Am Mittwoch, 8. August 2012 schrieb Johannes Wiedersich:
On 08/08/12 09:14, lina wrote:
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
I checked that rsync is faster than scp,
but in my situations rsync has elapsed for 1 hour, I guess the network
Am Mittwoch, 8. August 2012 schrieb Darac Marjal:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:14:50PM +0800, lina wrote:
Hi,
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
I checked that rsync is faster than scp,
but in my situations rsync has elapsed for 1
On 08/10/2012 12:52 AM, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:00 AM, linalina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 Aug, 2012, at 23:05, Chris Bannistercbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:00:18PM +0800, lina wrote:
I don't know the reliable of the connection
On 8/10/2012 11:08 AM, Doug wrote:
All of that is quite correct, but it neglects one parameter: if the
RF connection depends on directional antennas, which it will
for any reasonable distance--say 1/2 mile or more--then wind may
become a significant effect if it causes the antennas to jiggle,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:00:18PM +0800, lina wrote:
I don't know the reliable of the connection between the two servers, I
guess it's okay.
But from my side, the wireless is not stable.
I don't know how to let it stable. I mean, not login every 10~15 minutes.
(btw, Is big wind affects the
On 9 Aug, 2012, at 23:05, Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:00:18PM +0800, lina wrote:
I don't know the reliable of the connection between the two servers, I
guess it's okay.
But from my side, the wireless is not stable.
I don't know how to let
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:00:12AM +0800, lina wrote:
I don't know how to check the signal strength except seeing the icon of the
network manager.
Sorry, I don't use network manager, but you could check by going
inside to test. The reason the transfer speeds could be slow, is because
of a
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:00 AM, lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 Aug, 2012, at 23:05, Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:00:18PM +0800, lina wrote:
I don't know the reliable of the connection between the two servers, I
guess it's okay.
But
2012/8/8 lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com
Hi,
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
I checked that rsync is faster than scp,
but in my situations rsync has elapsed for 1 hour, I guess the network
is also a problem
split (man split) your data into
lina:
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
Either use rsync without encryption (= not tunneled over SSH), or pipe
tar through netcat. The latter does not support resuming.
If you can tell us a bit more, we might be able to help better. Do you
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:14 AM, lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
I checked that rsync is faster than scp,
Well, sometimes. Certainly if you have some of the data in both
places and need to sync it,
Hallo Lina,
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
You can also use netcat (man nc - see under examples). It is probably
the fastest method.
I have used that in the past in combination with rsync: copy it using
netcat and check the result with
I user rsync for everything.
rsync -vaP /location/ user@remote-host:/location/
I've found it best sofar.
-Original Message-
From: Johann Spies [mailto:jsp...@sun.ac.za]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 9:59 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: which one is faster?
Hallo
On 08/08/12 09:14, lina wrote:
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
I checked that rsync is faster than scp,
but in my situations rsync has elapsed for 1 hour, I guess the network
is also a problem,
Here I wish to know are there some tools
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:14:50PM +0800, lina wrote:
Hi,
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
I checked that rsync is faster than scp,
but in my situations rsync has elapsed for 1 hour, I guess the network
is also a problem,
Here I wish
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
lina:
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
Either use rsync without encryption (= not tunneled over SSH), or pipe
tar through netcat. The latter does not support
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Johann Spies jsp...@sun.ac.za wrote:
Hallo Lina,
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
You can also use netcat (man nc - see under examples). It is probably
the fastest method.
I have used that in the past in
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Wiedersich
deb...@aktendiener.de wrote:
On 08/08/12 09:14, lina wrote:
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
I checked that rsync is faster than scp,
but in my situations rsync has elapsed for 1 hour, I
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:14:50PM +0800, lina wrote:
Hi,
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
I checked that rsync is faster than scp,
but in my situations rsync has
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:00:18PM +0800, lina wrote:
BTW, How to set the port for netcat?
The remote one has the following ports open:
Choose one not from that list above 1024 and make sure any firewalls
between the two computers allow that.
See the following examples:
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:14:50 +0800, lina wrote:
It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
from one server to another server.
Are both hosts remote (over Internet) or local (LAN)?
I checked that rsync is faster than scp, but in my situations rsync has
elapsed for 1 hour, I guess the
21 matches
Mail list logo
