john doe wrote:
I don't have that file, not even /etc/X11/xdm directory. Do I really
need to install xdm package to adjust it? I thought we are talking
about gdm here.
-jd
On 6/12/05, B. L. Jilek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
john doe wrote:
I did a standard installation, somehow the font on g
john doe:
>
> I did a standard installation, somehow the font on gdm login screen is
> so small it's almost unrecognizable. But once I login, all the fonts
> are in reasonable sizes. Anyone else has a similar problem? I searched
> around and couldn't find any answer. The gdm.conf file never
> expli
I don't have that file, not even /etc/X11/xdm directory. Do I really
need to install xdm package to adjust it? I thought we are talking
about gdm here.
-jd
On 6/12/05, B. L. Jilek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> john doe wrote:
> > I did a standard installation, somehow the font on gdm login screen
john doe wrote:
> I did a standard installation, somehow the font on gdm login screen is
> so small it's almost unrecognizable. But once I login, all the fonts
> are in reasonable sizes. Anyone else has a similar problem? I searched
> around and couldn't find any answer. The gdm.conf file never
> e
I am forwarding this to debian-boot and setting MFT, as it is more
appropriate there.
-Roberto
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 07:19:33PM +0100, debian wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have a Tyan Thunder K8W board
> (http://www.tyan.com/products/html/thunderk8w_spec.html)
> with a single opteron 246 as I remem
On Jun 11 2005, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 11:15:32AM +0200, Jonathan Kaye wrote:
> > Like many others on this list I am tracking "testing" which is now Etch
> > rather than Sarge. It would be nice to receive regular reports on how
> > the transition is going.
>
> Good to hea
En/La Maurits van Rees ha escrit, a 11/06/05 16:16:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 11:15:32AM +0200, Jonathan Kaye wrote:
>
>>I'm happy to report
>>that as of 11:00 CEST I have had no problems whatsoever.
>
>
> Good to hear.
>
>
>>It would be a great service if anyone encountering problems write t
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 11:15:32AM +0200, Jonathan Kaye wrote:
> Like many others on this list I am tracking "testing" which is now Etch
> rather than Sarge. It would be nice to receive regular reports on how
> the transition is going. Obviously this depends on what packages are
> installed and bei
According to Roberto C. Sanchez,
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 11:48:26PM +0100, Chris Robinson wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I think Sarge is super, but can anyone tell me where to find out whats on
> > disks
> > 1-14?
> >
> > I have been using Debian for about 2 years, but have not been able to
> > figu
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 11:48:26PM +0100, Chris Robinson wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think Sarge is super, but can anyone tell me where to find out whats on
> disks
> 1-14?
>
> I have been using Debian for about 2 years, but have not been able to figure
> out what is on the disks.
>
Stuff.
You more t
On 6/9/05, Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Footnote: I may be having the same problem at home, too (similarly
> sarge 2.6.11, albeit PS2 mouse this time). However I can't confirm
> that, I haven't used that machine much recently and I think the mouse
> actually was physically unplugged a
I forgot to mention that it also says...
"If you installed other than from a CD or DVD (for example, netboot, or
booting from floppy and installing the base system from the network),
you are not affected by this bug."
Christopher
Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 03:54 pm,
The note says
"If you have already installed a system using a 3.1r0 CD/DVD image, you
do not need to reinstall. Instead, simply edit /etc/apt/sources.list,
look for any lines mentioning security.debian.org, change "testing" to
"stable", and remove "# " from the start of the line."
So I
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 03:54 pm, Christopher Smiga wrote:
> I saw this on a mirror site earlier today.
>
> -
>
>
> Note: 3.1r0 CD image problem
>
> A bug has been discovered in the 3.1r0 CD/DVD images: new installs from
> these images will have a commented-out entry in /etc/apt/sources.l
I saw this on a mirror site earlier today.
-
Note: 3.1r0 CD image problem
A bug has been discovered in the 3.1r0 CD/DVD images: new installs from
these images will have a commented-out entry in /etc/apt/sources.list
for "http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates" rather than an active
e
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 20:27 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I took the occasion of this release to review my sources.list and preferences.
> In the process I did some experiments and found a puzzle that I hope
> someone will explain.
>
> With sarge in my sources.list I have nothing to download beca
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:52:20PM -0400, Curt Howland wrote:
> Ok, now that Debian 3.1 is out, does anyone know if any books will be
> written to cover the new distribution?
>
> The three year old books are not something I want to recommend to
> newbies.
>
> Curt-
Help out one of our Debian D
Curt Howland wrote:
Ok, now that Debian 3.1 is out, does anyone know if any books will be
written to cover the new distribution?
The three year old books are not something I want to recommend to
newbies.
Curt-
I'm not sure when this will be published, but it looks promising:
http://www.w
Curt Howland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ok, now that Debian 3.1 is out, does anyone know if any books will be written to cover
> the new distribution?
A new edition of "Debian GNU/Linux Bible" has been waiting for Sarge for a few months now, slated for a mid-July release last time I checked
I took the occasion of this release to review my sources.list and preferences.
In the process I did some experiments and found a puzzle that I hope
someone will explain.
With sarge in my sources.list I have nothing to download because I have been
tracking sarge for almost a year. But I set source
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:24:30PM -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
> Clive Menzies wrote:
> >A message to all those responsible for the sarge release:
> >http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/credits
> >Many thanks for all your brilliant work accomplished with generosity and
> >patience.
> >A very gr
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:36:37PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> Hi
>
> A message to all those responsible for the sarge release:
>
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/credits
>
> Many thanks for all your brilliant work accomplished with generosity and
> patience.
>
> A very grateful user ;
Tom Allison wrote:
>
> Should I be concerned that my link to
>
> http://non-us.debian.org testing/non-US/non-free
> and other 'non-us.debian.org' URLs?
>
> It seems that a lot of things are not responding. Is this the result of
> 38000 users all trying to access the exact same server?
>
>
T
Clive Menzies wrote:
Hi
A message to all those responsible for the sarge release:
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/credits
Many thanks for all your brilliant work accomplished with generosity and
patience.
A very grateful user ;)
Clive
Should I be concerned that my link to
http://n
John Fleming wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Hannes Mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: sarge: last night's "apt-get" overwrites/changes
/etc/X1
On 6/5/05, John Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Do others remember specific changes to this file?
Original:
[...]
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Configured Mouse"
Driver "mouse"
Option "CorePointer"
Option "Device"
- Original Message -
From: "Hannes Mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: sarge: last night's "apt-get" overwrites/changes
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4
On 6/5/05, Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:53:19AM +0200, Hannes Mayer wrote:
> >> Hi all!
> >>
> >> An "apt-get upgrade" last night broke my mousewheel. Furthermore the
> >> mouse speed has decreased. (several (all?) XFree86 packages were
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:53:19AM +0200, Hannes Mayer wrote:
Hi all!
An "apt-get upgrade" last night broke my mousewheel. Furthermore the
mouse speed has decreased. (several (all?) XFree86 packages were
updated)
The problem is that "apt-get" seems to overwrite/change
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 07:28:06PM +0200, Hannes Mayer wrote:
>
> Yep, testing should still default to sarge, since sarge is not released.
> I dunno if there is a difference between "apt-get upgrade" and
> aptitude. I actually never use aptitude.
> My XF86Config-4 was definately overwritten/change
Upadte only updates the package cache, upgrade adds/removes
packages.
-ishwar
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> Curious. I just used aptitude to update 'testing' (which still points
> to sarge, right?), got _lots_ of x-server stuff, but nothing rewrote
> my config file. Is there a d
On 6/5/05, Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/5/05, Hannes Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/5/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:53:19AM +0200, Hannes Mayer wrote:
> > > > Hi all!
> > > >
> > > > An "apt-get upgrade" last night
On 6/5/05, Hannes Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/5/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:53:19AM +0200, Hannes Mayer wrote:
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > An "apt-get upgrade" last night broke my mousewheel. Furthermore the
> > > mouse speed has decrea
On 6/5/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:53:19AM +0200, Hannes Mayer wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > An "apt-get upgrade" last night broke my mousewheel. Furthermore the
> > mouse speed has decreased. (several (all?) XFree86 packages were
> > updated)
> >
> >
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:53:19AM +0200, Hannes Mayer wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> An "apt-get upgrade" last night broke my mousewheel. Furthermore the
> mouse speed has decreased. (several (all?) XFree86 packages were
> updated)
>
> The problem is that "apt-get" seems to overwrite/change the X-config
>
ecific Exim questions should be directed to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
dev.random.
>
> From: Richard Darst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/05/29 Sun AM 12:17:27 GMT
> To: debian-user
> Subject: Re: Sarge/Exim4: Precedence of /etc/aliases?
>
> hello,
>
> On S
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 10:13:38AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a stock Sarge install for which I am trying to setup exim4.
>
> However, things are not behaving as expected.
>
> In /etc/aliases I have:
>
> root: me
> me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On the box, I have run "
hello,
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 10:13:38AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a stock Sarge install for which I am trying to setup exim4.
>
> However, things are not behaving as expected.
>
> In /etc/aliases I have:
>
> root: me
> me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the correct
Wayne Topa([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
David Jardine([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 10:29:30AM -0500, Steve Block wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 10:13:38AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >Basically, I want the box to deliver mail dir
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 10:29:30AM -0500, Steve Block wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 10:13:38AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I have a stock Sarge install for which I am trying to setup exim4.
> >
> >However, things are not behaving as expected.
> >
> >In /etc/aliases I have:
> >
> > root: m
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 10:13:38AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a stock Sarge install for which I am trying to setup exim4.
However, things are not behaving as expected.
In /etc/aliases I have:
root: me
me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On the box, I have run "dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config",
You are correct (sorry typo) it was 2.6.8-2-686 and not 2.6.8-2-386.
regards,
/virendra
Clive Menzies wrote:
On (26/05/05 18:06), noc-ops wrote:
Hi,
I know which kernel images are available. I'm asking for recommendation
for which kernel-image should I upgrade to.
Anyway, I went w/ 2.6.
On (26/05/05 18:06), noc-ops wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I know which kernel images are available. I'm asking for recommendation
> for which kernel-image should I upgrade to.
>
> Anyway, I went w/ 2.6.8-2-386 :-)
Depending on your processor, you may want to upgrade to the 2.6.8-2-686
kernel. '386' wil
noc-ops írta:
Hi,
I was under the impression that the latest "testing" install came w/
2.6 kernel by default. In installing i386 the kernel still shows as 2.4?
Am I missing something?
Also, which kernel-image (2.6.?) should I upgrade to?
Any insight will be appreciated.
regards,
/virend
Hi,
I know which kernel images are available. I'm asking for recommendation
for which kernel-image should I upgrade to.
Anyway, I went w/ 2.6.8-2-386 :-)
regards,
/virendra
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
noc-ops wrote:
Hi,
I was under the impression that the latest "testing" install came
Am 2005-05-26 12:03:50, schrieb noc-ops:
> Hi,
>
> I was under the impression that the latest "testing" install came w/ 2.6
> kernel by default. In installing i386 the kernel still shows as 2.4?
>
> Am I missing something?
Yes, Linux 2.4.27 is the default Kernel and you can get
Linux 2.6.8 if y
noc-ops wrote:
Hi,
I was under the impression that the latest "testing" install came w/
2.6 kernel by default. In installing i386 the kernel still shows as 2.4?
Am I missing something?
Also, which kernel-image (2.6.?) should I upgrade to?
Any insight will be appreciated.
regards,
/viren
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 12:03:50PM -0700, noc-ops wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was under the impression that the latest "testing" install
> came w/ 2.6 kernel by default. In installing i386 the kernel
> still shows as 2.4?
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Also, which kernel-image (2.6.?) should I upgrade
Lars Roland wrote:
So now the load looks ok, still the old Redhat is holding its head
above but now it is only with 10%. This may be due to further bugs in
the tg3 driver that hopefully a new kernel will fix - if not then I
must fill a bug report and send it to the driver developers, it can
not
On (23/05/05 08:07), John Moran wrote:
> I need to download the latest sarge iso and do a new install and went to
> the website to get it. I'm just a little confused as to what to
> download. There is a testing release dates May 22 and a sarge release
> dated april 27. Is sarge still testing or
On 5/21/05, Lars Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I just replaced my company anti-virus/anti-spam mail gateway from a
> Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.24 to Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8.1. I
> had hoped that this transition would lead to better performance (new
> perl, better drivers i
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 05:06:47PM +0200, Lars Roland wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I just replaced my company anti-virus/anti-spam mail gateway from a
> Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.24 to Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8.1. I
> had hoped that this transition would lead to better performance (new
> perl, better
On May 22 2005, Lars Roland wrote:
> I have doubled checked these numbers and they are true (perhaps Perl
> 5.8 is much faster than the old version 5.6 on Redhat) - note that
> most people has performance problems with spamassassin because they
> have crappy DNS perfoamnce, I use a dedicated DNS s
On 5/21/05, Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Lars Roland:
> >
> > I just replaced my company anti-virus/anti-spam mail gateway from a
> > Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.24 to Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8.1. I
> > had hoped that this transition would lead to better performance (new
> > per
* Lars Roland:
>
> I just replaced my company anti-virus/anti-spam mail gateway from a
> Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.24 to Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8.1. I
> had hoped that this transition would lead to better performance (new
> perl, better drivers in the kernel and so on) but the performance ha
On 5/21/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not sure. It appears that you have covered your bases pretty
> well in terms figuring out where the bottleneck might be. I
> would recommend reposting on debian-isp, since there are likely
> people there that are more accustomed to de
Lars Roland wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I just replaced my company anti-virus/anti-spam mail gateway from a
> Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.4.24 to Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8.1. I
> had hoped that this transition would lead to better performance (new
> perl, better drivers in the kernel and so on) but the
Omg, thanks Roberto.
-Original Message-
From: Roberto C. Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2005 12:48 PM
To: Matthew Joyce
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Sarge, coreutils and fileutils
Matthew Joyce wrote:
> Dear debian-user,
>
> I d
Matthew Joyce wrote:
> Dear debian-user,
>
> I decided to build a new intranet today, grabbed sarge-netinst and
> booted, installed, great.
>
> Now i'm trying to 'apt-get install php4' and something unpleasant is
> happening.
>
> intranet:~# apt-get install php4
> Reading Package Lists... Don
On 5/6/05, Marek Rudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> It is possible to install Debian sarge on IBM z800 ?
> If yes, did you have any documentation?
It should be able to, as the z800 can run the S390 port of Linux.
--
Paolo Alexis Falcone
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jacob S wrote:
If it were going to be in your office, which would you put on it? Do you
trust Sarge to be secure enough for your purposes?
If it helps, the security manager has agreed to support sarge since the
freeze.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Wed, 4 May 2005, William wrote:
I am about to colocate a debian server and now I don't know if I should
install woody or sarge.
I'll be colocating it in 1-3 weeks. I am thinking that I should probably use
sarge.
Any advice?
thanks William
I've been running sarge on my servers for months now,
| I am about to colocate a debian server and now I don't know if I
| should install woody or sarge.
| I'll be colocating it in 1-3 weeks. I am thinking that I should
| probably use sarge.
| Any advice?
I'm doing something very similar, and I chose to use Sarge. If you are
nervous about it, conta
On Wed, 4 May 2005 14:24:59 -0400
William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am about to colocate a debian server and now I don't know if I
> should install woody or sarge.
> I'll be colocating it in 1-3 weeks. I am thinking that I should
> probably use sarge.
> Any advice?
> thanks William
>
>
>
On Wednesday, 04.05.2005 at 14:24 -0400, William wrote:
> I am about to colocate a debian server and now I don't know if I
> should install woody or sarge.
>
> I'll be colocating it in 1-3 weeks. I am thinking that I should
> probably use sarge.
>
> Any advice?
I believe that 'testing-security'
On 5/4/05, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am about to colocate a debian server and now I don't know if I
> should install woody or sarge.
> I'll be colocating it in 1-3 weeks. I am thinking that I should
> probably use sarge.
> Any advice?
> thanks William
Well i would defenetly go sarge,
On Wed, 4 May 2005 14:24:59 -0400
William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am about to colocate a debian server and now I don't know if I
> should install woody or sarge.
> I'll be colocating it in 1-3 weeks. I am thinking that I should
> probably use sarge.
> Any advice?
As long as you are care
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Hasler said:
> It won't restart the service if you have left at least one K link in place.
> Debian provides several tools for turning services on and off. My favorite
> is sysvconfig (since I wrote it).
>
thanks, John. I'm checking out sysvcon
/phil writes:
> It does... what? If it checked to see if I've turned off a service...
It won't restart the service if you have left at least one K link in place.
Debian provides several tools for turning services on and off. My favorite
is sysvconfig (since I wrote it).
--
John Hasler
--
To
Phil Dyer wrote:
Nope. Because that is not how it works or has ever worked. Your
expectation is skewed from reality (sorry).
Hate to keep beating this. But my response is:
Just because it's not how it's ever worked doesn't mean it's right. Can
you give me reasoning as to *why* it works like th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Miquel van Smoorenburg said:
>>OK, although both solutions work, (I guess - I haven't tried the second
>>solution) it still seems kludgy to me. If I use the debian supplied tool
>>to remove a service from startup _totally_, and I use a debian supplied
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Phil Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Miquel van Smoorenburg said:
>
If you want to keep updates from starting the daemon, just chmod 644 it.
>>>
>>>That sounds reasonable...and simple. :) thanks.
>>
>> Reasonable, simple, a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Miquel van Smoorenburg said:
>>> If you want to keep updates from starting the daemon, just chmod 644 it.
>>
>>That sounds reasonable...and simple. :) thanks.
>
> Reasonable, simple, and wrong :)
>
> As long as one start or stop link is still presen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Phil Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>David Clymer wrote:
>>
>> The debian post install script probably doest go through the rc.*
>> directories looking for runlevel entries since these are all just
>> symlinks to a
Hello John.
My english is not very good so.
I have used for two years debian woody, in this time I have not
problems booting 2.4 customized kernels. Some months ago, I have changed
to Sarge, and since then, I have not been able to boot 2.6 kernels, with
problems very similars to those
On Thursday 06 January 2005 09:06 am, Peter B. Schmidt wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I had the same problem, kdm took my keyboard from me. I fixed it by
> copying the kdmrc.dpkg-dist over the exisiting kdmrc, which I have
> chosen to keep during install (which wass the cause of the problem;).
>
> Thanks t
Hi there,
I had the same problem, kdm took my keyboard from me. I fixed it by
copying the kdmrc.dpkg-dist over the exisiting kdmrc, which I have
chosen to keep during install (which wass the cause of the problem;).
Thanks to the guys at #debian and #debian-kde who pointed me there!
Cheers,
Pete
> would a dpkg-reconifigure xserver-xfree86 have "fixed" this??
>
> C
>
No. That was the first idea I tried. If I didn't have access to this mailing
list, my system would be useless. Thanks!
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
would a dpkg-reconifigure xserver-xfree86 have "fixed" this??
C
On Thursday 06 January 2005 07:43, Mike Chandler wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 January 2005 06:24 pm, John A Chaves wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 January 2005 07:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I just now checked and I don't have the f
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 06:24 pm, John A Chaves wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 January 2005 07:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I just now checked and I don't have the file "Xservers.dpkg-old" in that
> > directory.
> > Are you sure that's where it is? I don't have any way to search for it
> > wi
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 07:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just now checked and I don't have the file "Xservers.dpkg-old" in that
> directory.
> Are you sure that's where it is? I don't have any way to search for it
> without a keyboard.
I think that you only get the .dpkg-old file if y
- Original Message -
From: "John A Chaves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: sarge dist-upgrade today, no more keyboard
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 01:12 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if this has been covered, search
Thank you very much for the advices Andreas.
With the best regards
Marcelo
--
Marcelo Chiapparini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 05.01.05. 21:07, Andreas Janssen wrote:
Hello
Marcelo Chiapparini (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I want to install sarge in a new system. So I have two questions:
> a) Can I use a
Hello
Marcelo Chiapparini (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I want to install sarge in a new system. So I have two questions:
> a) Can I use a minimal bootable CD over a PPOE connection? I am asking
> because the information in the Debian web only mentions PPP: "The
> network install assumes that yo
George Karaolides wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 08:24 -0600, Kent West wrote:
I'd leave the machine in console mode (no X) for that period of time, to
see if the machine gets sluggish. If not, you know it's somehow related
to running X.
I have left it on console mode, and the problem reapp
Joey Hess wrote:
Hope that helps, though I doubt it. I will say that I doubt that many
people have devoted the time to looking at the rates security holes are
fixed in stable, unstable, and testing to sensibly compare them. Much of
the received wisdom on this topic is out of date or wrong.
Thanks J
Cliff Flood wrote:
> How do people feel about running Sarge or Sid facing the Internet
> considering it doesn't get security updates as promptly as Woody? I'm
> more concerned about daemons and remote exploitation than local issues.
> What, in the past, have been the response times for updated pa
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 08:24 -0600, Kent West wrote:
> I'd leave the machine in console mode (no X) for that period of time, to
> see if the machine gets sluggish. If not, you know it's somehow related
> to running X.
I have left it on console mode, and the problem reappeared. It
therefore seem
- Original Message -
From: "John A Chaves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: sarge dist-upgrade today, no more keyboard
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 01:12 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if this has been covered, search
John A Chaves said:
> I had the same problem. Don't know which Xserver options
> cause the problem, but restoring /etc/kde3/kdm/Xservers
> from /etc/kde3/kdm/Xservers.dpkg-old solved it for me.
...file as bug...
--
--Luke CS Sysadmin, Montana State University-Bozeman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 01:12 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry if this has been covered, search function gets no result...
> I have been running sarge flawlessly since May 2004, doing regular apt-get
> dist-upgrades.
> Today, dist-upgrade included over 100 MBs of mostly KDE stuff, and oth
Thanks Kent for your kind reply. I'll try to install sarge.
Apologize for my ignorant offense to the list.
Peace.
YH
Kent West wrote:
YH wrote:
Hi,
Is sarge stable to install?
Depends on your criteria. For personal workstation use, I find even Sid
to be stable enough for my needs, and that way I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:22:20AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
If you're only wanting to upgrade your kernel, and the 2.6 series is not
in the Woody repositories (implied from your post, but I haven't checked
lately), and you have network access, you can add the Stable lin
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:22:20AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> YH wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is sarge stable to install?
>
> Depends on your criteria. For personal workstation use, I find even Sid
> to be stable enough for my needs, and that way I get all the newest goodies.
>
> If I were installi
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 08:24 -0600, Kent West wrote:
> but after a while the
> >problem reappears.
> >
> How long a while? Minutes? Hours? Days?
Hours.
> I'd leave the machine in console mode (no X) for that period of time, to
> see if the machine gets sluggish. If not, you know it's somehow rela
George Karaolides wrote:
Greetings,
I am having problems running Debian Sarge on IBM ThinkCentre A50 PC's.
I have made an installation of the Desktop Environment from tasksel
using Debian Installer RC2. At some point the machine starts to behave
in an errratic manner: the system clock jumps forwar
YH wrote:
Hi,
Is sarge stable to install?
Depends on your criteria. For personal workstation use, I find even Sid
to be stable enough for my needs, and that way I get all the newest goodies.
If I were installing a non-critical server, I'd probably go with Stable.
For a critical server, I'd stic
On Monday 03 January 2005 23:07, YH wrote:
> Hi,
Its bad ettiquette to reply to a message with a completely new thread
>
> Is sarge stable to install? I want to use 2.6 kernel, either I can
> upgrade kernel from woody or re-install completely from Sarge, which one
> is better?
Read the following
Hi,
Is sarge stable to install? I want to use 2.6 kernel, either I can
upgrade kernel from woody or re-install completely from Sarge, which one
is better?
Thanks and please CC my email address.
YH
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
Title: Re: sarge install problem: read-only disk
Sorry for the repost. Replied to digest by accident. Thought better to keep it in the thread.
Hi Andreas,
on 1/1/05 5:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005
501 - 600 of 995 matches
Mail list logo
