On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 11:19:07AM -0800, Paul Nathan Puri wrote:
I recently upgraded to potato.
Now X starts and immediately dies. Why would this be?
This is (probably) a known bug in -9. Upgrade to -10.
What are the minimum packages
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 06:31:35PM -0600, Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
hi
why -10 insists on having tons of stuff installed i really
don't use?
like xfs, or rstart(d), or twm (is there any person alive who
uses twm?), or xmh, or xterm, or...
It doesn't. Read the extended description of the
Paul Nathan Puri [EMAIL PROTECTED]@office.law-counsellor.com writes:
I recently upgraded to potato.
Now X starts and immediately dies. Why would this be? What are the
minimum packages necessary to run X under potato (or in general)?
It would probably be because the X maintainer left a
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Daniel Martin wrote:
Paul Nathan Puri [EMAIL PROTECTED]@office.law-counsellor.com
writes:
[...] What are the
minimum packages necessary to run X under potato (or in general)?
[snipped: useful answer by Daniel to the Potato X problem]
I'd like to know the answer to the
In a message dated 2/8/99 1:13:54 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to know the answer to the question: What is a minimal set
of packages necessary to run X?
I'd say (for hamm) xbase, xserver-svga (or other depending on your card),
xserver-vga16, and xfnts75 at
On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 11:19:07AM -0800, Paul Nathan Puri wrote:
I recently upgraded to potato.
Now X starts and immediately dies. Why would this be?
This is (probably) a known bug in -9. Upgrade to -10.
What are the minimum packages necessary to run X under potato (or in general)?
6 matches
Mail list logo