Re: Ho to properly rebuild single module?

On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 3:14 PM Grzesiek wrote: > Hi there, > > I need to apply the following > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/1645106372-23004-1-git-send-email-mike.marcinis...@cornelisnetworks.com/T/#u > and rebuild ib_qib. To rebuild I wrote the following script > .

Re: Ho to properly rebuild single module?

On 2/27/22 23:13, Grzesiek wrote: > Hi there, > > I need to apply the following > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/1645106372-23004-1-git-send-email-mike.marcinis...@cornelisnetworks.com/T/#u > > and rebuild ib_qib. To rebuild I wrote the following script > ($1 is th

Re: Ho to properly rebuild single module?

On 2/27/22 22:21, Sven Hartge wrote: Grzesiek wrote: I need to apply the following https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/1645106372-23004-1-git-send-email-mike.marcinis...@cornelisnetworks.com/T/#u and rebuild ib_qib. The easiest way to ensure consistency would be to just rebuild the kernel

Re: Ho to properly rebuild single module?

Grzesiek wrote: > I need to apply the following > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/1645106372-23004-1-git-send-email-mike.marcinis...@cornelisnetworks.com/T/#u > and rebuild ib_qib. The easiest way to ensure consistency would be to just rebuild the kernel package(s) as a who

Ho to properly rebuild single module?

Hi there, I need to apply the following https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/1645106372-23004-1-git-send-email-mike.marcinis...@cornelisnetworks.com/T/#u and rebuild ib_qib. To rebuild I wrote the following script ($1 is the kernel version, i.e. 5.16.0-3) #!/bin/sh #use in /usr/src set -e -x tar

Re: dpkg in Bookworm insists to rebuild initrd

On Thu 10 Feb 2022 at 02:44:50 (-0500), Felix Miata wrote: > David Wright composed on 2022-02-09 23:36 (UTC-0600): > > On Wed 09 Feb 2022 at 23:09:40 (-0500), Felix Miata wrote: > > >> # inxi -S > >> System: > >> Host: ab560 Kernel: 5.15.0-3-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Trinity > >>

Re: dpkg in Bookworm insists to rebuild initrd

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 11:09:40PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > mv: cannot move '/boot/initrd.img-5.15.0-3-amd64.new' to > '/boot/initrd.img-5.15.0-3-amd64': Operation not permitted > What can be done to make dpkg stop trying to replace the initrd that I have > made > immutable? I don't want it

Re: dpkg in Bookworm insists to rebuild initrd

David Wright composed on 2022-02-09 23:36 (UTC-0600): > On Wed 09 Feb 2022 at 23:09:40 (-0500), Felix Miata wrote: >> # inxi -S >> System: >> Host: ab560 Kernel: 5.15.0-3-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Trinity >> Distro: Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid >> # dpkg --configure

Re: dpkg in Bookworm insists to rebuild initrd

On Wed 09 Feb 2022 at 23:09:40 (-0500), Felix Miata wrote: > # inxi -S > System: > Host: ab560 Kernel: 5.15.0-3-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Trinity > Distro: Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid > # dpkg --configure linux-image-5.15.0-3-amd64 > Setting up linux-image-5.15.0-3-amd64 (5.15.15-2)

dpkg in Bookworm insists to rebuild initrd

# inxi -S System: Host: ab560 Kernel: 5.15.0-3-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Trinity Distro: Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid # dpkg --configure linux-image-5.15.0-3-amd64 Setting up linux-image-5.15.0-3-amd64 (5.15.15-2) ... /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools: update-initramfs: Generating

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I was just asking, in case there would be some advantage. > For instance, it seems to install build dependencies automatically. I understand. It is bothering to install dependencies, I agree - but it is one time job. I do it when setting up the build environment - it

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

On 2020-04-23 08:31:32 +0200, deloptes wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > I was wondering whether apt-build could automate things even more > > than my current solution, but it seems that my current solution can > > do more, at least for the goal of just patching source packages and > >

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I was wondering whether apt-build could automate things even more > than my current solution, but it seems that my current solution can > do more, at least for the goal of just patching source packages and > rebuilding. I did not miss this in the beginning. I did not

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

On 2020-04-22 22:18:19 +0200, deloptes wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > On 2020-04-22 08:29:09 +0200, deloptes wrote: > >> OK I understand now. I did not have a problem to add a new section in the > >> changelog with > >> dch -v "4:$BUILDISTRO_NAME" -D "$DISTRO_NAME" -c $debian/changelog \

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2020-04-22 08:29:09 +0200, deloptes wrote: >> OK I understand now. I did not have a problem to add a new section in the >> changelog with >> dch -v "4:$BUILDISTRO_NAME" -D "$DISTRO_NAME" -c $debian/changelog \ >> "Autogenerated by building script" >> >>

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

On 2020-04-22 08:29:09 +0200, deloptes wrote: > OK I understand now. I did not have a problem to add a new section in the > changelog with > dch -v "4:$BUILDISTRO_NAME" -D "$DISTRO_NAME" -c $debian/changelog \ > "Autogenerated by building script" > > $BUILDISTRO_NAME is the release number

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I think that you misunderstood. I'm not talking about the build log > (which the end user will never see), but the Debian changelog file, > which will be installed as > > /usr/share/doc//changelog.Debian.gz > > For instance, for libtool on my machines I can see e.g.: >

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

On 2020-04-21 20:53:42 +0200, deloptes wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > Patches don't add log messages in general. I meant like what dch > > does. > yes because you are working outside of debuild. debuild creates a build file > that includes all the steps to produce the build > > in any

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Patches don't add log messages in general. I meant like what dch > does. yes because you are working outside of debuild. debuild creates a build file that includes all the steps to produce the build in any case

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

ention, it's > > > relatively simple. > > > > Can it handle the rebuild for multiple architectures? > > No. As far as I can tell, you cannot pass it that '-a' flag for > dpkg-buildpackage. > But then, '-a' means cross-compilation, and that tends to implement its > own,

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

ckages and would like those packages to be rebuilt with my changes > > > when a new package version is available. > > > > apt install apt-build > > > > Requires some scripting to run without a human intervention, it's > > relatively simple. > > Can it

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

version is available. > > apt install apt-build > > Requires some scripting to run without a human intervention, it's > relatively simple. Can it handle the rebuild for multiple architectures? And can one provide a log message associated with each patch? FYI, I currently use a

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

Hi, Thank you, I will check this out. Thomas Le mar. 21 avr. 2020 à 15:45, Reco a écrit : > > Hi. > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:23:37PM +0200, Thomas Martin wrote: > > My goal is simple : I'm applying few modifications on some Debian > > packages and would like those packages to be

Re: The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

Hi. On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:23:37PM +0200, Thomas Martin wrote: > My goal is simple : I'm applying few modifications on some Debian > packages and would like those packages to be rebuilt with my changes > when a new package version is available. apt install apt-build Requires some

The simpliest way to automatically rebuild few Debian packages ?

Hello, I would like to know what is the simplest way to rebuild Debian packages automatically when a new version of the package is released ? My goal is simple : I'm applying few modifications on some Debian packages and would like those packages to be rebuilt with my changes when a new package

Re: How to rebuild the keys for APT.

SOLUTION: I went though and added all the keys again and now it's working again. sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.debian.org --recv-keys [KEY_MISSING] Works good now.  Thanks everyone for the help. Phil On 16/05/2018 17:06, deloptes wrote: Philip wrote: I recently had to move a disk

Re: How to rebuild the keys for APT.

Philip wrote: > I recently had to move a disk image from machine to another machine > however when I fired it up on the new machine the APT keys were > broken/corrupted. The errors I'm getting are below... Is there a simple > way of fixing this? perhaps it is not only the gpg keys that got

How to rebuild the keys for APT.

I recently had to move a disk image from machine to another machine however when I fired it up on the new machine the APT keys were broken/corrupted. The errors I'm getting are below... Is there a simple way of fixing this? philip@cetus:~# apt update Ign:1 http://mirrors.linode.com/debian

[SOLVED] How to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture?

On 2018-01-25 23:03:50 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2018-01-25 15:30:02 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 02:56:17PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > To rebuild a Debian package, one can use: > > > > > > debuild -i -us -u

Re: How to rebuild APT keys on Debian 9.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 06:48:15PM +1200, Philip wrote: > Hi there, > > I've managed to break my apt keys is there a way to regenerate them? If I understand you correctly, you want to re-install the package "debian-archive-keyring". Of course,

How to rebuild APT keys on Debian 9.

Hi there, I've managed to break my apt keys is there a way to regenerate them? Phil

Re: How to correctly select gcc / why dkms rebuild failed on xtables-addons

iptables setup. So it fell back on my fail2ban protection > against ssh scripts. > > /usr/bin/gcc-4.8 was on strange file permissions, with not even > execute perms for root. Thus de dkms rebuild failed. > > now my questions: > > why was gcc-4.8 binary set to no execution, even

How to correctly select gcc / why dkms rebuild failed on xtables-addons

. /usr/bin/gcc-4.8 was on strange file permissions, with not even execute perms for root. Thus de dkms rebuild failed. now my questions: why was gcc-4.8 binary set to no execution, even for root? why is xtables-addons-dkms not using gcc-4.9? a simple chmod 700 /usr/bin/gcc-4.8 fixed the problem

Re: How to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture?

On 2018-01-26 09:47:58 +, Curt wrote: > On 2018-01-25, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2018-01-25 14:53:14 +, Curt wrote: > >> On 2018-01-25, wrote: > >> > > >> > It seems that you are missing the '386 (or more precisely the '686) >

Re: How to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture?

On 2018-01-25, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2018-01-25 14:53:14 +, Curt wrote: >> On 2018-01-25, wrote: >> > >> > It seems that you are missing the '386 (or more precisely the '686) >> > executables. Perhaps you need the package

Re: How to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture?

On 2018-01-25 14:53:14 +, Curt wrote: > On 2018-01-25, wrote: > > > > It seems that you are missing the '386 (or more precisely the '686) > > executables. Perhaps you need the package dpkg-cross. > > > >> If I need binutils-i686-linux-gnu, shouldn't

Re: How to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture?

On 2018-01-25 15:30:02 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 02:56:17PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > To rebuild a Debian package, one can use: > > > > debuild -i -us -uc -b > > > > But how to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign arch

Re: How to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture?

On 2018-01-25, wrote: > > It seems that you are missing the '386 (or more precisely the '686) > executables. Perhaps you need the package dpkg-cross. > >> If I need binutils-i686-linux-gnu, shouldn't dpkg-buildpackage fail >> when checking the build

Re: How to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 02:56:17PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > To rebuild a Debian package, one can use: > > debuild -i -us -uc -b > > But how to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture? > In my case for i386 fro

How to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture?

To rebuild a Debian package, one can use: debuild -i -us -uc -b But how to rebuild a Debian package for a foreign architecture? In my case for i386 from an amd64 machine. I've tried debuild -i -us -uc -b -a i386 but the build fails at some point: [...] dh_strip -a dh_strip: Compatibility

Re: kernel nvidia dkms rebuild after upgrade?

On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 11:31:58PM +, Yao Wei wrote: > It is caused by a missing dependency libelf-dev. > It is already reported against linux-headers-4.14.0-3-amd64: > https://bugs.debian.org/886474 > > I have the same symptom of broadcom-sta-dkms > Interesting. I noticed the libelf

Re: kernel nvidia dkms rebuild after upgrade?

Hello Dan — thanks kindly, I had indeed not noticed…. I guess I’ll have a chance to test if the libelf-dev issue is really the fix when the patches do roll out. In that vein, I would like to note that https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-5754

Re: kernel nvidia dkms rebuild after upgrade?

ebulding the modules manually -- > https://askubuntu.com/questions/53364/command-to-rebuild-all-dkms-modules-for-all-installed-kernels/174017 > > <https://askubuntu.com/questions/53364/command-to-rebuild-all-dkms-modules-for-all-installed-kernels/174017> > -- did fix it. > > Did I miss something? > > Cheers! > > -- > Boyan Penkov >

Re: kernel nvidia dkms rebuild after upgrade?

On 01/07/2018 07:47 PM, Boyan Penkov wrote: > and a backport (4.14.0-bpo2) -- in light of meltdown -- To avoid a false sense of security: according to [1], [2], [3], the current stretch-bpo kernel (linux-image-4.14.0-0.bpo.2-$arch) does *NOT* yet include any mitigations against meltdown. Daniel

Re: kernel nvidia dkms rebuild after upgrade?

e latest update to 4.9.0-5, and a backport (4.14.0-bpo2) -- in > light of meltdown -- my nvidia drivers failed to load. > > Rebulding the modules manually -- > > https://askubuntu.com/questions/53364/command-to-rebuild-all-dkms-modules-for-all-installed-kernels/174017 > -- did

kernel nvidia dkms rebuild after upgrade?

Hello, After the latest update to 4.9.0-5, and a backport (4.14.0-bpo2) -- in light of meltdown -- my nvidia drivers failed to load. Rebulding the modules manually -- https://askubuntu.com/questions/53364/command-to-rebuild-all-dkms-modules-for-all-installed-kernels/174017 -- did fix it. Did I

Filesystem corruption caused by RAID1 rebuild?

I am currently trying to rebuild a RAID1 where one of the disks was marked failed due to a power issue. I have re-added the disk like I had done before when replacing other failed raid disks, but in this case, once the raid rebuild starts, I start getting filesystem errors and the filesystem gets

Re: Questions sur le rebuild d'un paquet depuis ses sources debian (après modif)

Le samedi 09 novembre 2013 à 20:30, Charles Plessy a écrit : depuis la version 1.14.7 de dpkg, dpkg-buildpackage utilise automatiquement fakeroot si nécessaire. Donc on peut omettre -rfakeroot. Ça c'est une bonne nouvelle, ça va augmenter l'espérance de vie de mes claviers ;-) Merci pour

Re: Questions sur le rebuild d'un paquet depuis ses sources debian (après modif)

Bonjour, Le tuto sur le BSP/Beginers est plutôt pas mal selon moi. Je l'utilise régulièrement: https://wiki.debian.org/BSP/BeginnersHOWTO Joseph 2013/11/9 laurent Trinques scor...@qelectrotech.org: Le vendredi 8 novembre 2013, 10:20:01 Guy Roussin a écrit : Bonjour, Bosses plutôt en tant

Re: Questions sur le rebuild d'un paquet depuis ses sources debian (après modif)

Le Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:20:01AM +0100, Guy Roussin a écrit : Bosses plutôt en tant que user normal ... sauf lorsqu'il s'agit d'installerdes paquets (sudo ...). p.ex. : $ sudo apt-get build-dep toto $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc -b Bonjour tout le monde, depuis la version

Re: Questions sur le rebuild d'un paquet depuis ses sources debian (après modif)

Le vendredi 8 novembre 2013, 10:20:01 Guy Roussin a écrit : Bonjour, Bosses plutôt en tant que user normal ... sauf lorsqu'il s'agit d'installerdes paquets (sudo ...). p.ex. : $ sudo apt-get build-dep toto $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc -b Tu pourrais utiliser le numéro de

Re: Questions sur le rebuild d'un paquet depuis ses sources debian (après modif)

environnement propre, avec pbuilder par exemple, pour vérifier les dépendances de build, surtout si tu envisages de le rendre disponible. 3. Imaginons maintenant que le paquet toto, ce ne soit pas n'importe quel paquet mais que ce soit carrément linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64. La méthode de rebuild donnée

Re: Questions sur le rebuild d'un paquet depuis ses sources debian (après modif)

toto-foo sont incompatibles. 3. Imaginons maintenant que le paquet toto, ce ne soit pas n'importe quel paquet mais que ce soit carrément linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64. La méthode de rebuild donnée en exemple ci-dessus-elle toujours valable ? Ou bien pour un rebuild du noyau, c'est un cas spécifique

Questions sur le rebuild d'un paquet depuis ses sources debian (après modif)

pas n'importe quel paquet mais que ce soit carrément linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64. La méthode de rebuild donnée en exemple ci-dessus-elle toujours valable ? Ou bien pour un rebuild du noyau, c'est un cas spécifique ? 4. Même question pour le renommage. Lors du rebuild de linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 : y

Re: Questions sur le rebuild d'un paquet depuis ses sources debian (après modif)

soit carrément linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64. La méthode de rebuild donnée en exemple ci-dessus-elle toujours valable ? Ou bien pour un rebuild du noyau, c'est un cas spécifique ? Je pense que fakeroot make deb-pkg suffit -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org

Re: E: Couldn't rebuild package cache

/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_wheezy_main_binary-amd64_Packages: Hash Sum mismatch E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. E: Couldn't rebuild package cache Thanks ahead for the suggestions, I think that when your /var filled up, you were left

Re: E: Couldn't rebuild package cache

On Sun 24 Jun 2012 at 13:01:37 +0800, lina wrote: On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:39 PM, lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I don't know how to fix the following problem, It's fixed after changing the source.list to my former mirror. Switching backwards and forwards between mirrors may

Re: E: Couldn't rebuild package cache

, Best regards, W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_wheezy_main_binary-amd64_Packages: Hash Sum mismatch E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. E: Couldn't rebuild package cache Thanks ahead

E: Couldn't rebuild package cache

Hi, I don't know how to fix the following problem, W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_wheezy_main_binary-amd64_Packages: Hash Sum mismatch E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. E: Couldn't rebuild

Re: E: Couldn't rebuild package cache

/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_wheezy_main_binary-amd64_Packages: Hash Sum mismatch E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. E: Couldn't rebuild package cache Thanks ahead for the suggestions, Best regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: E: Couldn't rebuild package cache

instead. E: Couldn't rebuild package cache I looked for the solution to this myself some time ago, and found somewhere something about a bug and that and bzip2 had to be installed and then it worked without a hitch. Hope that helps you. Charlie

Last check before rebuild

I am going to be rebuilding two workstations on my network, primarily to get them to amd64 on new hardware. I've been watching the lists for any gotchas that might have cropped up, but I haven't really seen anything. So I thought I would ask before doing the reinstall. Is there anything that I

rebuild and install php 5.2.6-5

Hi all, On my squeeze system, I would like to get a PHP 5.2 release. This is for development, my dev team needs it. This is the changelog about 5.2.6 http://goo.gl/Ndvxu If I get the source package and just build it, I'll get the latest version, which I dont want. Where, in what archive

Re: rebuild and install php 5.2.6-5

On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:35:37 +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: On my squeeze system, I would like to get a PHP 5.2 release. This is for development, my dev team needs it. This is the changelog about 5.2.6 http://goo.gl/Ndvxu If I get the source package and just build it, I'll get the

Re: rebuild and install php 5.2.6-5

On 09/23/2011 05:08 PM, Camaleón wrote: Debian source packages for older versions can be fetched from here: http://snapshot.debian.org/package/php5/ MMM,... I love Debian! Thank Camaleon. -- RMA. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: Cannot rebuild kernel with custom DSDT

Taylor Brown wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey, thanks! I guess it was a bug with the source because after a wait and an update the kernel compiled fine. Great! Glad it worked... Hugo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: Re: Cannot rebuild kernel with custom DSDT

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey, thanks! I guess it was a bug with the source because after a wait and an update the kernel compiled fine. Taylor -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

Re: Cannot rebuild kernel with custom DSDT

://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609846 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34532 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15707 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703302 As a workaround, I am trying to rebuild the Debian kernel with a modified DSDT file. I have edited

Cannot rebuild kernel with custom DSDT

-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609846 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34532 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15707 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703302 As a workaround, I am trying to rebuild the Debian kernel with a modified DSDT file. I have edited and recompiled the DSDT file

Re: RAID 1 Server Proliant ML115 [REBUILD]

Pues yo usaria un arreglo RAID 5. Es mas completo que el RAID 1 en donde se deserdician discos por el sistema espejo de los datos. Ademas, se sabe de casos en los que incluso los RAID 1 han fallado y dado perdida de datos. Y la mayoria casi siempre no tiene otra alternativa que la de pedir

Re: RAID 1 Server Proliant ML115 [REBUILD]

El 10/05/11 14:31, salmuer escribió: Pues yo usaria un arreglo RAID 5. Es mas completo que el RAID 1 en donde se deserdician discos por el sistema espejo de los datos. Ademas, se sabe de casos en los que incluso los RAID 1 han fallado y dado perdida de datos. Y la mayoria casi siempre

Re: RAID 1 Server Proliant ML115 [REBUILD]

El mar, 10-05-2011 a las 12:31 +, salmuer escribió: Pues yo usaria un arreglo RAID 5. Es mas completo que el RAID 1 en donde se deserdician discos por el sistema espejo de los datos. Ademas, se sabe de casos en los que incluso los RAID 1 han fallado y dado perdida de datos. Y la

Re: RAID 1 Server Proliant ML115 [REBUILD]

El Tue, 10 May 2011 14:50:28 +0200, Juan Antonio escribió: El 10/05/11 14:31, salmuer escribió: Pues yo usaria un arreglo RAID 5. Es mas completo que el RAID 1 en donde se deserdician discos por el sistema espejo de los datos. Ademas, se sabe de casos en los que incluso los RAID 1 han

Re: RAID 1 Server Proliant ML115 [REBUILD]

de 160gb. Todo perfecto, pero un disco empezo a funcionar mal, apague, cambie disco y funcion Rebuild. Despues de 2 meses mando un reboot, y veo que aun sigue en Rebuild, es decir nunca se realizo el mirroring de nuevo. En su momento para que debian me tome el RAID, en la instalacion le di el

RAID 1 Server Proliant ML115 [REBUILD]

active RAID y cree el array mirroring con 2 discos de 160gb. Todo perfecto, pero un disco empezo a funcionar mal, apague, cambie disco y funcion Rebuild. Despues de 2 meses mando un reboot, y veo que aun sigue en Rebuild, es decir nunca se realizo el mirroring de nuevo. En su momento para que

Re: how to rebuild single kernel module

Alex, You can't rebuild single module. If you wanna do it the Debian way, you have to rebuild whole kernel (install kernel-package and see make-kpkg manual for details). On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 02:41:45PM +1000, Alexander Samad wrote: I need to make a quick change to a kernel module, I would

Re: how to rebuild single kernel module

Okay, thats a bit extreme, m-a seems to be able to build a module with just the headers. so all I want to do is rebuild qcserial, patched it to add new id. don't need to produce a deb. what i tried was installed the linux-source-2.6.34-1 deb copied .config from the headers directory did make

Re: how to rebuild single kernel module

Le 14783ième jour après Epoch, Alexander Samad écrivait: Okay, thats a bit extreme, m-a seems to be able to build a module with just the headers. so all I want to do is rebuild qcserial, patched it to add new id. don't need to produce a deb. what i tried was installed the linux-source

how to rebuild single kernel module

I need to make a quick change to a kernel module, I would like to just get the source and make the change and build. How can I build ??? I did a google, but couldn't find the debian way of building with linux-headers.. Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: Rebuild of kdepim-3.5.9 fails - no libkode.so.1.0.0

On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 00:26 +0200, deloptes wrote: John A. Sullivan III wrote: libkode.so.1.0.0 you need this ... did you enable shared? where do you get the code for kdepim-3.5.9? from Trinity project ? regards I used the Debian source. We had sponsored some fixes with Trinity

Re: Rebuild of kdepim-3.5.9 fails - no libkode.so.1.0.0

John A. Sullivan III wrote: libkode.so.1.0.0 you need this ... did you enable shared? where do you get the code for kdepim-3.5.9? from Trinity project ? regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Rebuild of kdepim-3.5.9 fails - no libkode.so.1.0.0

Hello, all. We are attempting to rebuild kdepim on Lenny using patches supplied by the Trinity project (http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/) to fix some of the critical Kontact issues. When we try to do so, we fail with: g++ -DHAVE_BOOST -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2

Re: searching for rebuild daemon?

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:54:17AM +0200, Peter Jordan wrote: Hello, I'm searching for a daemon which checks if a newer version of a package is available, downloads its sorces, patches the sources, rebuilds the package and if that all successes then the daemon should upload the new package

Re: searching for rebuild daemon?

then the daemon should upload the new package to my debian repository. Is there any working solution? Something on top of buildd/wanna-build ? Do you want to assume that a package has a get-orig-source target? A debian/watch file? I want to rebuild existing versions of a package, not new versions

Re: searching for rebuild daemon?

Ron Johnson, 10/24/2008 07:46 AM: On 10/23/08 23:54, Peter Jordan wrote: Hello, I'm searching for a daemon which checks if a newer version of a package is available, downloads its sorces, patches the sources, rebuilds the package and if that all successes then the daemon should upload the

Re: searching for rebuild daemon?

On 10/24/08 08:26, Peter Jordan wrote: Ron Johnson, 10/24/2008 07:46 AM: On 10/23/08 23:54, Peter Jordan wrote: Hello, I'm searching for a daemon which checks if a newer version of a package is available, downloads its sorces, patches the sources, rebuilds the package and if that all

searching for rebuild daemon?

Hello, I'm searching for a daemon which checks if a newer version of a package is available, downloads its sorces, patches the sources, rebuilds the package and if that all successes then the daemon should upload the new package to my debian repository. Is there any working solution? Thanks,

Re: searching for rebuild daemon?

On 10/23/08 23:54, Peter Jordan wrote: Hello, I'm searching for a daemon which checks if a newer version of a package is available, downloads its sorces, patches the sources, rebuilds the package and if that all successes then the daemon should upload the new package to my debian repository.

Re: Mdadm won't rebuild a RAID5

with no problem at all. Are you certain the rebuild was completed? Did you --add the drives to the array after --remove'ing the broken ones? State : active, degraded [...] 0 00- removed 1 00- removed 2 340

Re: Mdadm won't rebuild a RAID5

Also sprach Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.08.18.1537 +0200]: 3) RAID 5 is not resilient against multiple failures.  We now use RAID 1.    RAID 1 is also faster, although it sometimes requires more drives.    In extreme cases we use RAID 1 with three or more drives. On Monday 20 August 2007

Re: Mdadm won't rebuild a RAID5

also sprach Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.08.20.1627 +0200]: 3) RAID 5 is not resilient against multiple failures.  We now use RAID 1.    RAID 1 is also faster, although it sometimes requires more drives.    In extreme cases we use RAID 1 with three or more drives. On Monday 20 August

Re: Mdadm won't rebuild a RAID5

a difference. I had not partitioned the drives since mdadm seems okay without partitions. He said even if I only use one drive-wide partition, I should still partition the drives in a RAID first. Fortunately, this was in a backup system so I can get new drives and rebuild it from scratch

Re: Mdadm won't rebuild a RAID5

don't see why you'd have to do this. The partition table would get overwritten anyway. Fortunately, this was in a backup system so I can get new drives and rebuild it from scratch with the larger drives. I've already got ideas for using the failed drives that are proving to be just fine. Have you

Re: Mdadm won't rebuild a RAID5

friend is confused. :) I don't see why you'd have to do this. The partition table would get overwritten anyway. I've noticed, though, that on one system I had originally defined the raid using /dev/hde1, hdf1, and so on. When I tried to rebuild it with /dev/hde, hdf, and so on, it would

Re: Mdadm won't rebuild a RAID5

, it had never started rebuilding the spare. This situation *should* be recoverable. Contact me off-list if you'd be willing to let me log in as root and have a look. I've noticed, though, that on one system I had originally defined the raid using /dev/hde1, hdf1, and so on. When I tried to rebuild

Re: Mdadm won't rebuild a RAID5

on. When I tried to rebuild it with /dev/hde, hdf, and so on, it would not rebiuld. Sure, partitions have different offsets, so the superblock could not be found. Have you inspected the smartctl output and checked for SMART errors? I looked at the logs. Is this a different output

Re: Mdadm won't rebuild a RAID5

also sprach Hal Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.08.21.0003 +0200]: Any suggestions or warnings from others so I can make sure this doens't happen again are appreciated. Remember, the two drives I've already removed that mdadm had said were bad have tested out as fine. I suspect

Mdadm won't rebuild a RAID5

, find out why mdadm is not rebuilding the RAID or to get it to rebuild it? It seems to think the drives are all okay when it's adding them and doesn't report any issues with any drives until it's done, then it says there aren't enough drives to start the RAID. Hal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Mdadm won't rebuild a RAID5

that there are actually two bad drives. Any ideas how I can get more information, find out why mdadm is not rebuilding the RAID or to get it to rebuild it? It seems to think the drives are all okay when it's adding them and doesn't report any issues with any drives until it's done, then it says

How do I rebuild alternative symlinks?

I just moved a debian installation from one system to another by mirroring /opt, etc, /home, /var, and /usr/local -- and then using dpkg --set-selections to get all the same packages installed on the new box. Everything's gone great except for the alternatives system. For some reason, none of the

  1   2   3   >