64 and i386. Depending on wha
On Tue, 24 May 2011 21:14:38 +0530, Mihira Fernando wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 May 2011 17:26:36 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>> Actually I never understood why people would want to install i386 when
>>> amd64 is possible. Since from amd64 you can still run x86 code ... but
>>> not th
On Tue, 24 May 2011 17:26:36 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
(...)
Actually I never understood why people would want to install i386 when
amd64 is possible. Since from amd64 you can still run x86 code ... but
not the other way around. Is there a drawback when installing an amd64
kernel ?
Ha! :
On Tue, 24 May 2011 17:26:36 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
(...)
> Actually I never understood why people would want to install i386 when
> amd64 is possible. Since from amd64 you can still run x86 code ... but
> not the other way around. Is there a drawback when installing an amd64
> kernel ?
Tom Grace wrote:
> On 24/05/11 16:18, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
>
>> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
>>
> You should be able to choose between amd64 and i386. Depending on what
> you want to use the system for, i386 may suit you better than amd64.
> ia64 is a d
2011/5/24 J.Hwan.Kim
> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
>
Better to go with amd64 :-)
i386 is old albeit still runs on new computers.
ia64 is not compatible with Core i5!
> My old PC (Pentium-D core) is using i386 package.
>
I think it could be already usi
Hi,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:18:01AM +0900, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
You should use amd64 :-)
i386 is the 32-bit version -- you can use it, but it won't use all
features of your system (e.g: no single program can
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Mihira Fernando wrote:
> On 05/24/2011 08:48 PM, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
>>
>> Hi, everyone
>>
>> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
>> My old PC (Pentium-D core) is using i386 package.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> J.
2011/5/24 J.Hwan.Kim :
> Hi, everyone
>
> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
> My old PC (Pentium-D core) is using i386 package.
>
Hi,
ia64 is not the correct architecture for i5.
You can install i386. But if you want to take advantage of 64 bit,
then you shoul
On Wed, 25 May 2011 00:18:01 +0900, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
I'm afraid you can't install ia64 >:-)
It's amd64 or i386, choose your poison (BTW, I would go for amd64).
> My old PC (Pentium-D core) is using i386 package.
Generall
On 05/24/2011 08:48 PM, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
Hi, everyone
If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
My old PC (Pentium-D core) is using i386 package.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
J.Hwan Kim
use amd64 if you want 64bit computing or i386 if you want to stick with
On 24/05/11 16:18, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
> If the CPU core is i5, what package should be installed ia64 or i386?
You should be able to choose between amd64 and i386. Depending on what
you want to use the system for, i386 may suit you better than amd64.
ia64 is a different thing and won't work on the i5
27 matches
Mail list logo
