Re: threads and latest libg++?

1997-12-04 Thread Dale Martin
Orn E. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you have to remove all the classes in c++ to get threads working, there isn't much sense in using c++ :-) I've had the same problem, and as far as I've been able to collect, g++ simply isn't, and won't be thread safe. If you wish for a thread safe

Re: threads and latest libg++?

1997-12-04 Thread Oleg Krivosheev
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Dale Martin wrote: Orn E. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you have to remove all the classes in c++ to get threads working, there isn't much sense in using c++ :-) I've had the same problem, and as far as I've been able to collect, g++ simply isn't, and won't

Re: threads and latest libg++?

1997-12-04 Thread Dale Martin
Orn E. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you have to remove all the classes in c++ to get threads working, there isn't much sense in using c++ :-) I've had the same problem, and as far as I've been able to collect, g++ simply isn't, and won't be thread safe. If you wish for a thread safe

Re: threads and latest libg++?

1997-12-04 Thread Oleg Krivosheev
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Dale Martin wrote: Orn E. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you have to remove all the classes in c++ to get threads working, there isn't much sense in using c++ :-) I've had the same problem, and as far as I've been able to collect, g++ simply isn't, and won't be